Literature DB >> 15759713

Pitch (F0) and formant profiles of human vowels and vowel-like baboon grunts: the role of vocalizer body size and voice-acoustic allometry.

Drew Rendall1, Sophie Kollias, Christina Ney, Peter Lloyd.   

Abstract

Key voice features--fundamental frequency (F0) and formant frequencies--can vary extensively between individuals. Much of the variation can be traced to differences in the size of the larynx and vocal-tract cavities, but whether these differences in turn simply reflect differences in speaker body size (i.e., neutral vocal allometry) remains unclear. Quantitative analyses were therefore undertaken to test the relationship between speaker body size and voice F0 and formant frequencies for human vowels. To test the taxonomic generality of the relationships, the same analyses were conducted on the vowel-like grunts of baboons, whose phylogenetic proximity to humans and similar vocal production biology and voice acoustic patterns recommend them for such comparative research. For adults of both species, males were larger than females and had lower mean voice F0 and formant frequencies. However, beyond this, F0 variation did not track body-size variation between the sexes in either species, nor within sexes in humans. In humans, formant variation correlated significantly with speaker height but only in males and not in females. Implications for general vocal allometry are discussed as are implications for speech origins theories, and challenges to them, related to laryngeal position and vocal tract length.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15759713     DOI: 10.1121/1.1848011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  55 in total

1.  A novel coding mechanism for social vocalizations in the lateral amygdala.

Authors:  Marie A Gadziola; Jasmine M S Grimsley; Sharad J Shanbhag; Jeffrey J Wenstrup
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Oestrous red deer hinds prefer male roars with higher fundamental frequencies.

Authors:  David Reby; Benjamin D Charlton; Yann Locatelli; Karen McComb
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Voice processing in human and non-human primates.

Authors:  Pascal Belin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Do age- and sex-related variations reliably reflect body size in non-human primate vocalizations? A review.

Authors:  E Ey; D Pfefferle; J Fischer
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 2.163

5.  Masculine voices signal men's threat potential in forager and industrial societies.

Authors:  David A Puts; Coren L Apicella; Rodrigo A Cárdenas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Masking Release for Speech-in-Speech Recognition Due to a Target/Masker Sex Mismatch in Children With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Jenna M Browning; Emily Buss
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Masculine men articulate less clearly.

Authors:  Vera Kempe; David A Puts; Rodrigo A Cárdenas
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2013-12

8.  Modification of spectral features by nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Daniel J Weiss; Cara F Hotchkin; Susan E Parks
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 12.579

9.  Effects of Aging on Vocal Fundamental Frequency and Vowel Formants in Men and Women.

Authors:  Julie Traub Eichhorn; Raymond D Kent; Diane Austin; Houri K Vorperian
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Fear conditioned discrimination of frequency modulated sweeps within species-specific calls of mustached bats.

Authors:  Jie Ma; Robert T Naumann; Jagmeet S Kanwal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.