Literature DB >> 27122553

Sexual selection on male vocal fundamental frequency in humans and other anthropoids.

David A Puts1, Alexander K Hill2, Drew H Bailey3, Robert S Walker4, Drew Rendall5, John R Wheatley2, Lisa L M Welling6, Khytam Dawood7, Rodrigo Cárdenas7, Robert P Burriss8, Nina G Jablonski2, Mark D Shriver2, Daniel Weiss7, Adriano R Lameira9, Coren L Apicella10, Michael J Owren11, Claudia Barelli12, Mary E Glenn13, Gabriel Ramos-Fernandez14.   

Abstract

In many primates, including humans, the vocalizations of males and females differ dramatically, with male vocalizations and vocal anatomy often seeming to exaggerate apparent body size. These traits may be favoured by sexual selection because low-frequency male vocalizations intimidate rivals and/or attract females, but this hypothesis has not been systematically tested across primates, nor is it clear why competitors and potential mates should attend to vocalization frequencies. Here we show across anthropoids that sexual dimorphism in fundamental frequency (F0) increased during evolutionary transitions towards polygyny, and decreased during transitions towards monogamy. Surprisingly, humans exhibit greater F0 sexual dimorphism than any other ape. We also show that low-F0 vocalizations predict perceptions of men's dominance and attractiveness, and predict hormone profiles (low cortisol and high testosterone) related to immune function. These results suggest that low male F0 signals condition to competitors and mates, and evolved in male anthropoids in response to the intensity of mating competition.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  anthropoid primates; attractiveness; dominance; mating system; sexual selection; vocal fundamental frequency

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27122553      PMCID: PMC4855375          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  35 in total

Review 1.  Sexual selection on human faces and voices.

Authors:  David A Puts; Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2012

Review 2.  Protective buttressing of the hominin face.

Authors:  David R Carrier; Michael H Morgan
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2014-06-09

3.  Evidence for the stress-linked immunocompetence handicap hypothesis in human male faces.

Authors:  F R Moore; R E Cornwell; M J Law Smith; E A S Al Dujaili; M Sharp; D I Perrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Mammalian mating systems.

Authors:  T H Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1989-05-22

5.  Pitch (F0) and formant profiles of human vowels and vowel-like baboon grunts: the role of vocalizer body size and voice-acoustic allometry.

Authors:  Drew Rendall; Sophie Kollias; Christina Ney; Peter Lloyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  What makes a voice masculine: physiological and acoustical correlates of women's ratings of men's vocal masculinity.

Authors:  Valentina Cartei; Rod Bond; David Reby
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.587

7.  Voice pitch alters mate-choice-relevant perception in hunter-gatherers.

Authors:  Coren L Apicella; David R Feinberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Human preferences for sexually dimorphic faces may be evolutionarily novel.

Authors:  Isabel M Scott; Andrew P Clark; Steven C Josephson; Adam H Boyette; Innes C Cuthill; Ruby L Fried; Mhairi A Gibson; Barry S Hewlett; Mark Jamieson; William Jankowiak; P Lynne Honey; Zejun Huang; Melissa A Liebert; Benjamin G Purzycki; John H Shaver; J Josh Snodgrass; Richard Sosis; Lawrence S Sugiyama; Viren Swami; Douglas W Yu; Yangke Zhao; Ian S Penton-Voak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The human operational sex ratio: effects of marriage, concealed ovulation, and menopause on mate competition.

Authors:  Frank W Marlowe; J Colette Berbesque
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 3.895

10.  Physiological stress mediates the honesty of social signals.

Authors:  Gary R Bortolotti; Francois Mougeot; Jesus Martinez-Padilla; Lucy M I Webster; Stuart B Piertney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  23 in total

1.  Voice pitch modulation in human mate choice.

Authors:  Katarzyna Pisanski; Anna Oleszkiewicz; Justyna Plachetka; Marzena Gmiterek; David Reby
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Acoustic allometry and vocal learning in mammals.

Authors:  Maxime Garcia; Andrea Ravignani
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 3.  Vocal modulation in human mating and competition.

Authors:  Susan M Hughes; David A Puts
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Human voice pitch measures are robust across a variety of speech recordings: methodological and theoretical implications.

Authors:  Katarzyna Pisanski; Agata Groyecka-Bernard; Piotr Sorokowski
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 3.812

5.  Rapid evolution of the primate larynx?

Authors:  Daniel L Bowling; Jacob C Dunn; Jeroen B Smaers; Maxime Garcia; Asha Sato; Georg Hantke; Stephan Handschuh; Sabine Dengg; Max Kerney; Andrew C Kitchener; Michaela Gumpenberger; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  The evolution of acoustic size exaggeration in terrestrial mammals.

Authors:  Benjamin D Charlton; David Reby
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  The Perception of Operational Sex Ratios by Voice.

Authors:  John G Neuhoff
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Voice cues are used in a similar way by blind and sighted adults when assessing women's body size.

Authors:  Katarzyna Pisanski; David Feinberg; Anna Oleszkiewicz; Agnieszka Sorokowska
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Harsh is large: nonlinear vocal phenomena lower voice pitch and exaggerate body size.

Authors:  Andrey Anikin; Katarzyna Pisanski; Mathilde Massenet; David Reby
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Honest signals and sexual conflict: Female lizards carry undesirable indicators of quality.

Authors:  Braulio A Assis; Julian D Avery; Catherine Tylan; Heather I Engler; Ryan L Earley; Tracy Langkilde
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.