Literature DB >> 25784485

A delay-specific differential outcomes effect in delayed matching to sample.

K Geoffrey White1, Rebecca J Sargisson.   

Abstract

In delay-specific remembering, accuracy in delayed matching-to-sample tasks is enhanced after single delays or retention intervals relative to performance at other delays. In the differential-outcomes effect (DOE), accuracy is enhanced at all delays when the outcomes of correct choices are quantitatively or qualitatively different, compared to when outcomes are the same. In the present experiments, we aimed to demonstrate a delay-specific DOE by arranging differential outcomes for correct responses at some delays and same outcomes at other delays. In each of two experiments, four pigeons worked in delayed matching-to-sample tasks with delays of 0.5, 5, and 15 s, or 0 s, 3 s, and 12 s mixed within session. Correct choices produced different reward durations (differential outcomes) at one or two delays, or the same reward durations (same outcomes) at the other delays, on a within-session basis. There was evidence of improved accuracy at delays at which differential outcomes were arranged, compared to accuracy at delays at which same outcomes were arranged, that is, a delay-specific DOE. The more usual DOE was confirmed in a third experiment with same outcomes at all delays in one condition and differential outcomes at all delays in another. We discuss implications of a delay-specific DOE for theories of the DOE which attribute the effect to enhanced stimulus control by expectancies of reward outcomes generated at the time of sample presentation.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25784485     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-015-0174-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  24 in total

1.  Generalization of delayed matching to sample following training at different delays.

Authors:  R J Sargisson; K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The effects of changes in consequences on hens' performance in delayed-matching-to-sample tasks.

Authors:  Shinichi Nakagawa; Richard J M Etheredge; T Mary Foster; Catherine E Sumpter; William Temple
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2004-11-30       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  An investigation of the differential-outcomes effect within sessions.

Authors:  B M Jones; K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The relation between the generalized matching law and signal-detection theory.

Authors:  M C Davison; R D Tustin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Characteristics of forgetting functions in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Nonhuman short-term memory: A quantitative reanalysis of selected findings.

Authors:  J T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The optimal correction for estimating extreme discriminability.

Authors:  Glenn S Brown; K Geoffrey White
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-08

8.  Two-choice conditional discrimination performance of pigeons as a function of reward expectancy, prechoice delay, and domesticity.

Authors:  D L Brodigan; G B Peterson
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  1976-05

9.  Discriminative cue properties of different fears and their role in response selection in dogs.

Authors:  J B Overmier; J A Bull; M A Trapold
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1971-09

10.  Effects of differential reinforcement expectancies on successive matching-to-sample performance in pigeons.

Authors:  R E DeLong; E A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1981-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.