Literature DB >> 21766046

Content Analysis of Major Textbooks and Online Resources Used in Responsible Conduct of Research Instruction.

Alexander A Kon1, Debie A Schilling, Elizabeth Heitman, Nicholas H Steneck, James M Dubois.   

Abstract

Instruction in the responsible conduct of research (RCR) is required for all trainees funded by the National Institues of Health (NIH) or National Science Foundation (NSF). A recent Delphi study identified 53 key topics in 7 core areas that RCR education experts felt should be included in this instruction, which is required of many trainees in clinical and translational research. We performed a content analysis of major textbooks and online resources used in RCR instruction to determine the extent to which the 53 key topics identified in the Delphi study are covered by these resources. Textbooks and online resources used in RCR education at Clinical and Translational Science Award institutions were identified via survey. These resources were subjected to a content analysis. The 53 key topics identified in the Delphi study formed the basis of these analyses. We identified 10 textbooks and 1 online resource currently in use. Of the 53 key topics, only 4 were included in all 11 resources, and another 12 were included in 10. Twenty-three topics were covered in fewer than 65% of the resources, and two topics were absent from nearly all. Educators in clinical and translational research should be aware of key topics that are not covered in the RCR textbooks and online resources they may use and should consider augmenting discussion of such topics with other materials.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21766046      PMCID: PMC3135017          DOI: 10.1080/21507716.2011.564263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJOB Prim Res        ISSN: 2150-7724


  5 in total

1.  Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content.

Authors:  Elizabeth Heitman; Ruth Ellen Bulger
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Reported goals for responsible conduct of research courses.

Authors:  Michael W Kalichman; Dena K Plemmons
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research.

Authors:  Nicholas H Steneck; Ruth Ellen Bulger
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Instruction in the responsible conduct of research: an inventory of programs and materials within CTSAs.

Authors:  James M DuBois; Debie A Schilling; Elizabeth Heitman; Nicholas H Steneck; Alexander A Kon
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.689

5.  Teaching and Assessing the Responsible Conduct of Research: A Delphi Consensus Panel Report.

Authors:  James M Dubois; Jeffrey M Dueker
Journal:  J Res Adm       Date:  2009
  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  The Need for Social Ethics in Interdisciplinary Environmental Science Graduate Programs: Results from a Nation-Wide Survey in the United States.

Authors:  Troy E Hall; Jesse Engebretson; Michael O'Rourke; Zach Piso; Kyle Whyte; Sean Valles
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Development and Preliminary Validation of a New Measure of Values in Scientific Work.

Authors:  Tammy English; Alison L Antes; Kari A Baldwin; James M DuBois
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  The Role of Culture and Acculturation in Researchers' Perceptions of Rules in Science.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; Tammy English; Kari A Baldwin; James M DuBois
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Smart Teaching Matters! Applying the Research on Learning to Teaching RCR.

Authors:  Camille Nebeker
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2014-12-15

5.  Assessment of research ethics education offerings of pharmacy master programs in an Arab nation relative to top programs worldwide: A qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Wesam S Ahmed; Camille Nebeker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.