Literature DB >> 15518993

The effects of changes in consequences on hens' performance in delayed-matching-to-sample tasks.

Shinichi Nakagawa1, Richard J M Etheredge, T Mary Foster, Catherine E Sumpter, William Temple.   

Abstract

A delayed-matching-to-sample (DMTS) task was used to investigate remembering with domestic hens. In Conditions 1 and 3 of Experiment 1, six hens responded under a mixed-delay procedure with delays of 0.25, 2, and 8 s. In Condition 2, the reinforcer for correct responding was delayed for 6 s after each correct matching response on 2-s delay trials. In Condition 1, discrimination performance decreased monotonically over the three delays. With the delay to the reinforcer, the decreases were non-monotonic as a result of the considerable drop in the accuracy of discrimination on the 2-s delay trials. Performance at the 2-s delay did not recover completely in Condition 3. In Conditions 1 and 3 of Experiment 2, five hens responded under a mixed-delay procedure with delays of 0, 4, and 16 s. In Condition 2 no reinforcers were provided for correct responding on 0- and 16-s delay trials. When reinforcers were available on all trials discrimination performance decreased monotonically with delay. There were non-monotonic changes in discrimination with delay when there was extinction at two delays resulting mainly from a large drop in discrimination performance at 0 s. In addition, response latencies increased markedly at the two delays associated with extinction. Performance recovered completely in Condition 3. The data support the ideas that remembering involves a temporal discrimination that the effects of delaying reinforcement and removing reinforcement may differ, and that the measurement of response latencies may be a useful tool in DMTS procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15518993     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2004.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  3 in total

1.  Reversing the signaled magnitude effect in delayed matching to sample: delay-specific remembering.

Authors:  K Geoffrey White; Glenn S Brown
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Reversing the course of forgetting.

Authors:  K Geoffrey White; Glenn S Brown
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A delay-specific differential outcomes effect in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  K Geoffrey White; Rebecca J Sargisson
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.986

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.