BACKGROUND: Only limited data are available on the development and feasibility piloting of school-based interventions to prevent and reduce obesity in children. Clear documentation of the rationale, process of development and content of such interventions is essential to enable other researchers to understand why interventions succeed or fail. METHODS: This paper describes the development of the Healthy Lifestyles Programme (HeLP), a school-based intervention to prevent obesity in children, through the first 4 steps of the Intervention Mapping protocol (IM). The intervention focuses on the following health behaviours, i) reduction of the consumption of sweetened fizzy drinks, ii) increase in the proportion of healthy snacks consumed and iii) reduction of TV viewing and other screen-based activities, within the context of a wider attempt to improve diet and increase physical activity. RESULTS: Two phases of pilot work demonstrated that the intervention was acceptable and feasible for schools, children and their families and suggested areas for further refinement. Feedback from the first pilot phase suggested that the 9-10 year olds were both receptive to the messages and more able and willing to translate them into possible behaviour changes than older or younger children and engaged their families to the greatest extent. Performance objectives were mapped onto 3 three broad domains of behaviour change objectives--establish motivation, take action and stay motivated--in order to create an intervention that supports and enables behaviour change. Activities include whole school assemblies, parents evenings, sport/dance workshops, classroom based education lessons, interactive drama workshops and goal setting and runs over three school terms. CONCLUSION: The Intervention Mapping protocol was a useful tool in developing a feasible, theory based intervention aimed at motivating children and their families to make small sustainable changes to their eating and activity behaviours. Although the process was time consuming, this systematic approach ensures that the behaviour change techniques and delivery methods link directly to the Programme's performance objectives and their associated determinants. This in turn provides a clear framework for process analysis and increases the potential of the intervention to realise the desired outcome of preventing and reducing obesity in children.
BACKGROUND: Only limited data are available on the development and feasibility piloting of school-based interventions to prevent and reduce obesity in children. Clear documentation of the rationale, process of development and content of such interventions is essential to enable other researchers to understand why interventions succeed or fail. METHODS: This paper describes the development of the Healthy Lifestyles Programme (HeLP), a school-based intervention to prevent obesity in children, through the first 4 steps of the Intervention Mapping protocol (IM). The intervention focuses on the following health behaviours, i) reduction of the consumption of sweetened fizzy drinks, ii) increase in the proportion of healthy snacks consumed and iii) reduction of TV viewing and other screen-based activities, within the context of a wider attempt to improve diet and increase physical activity. RESULTS: Two phases of pilot work demonstrated that the intervention was acceptable and feasible for schools, children and their families and suggested areas for further refinement. Feedback from the first pilot phase suggested that the 9-10 year olds were both receptive to the messages and more able and willing to translate them into possible behaviour changes than older or younger children and engaged their families to the greatest extent. Performance objectives were mapped onto 3 three broad domains of behaviour change objectives--establish motivation, take action and stay motivated--in order to create an intervention that supports and enables behaviour change. Activities include whole school assemblies, parents evenings, sport/dance workshops, classroom based education lessons, interactive drama workshops and goal setting and runs over three school terms. CONCLUSION: The Intervention Mapping protocol was a useful tool in developing a feasible, theory based intervention aimed at motivating children and their families to make small sustainable changes to their eating and activity behaviours. Although the process was time consuming, this systematic approach ensures that the behaviour change techniques and delivery methods link directly to the Programme's performance objectives and their associated determinants. This in turn provides a clear framework for process analysis and increases the potential of the intervention to realise the desired outcome of preventing and reducing obesity in children.
Authors: Mark A Pereira; Alex I Kartashov; Cara B Ebbeling; Linda Van Horn; Martha L Slattery; David R Jacobs; David S Ludwig Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Jan 1-7 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Chris J Riddoch; Sam D Leary; Andy R Ness; Steven N Blair; Kevin Deere; Calum Mattocks; Alex Griffiths; George Davey Smith; Kate Tilling Journal: BMJ Date: 2009-11-26
Authors: Lindsay R Duncan; Josefa L Martinez; Susan E Rivers; Amy E Latimer; Michelle C Bertoli; Samantha Domingo; Peter Salovey Journal: J Health Psychol Date: 2012-10-01
Authors: Lynne M Boddy; Zoe R Knowles; Ian G Davies; Genevieve L Warburton; Kelly A Mackintosh; Laura Houghton; Stuart J Fairclough Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-08-29 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Emma J Tavender; Marije Bosch; Russell L Gruen; Sally E Green; Susan Michie; Sue E Brennan; Jill J Francis; Jennie L Ponsford; Jonathan C Knott; Sue Meares; Tracy Smyth; Denise A O'Connor Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2015-05-25 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Leon Poltawski; Charles Abraham; Anne Forster; Victoria A Goodwin; Cherry Kilbride; Rod S Taylor; Sarah Dean Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2013-10-01 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Katrina M Wyatt; Jennifer J Lloyd; Charles Abraham; Siobhan Creanor; Sarah Dean; Emma Densham; Wendy Daurge; Colin Green; Melvyn Hillsdon; Virginia Pearson; Rod S Taylor; Richard Tomlinson; Stuart Logan Journal: Trials Date: 2013-04-04 Impact factor: 2.279