PURPOSE: Many patients presently receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) do not respond. A disproportionate number of nonresponders have ischemic cardiomyopathy, with significant left ventricular (LV) scar burden. Current selection criteria, such as electrocardiography or echocardiography, may not reliably portray the magnitude of CRT-remediable LV contraction dyssynchrony. Although phase analysis of gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) image data is increasingly appreciated as a tool for quantifying dyssynchrony, its use in the setting of scar has not been adequately evaluated. METHODS: Consecutive patients with ischemic (ICM, n = 50) or nonischemic (NICM, n = 39) cardiomyopathy underwent SPECT imaging prior to receiving CRT. In each patient, phase analysis of the raw images was performed to yield a phase standard deviation (PSD), an index which varies directly with the magnitude of dyssynchrony. ICM patient image data were also reanalyzed after scarred segments were stripped away. RESULTS: Raw image analysis demonstrated that PSD was significantly larger among ICM (57 ± 17°) than NICM (35 ± 13°, p < 0.001) patients. Among ICM patients, PSD after stripping of scarred segments was significantly decreased (40 ± 13°, p < 0.001). Signals emanating from scarred segments were of low amplitude and presented a random pattern, suggestive of noise rather than indicating contraction. CONCLUSION: PSD values may be spuriously increased by scar. These findings may be important when using SPECT in selecting ischemic cardiomyopathy patients for CRT.
PURPOSE: Many patients presently receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) do not respond. A disproportionate number of nonresponders have ischemic cardiomyopathy, with significant left ventricular (LV) scar burden. Current selection criteria, such as electrocardiography or echocardiography, may not reliably portray the magnitude of CRT-remediable LV contraction dyssynchrony. Although phase analysis of gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) image data is increasingly appreciated as a tool for quantifying dyssynchrony, its use in the setting of scar has not been adequately evaluated. METHODS: Consecutive patients with ischemic (ICM, n = 50) or nonischemic (NICM, n = 39) cardiomyopathy underwent SPECT imaging prior to receiving CRT. In each patient, phase analysis of the raw images was performed to yield a phase standard deviation (PSD), an index which varies directly with the magnitude of dyssynchrony. ICM patient image data were also reanalyzed after scarred segments were stripped away. RESULTS: Raw image analysis demonstrated that PSD was significantly larger among ICM (57 ± 17°) than NICM (35 ± 13°, p < 0.001) patients. Among ICM patients, PSD after stripping of scarred segments was significantly decreased (40 ± 13°, p < 0.001). Signals emanating from scarred segments were of low amplitude and presented a random pattern, suggestive of noise rather than indicating contraction. CONCLUSION:PSD values may be spuriously increased by scar. These findings may be important when using SPECT in selecting ischemic cardiomyopathypatients for CRT.
Authors: Sylvain Reuter; Stephane Garrigue; S Serge Barold; Pierre Jais; Meleze Hocini; Michel Haissaguerre; Jacques Clementy Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2002-02-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: James A White; Raymond Yee; Xiaping Yuan; Andrew Krahn; Allan Skanes; Michele Parker; George Klein; Maria Drangova Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-10-31 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Maureen M Henneman; Ji Chen; Petra Dibbets-Schneider; Marcel P Stokkel; Gabe B Bleeker; Claudia Ypenburg; Ernst E van der Wall; Martin J Schalij; Ernest V Garcia; Jeroen J Bax Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2007-06-15 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Luciano C Amado; Bernhard L Gerber; Sandeep N Gupta; Dan W Rettmann; Gilberto Szarf; Robert Schock; Khurram Nasir; Dara L Kraitchman; João A C Lima Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-12-21 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Mati Friehling; Ji Chen; Samir Saba; Raveen Bazaz; David Schwartzman; Evan C Adelstein; Ernest Garcia; William Follansbee; Prem Soman Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-07-19 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Kenneth C Bilchick; Veronica Dimaano; Katherine C Wu; Robert H Helm; Robert G Weiss; Joao A Lima; Ronald D Berger; Gordon F Tomaselli; David A Bluemke; Henry R Halperin; Theodore Abraham; David A Kass; Albert C Lardo Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2008-09
Authors: Mark A Trimble; Salvador Borges-Neto; Emily F Honeycutt; Linda K Shaw; Robert Pagnanelli; Ji Chen; Ami E Iskandrian; Ernest V Garcia; Eric J Velazquez Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2008 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Anna I Mishkina; Victor V Saushkin; Tariel A Atabekov; Svetlana I Sazonova; Vladimir V Shipulin; Samia Massalha; Roman E Batalov; Sergey V Popov; Konstantin V Zavadovsky Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 3.872
Authors: Hanna Hämäläinen; Alisa Corovai; Jussi Laitinen; Tiina M Laitinen; Marja Hedman; Antti Hedman; Antti Kivelä; Tomi P Laitinen Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2020-08-31 Impact factor: 5.952