Literature DB >> 23720522

Are men better than women at acoustic size judgements?

Benjamin D Charlton1, Anna M Taylor, David Reby.   

Abstract

Formants are important phonetic elements of human speech that are also used by humans and non-human mammals to assess the body size of potential mates and rivals. As a consequence, it has been suggested that formant perception, which is crucial for speech perception, may have evolved through sexual selection. Somewhat surprisingly, though, no previous studies have examined whether sexes differ in their ability to use formants for size evaluation. Here, we investigated whether men and women differ in their ability to use the formant frequency spacing of synthetic vocal stimuli to make auditory size judgements over a wide range of fundamental frequencies (the main determinant of vocal pitch). Our results reveal that men are significantly better than women at comparing the apparent size of stimuli, and that lower pitch improves the ability of both men and women to perform these acoustic size judgements. These findings constitute the first demonstration of a sex difference in formant perception, and lend support to the idea that acoustic size normalization, a crucial prerequisite for speech perception, may have been sexually selected through male competition. We also provide the first evidence that vocalizations with relatively low pitch improve the perception of size-related formant information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acoustic cues to size; formants; vocal communication

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23720522      PMCID: PMC3730639          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  11 in total

1.  Cues to body size in the formant spacing of male koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) bellows: honesty in an exaggerated trait.

Authors:  Benjamin D Charlton; William A H Ellis; Allan J McKinnon; Gary J Cowin; Jacqui Brumm; Karen Nilsson; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Masculine voices signal men's threat potential in forager and industrial societies.

Authors:  David A Puts; Coren L Apicella; Rodrigo A Cárdenas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The prioritization of voice fundamental frequency or formants in listeners' assessments of speaker size, masculinity, and attractiveness.

Authors:  Katarzyna Pisanski; Drew Rendall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Fundamental frequency and vowel perception.

Authors:  J H Ryalls; P Lieberman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Relationships between vocal characteristics and body size and shape in human males: an evolutionary explanation for a deep male voice.

Authors:  Sarah Evans; Nick Neave; Delia Wakelin
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 3.251

6.  Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: a study using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  W T Fitch; J Giedd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Sex differences in performance and hemispheric organization for a nonverbal auditory task.

Authors:  G W McRoberts; B Sanders
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-02

8.  Women use voice parameters to assess men's characteristics.

Authors:  Laetitia Bruckert; Jean-Sylvain Liénard; André Lacroix; Michel Kreutzer; Gérard Leboucher
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  The processing and perception of size information in speech sounds.

Authors:  David R R Smith; Roy D Patterson; Richard Turner; Hideki Kawahara; Toshio Irino
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Individual differences in the discrimination of novel speech sounds: effects of sex, temporal processing, musical and cognitive abilities.

Authors:  Vera Kempe; John C Thoresen; Neil W Kirk; Felix Schaeffler; Patricia J Brooks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Vocal size exaggeration may have contributed to the origins of vocalic complexity.

Authors:  Katarzyna Pisanski; Andrey Anikin; David Reby
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Set the tone: Trustworthy and dominant novel voices classification using explicit judgement and machine learning techniques.

Authors:  Cyrielle Chappuis; Didier Grandjean
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Can blind persons accurately assess body size from the voice?

Authors:  Katarzyna Pisanski; Anna Oleszkiewicz; Agnieszka Sorokowska
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Intrasexual selection drives sensitivity to pitch, formants and duration in the competitive calls of fallow bucks.

Authors:  Benjamin J Pitcher; Elodie F Briefer; Alan G McElligott
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Voice cues are used in a similar way by blind and sighted adults when assessing women's body size.

Authors:  Katarzyna Pisanski; David Feinberg; Anna Oleszkiewicz; Agnieszka Sorokowska
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Acoustic characteristics used by Japanese macaques for individual discrimination.

Authors:  Takafumi Furuyama; Kohta I Kobayasi; Hiroshi Riquimaroux
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Human roars communicate upper-body strength more effectively than do screams or aggressive and distressed speech.

Authors:  Jordan Raine; Katarzyna Pisanski; Rod Bond; Julia Simner; David Reby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Human Listeners Can Accurately Judge Strength and Height Relative to Self from Aggressive Roars and Speech.

Authors:  Jordan Raine; Katarzyna Pisanski; Anna Oleszkiewicz; Julia Simner; David Reby
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2018-06-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.