Literature DB >> 21752821

Masculine voices signal men's threat potential in forager and industrial societies.

David A Puts1, Coren L Apicella, Rodrigo A Cárdenas.   

Abstract

Humans and many non-human primates exhibit large sexual dimorphisms in vocalizations and vocal anatomy. In humans, same-sex competitors and potential mates attend to acoustic features of male vocalizations, but vocal masculinity especially increases perceptions of physical prowess. Yet, the information content of male vocalizations remains obscure. We therefore examined relationships between sexually dimorphic acoustic properties and men's threat potential. We first introduce a new measure of the structure of vocal formant frequencies, 'formant position' (Pf), which we show is more sexually dimorphic and more strongly related to height than is the most widely used measure of formant structure, 'formant dispersion', in both a US sample and a sample of Hadza foragers from Tanzania. We also show large sexual dimorphisms in the mean fundamental frequency (F0) and the within-utterance standard deviation in F0 (F0-s.d.) in both samples. We then explore relationships between these acoustic parameters and men's body size, strength, testosterone and physical aggressiveness. Each acoustic parameter was related to at least one measure of male threat potential. The most dimorphic parameters, F0 and Pf, were most strongly related to body size in both samples. In the US sample, F0 predicted testosterone levels, Pf predicted upper body strength and F0-s.d. predicted physical aggressiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21752821      PMCID: PMC3234546          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  30 in total

1.  Changes in the male voice at puberty: vocal fold length and its relationship to the fundamental frequency of the voice.

Authors:  M Harries; S Hawkins; J Hacking; I Hughes
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.469

2.  Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Speaking fundamental frequency: some physical and social correlates.

Authors:  D Graddol; J Swann
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1983 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.500

4.  Men's voices and women's choices.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 5.  The influence of testosterone on human aggression.

Authors:  J Archer
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1991-02

6.  Pitch (F0) and formant profiles of human vowels and vowel-like baboon grunts: the role of vocalizer body size and voice-acoustic allometry.

Authors:  Drew Rendall; Sophie Kollias; Christina Ney; Peter Lloyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Behavioral and physiological responses to anabolic-androgenic steroids.

Authors:  Ann S Clark; Leslie P Henderson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 8.  Testosterone and human aggression: an evaluation of the challenge hypothesis.

Authors:  John Archer
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2005-02-25       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  The role of femininity and averageness of voice pitch in aesthetic judgments of women's voices.

Authors:  David R Feinberg; Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones; David I Perrett
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Women use voice parameters to assess men's characteristics.

Authors:  Laetitia Bruckert; Jean-Sylvain Liénard; André Lacroix; Michel Kreutzer; Gérard Leboucher
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  45 in total

1.  Voice pitch modulation in human mate choice.

Authors:  Katarzyna Pisanski; Anna Oleszkiewicz; Justyna Plachetka; Marzena Gmiterek; David Reby
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Masculine men articulate less clearly.

Authors:  Vera Kempe; David A Puts; Rodrigo A Cárdenas
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2013-12

3.  Vocal fundamental and formant frequencies are honest signals of threat potential in peripubertal males.

Authors:  Carolyn R Hodges-Simeon; Michael Gurven; David A Puts; Steven J C Gaulin
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 2.671

4.  Three-month-old human infants use vocal cues of body size.

Authors:  David Pietraszewski; Annie E Wertz; Gregory A Bryant; Karen Wynn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Sounds like a winner: voice pitch influences perception of leadership capacity in both men and women.

Authors:  Casey A Klofstad; Rindy C Anderson; Susan Peters
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Form and Function in Human Song.

Authors:  Samuel A Mehr; Manvir Singh; Hunter York; Luke Glowacki; Max M Krasnow
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  How well do men's faces and voices index mate quality and dominance?

Authors:  Leslie M Doll; Alexander K Hill; Michelle A Rotella; Rodrigo A Cárdenas; Lisa L M Welling; John R Wheatley; David A Puts
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2014-06

8.  Sexual selection on male vocal fundamental frequency in humans and other anthropoids.

Authors:  David A Puts; Alexander K Hill; Drew H Bailey; Robert S Walker; Drew Rendall; John R Wheatley; Lisa L M Welling; Khytam Dawood; Rodrigo Cárdenas; Robert P Burriss; Nina G Jablonski; Mark D Shriver; Daniel Weiss; Adriano R Lameira; Coren L Apicella; Michael J Owren; Claudia Barelli; Mary E Glenn; Gabriel Ramos-Fernandez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Can blind persons accurately assess body size from the voice?

Authors:  Katarzyna Pisanski; Anna Oleszkiewicz; Agnieszka Sorokowska
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Are men better than women at acoustic size judgements?

Authors:  Benjamin D Charlton; Anna M Taylor; David Reby
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.