Literature DB >> 21761374

Development and validation of a new automatic algorithm for quantification of left ventricular volumes and function in gated myocardial perfusion SPECT using cardiac magnetic resonance as reference standard.

Helen Soneson1, Fredrik Hedeer, Carmen Arévalo, Marcus Carlsson, Henrik Engblom, Joey F A Ubachs, Håkan Arheden, Einar Heiberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: By gating image acquisition in myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) to ECG, left ventricular (LV) volumes and function can be determined. Several previous studies have shown that existing MPS software packages underestimate LV volumes compared to cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). The aim of this study was therefore to develop a new LV segmentation algorithm for gated MPS using CMR as reference standard. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 126 patients with suspected coronary artery disease, who underwent both gated MPS and CMR were retrospectively included. The proposed LV segmentation algorithm (Segment) was trained in 26 patients, and tested in 100 patients in comparison to four commercially available MPS software packages (QGS, MyoMetrix, ECTb, and Exini) using CMR as reference standard. Mean bias ± SD between MPS and CMR was for EDV -5% ± 12%, -43% ± 8%, -40% ± 8%, -42% ± 9%, -32% ± 7%, for ESV 0% ± 17%, -41% ± 16%, -34% ± 15%, -54% ± 13%, -41% ± 10%, for EF -2% ± 13%, -1% ± 14%, -7% ± 15%, 17% ± 16%, 10% ± 17% for Segment, QGS, MyoMetrix, ECTb, and Exini, respectively, and for LVM 3% ± 18%, 33% ± 25%, 37% ± 24% for Segment, QGS, and ECTb, respectively. Correlation between MPS by Segment and CMR were for EDV R (2) = 0.89, for ESV R (2) = 0.92, for EF R (2) = 0.69, and for LVM R (2) = 0.72, with no difference compared to the correlation between the other MPS software packages and CMR (EDV R (2) = 0.86-0.92, ESV R (2) = 0.91-0.93, EF R (2) = 0.64-0.65, and LVM R (2) = 0.68-0.70).
CONCLUSION: The Segment software quantifies LV volumes and EF by MPS with similar correlation and a low bias compared to other MPS software packages, using CMR as reference standard. Hence, the Segment software shows potential to provide clinically relevant volumes and functional values from MPS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21761374     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-011-9427-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  25 in total

1.  Validation of 4D-MSPECT and QGS for quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction from gated 99mTc-MIBI SPET: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Claudia S A Lipke; Harald P Kühl; Bernd Nowak; Hans-Juergen Kaiser; Patrick Reinartz; Karl-Christian Koch; Udalrich Buell; Wolfgang M Schaefer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Ventricular volume and mass by CMR.

Authors:  Dudley J Pennell
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.364

3.  Automated quantification of myocardial perfusion SPECT using simplified normal limits.

Authors:  Piotr J Slomka; Hidetaka Nishina; Daniel S Berman; Cigdem Akincioglu; Aiden Abidov; John D Friedman; Sean W Hayes; Guido Germano
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Evaluation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by automated gated myocardial SPECT versus cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Eva Persson; Marcus Carlsson; John Palmer; Olle Pahlm; Håkan Arheden
Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.273

5.  Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report.

Authors:  Dudley J Pennell; Udo P Sechtem; Charles B Higgins; Warren J Manning; Gerald M Pohost; Frank E Rademakers; Albert C van Rossum; Leslee J Shaw; E Kent Yucel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 6.  Gated SPECT in assessment of regional and global left ventricular function: major tool of modern nuclear imaging.

Authors:  Aiden Abidov; Guido Germano; Rory Hachamovitch; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction from gated 99mTc-MIBI SPECT: MRI validation of the EXINI heart software package.

Authors:  Oliver H Winz; Philipp T Meyer; Daniela Knollmann; Claudia S A Lipke; Harald P Kühl; Carola Oelve; Wolfgang M Schaefer
Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 2.273

8.  What is the optimal clinical technique for measurement of left ventricular volume after myocardial infarction? A comparative study of 3-dimensional echocardiography, single photon emission computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jonathan Chan; Carly Jenkins; Frederick Khafagi; Leanne Du; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.251

9.  Experimental validation of a new quantitative method for the analysis of infarct size by cardiac perfusion tomography (SPECT).

Authors:  L Mortelmans; J Nuyts; J Vanhaecke; A Verbruggen; M De Roo; H De Geest; P Svetens; F Van de Werf
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1993-09

10.  Quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction from gated 99mTc-MIBI SPECT: validation of an elastic surface model approach in comparison to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, 4D-MSPECT and QGS.

Authors:  Lars Stegger; Claudia S A Lipke; Peter Kies; Bernd Nowak; Otmar Schober; Udalrich Buell; Michael Schäfers; Wolfgang M Schaefer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative Clinical Nuclear Cardiology, Part 1: Established Applications.

Authors:  Ernest V Garcia; Piotr Slomka; Jonathan B Moody; Guido Germano; Edward P Ficaro
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Validation of an automated method to quantify stress-induced ischemia and infarction in rest-stress myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Helen Fransson; Michael Ljungberg; Marcus Carlsson; Henrik Engblom; Håkan Arheden; Einar Heiberg
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Prognostic value of normal stress myocardial perfusion imaging and ventricular function in Japanese patients with chronic kidney disease: a study based on the J-ACCESS-3 database.

Authors:  Shinro Matsuo; Kenichi Nakajima; Yasuchika Takeishi; Tsunehiko Nishimura
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Head-to-head comparison of a 2-day myocardial perfusion gated SPECT protocol and cardiac magnetic resonance late gadolinium enhancement for the detection of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Marcus Carlsson; Fredrik Hedeer; Henrik Engblom; Hakan Arheden
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Impact of scar on SPECT assay of left ventricular contraction dyssynchrony.

Authors:  Daniel R Ludwig; Mati Friehling; Erik B Schelbert; David Schwartzman
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Quantitative Clinical Nuclear Cardiology, Part 1: Established Applications.

Authors:  Ernest V Garcia; Piotr Slomka; Jonathan B Moody; Guido Germano; Edward P Ficaro
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Assessment of four different cardiac softwares for evaluation of LVEF with CZT-SPECT vs CMR in 48 patients with recent STEMI.

Authors:  Antoine Plateau; Clément Bouvet; Charles Merlin; Bruno Pereira; Bertrand Barres; Guillaume Clerfond; Florent Cachin; Lucie Cassagnes
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Evaluation of inter-departmental variability of ejection fraction and cardiac volumes in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy using simulated data.

Authors:  Elin Trägårdh; Michael Ljungberg; Lars Edenbrandt; Eva Örndahl; Lena Johansson; Agneta Gustafsson; Cathrine Jonsson; Jessica Hagerman; Katrine Riklund; David Minarik
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2015-01-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.