Literature DB >> 10878689

Liquid versus solid carbohydrate: effects on food intake and body weight.

D P DiMeglio1, R D Mattes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Beverages are contributing an increased proportion of energy to the diet. Because they elicit a weak compensatory dietary response, they may increase risk of positive energy balance.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to document the differential effects of matched liquid and solid carbohydrate loads on diet and body weight.
DESIGN: In a cross-over design, seven males and eight females consumed dietary carbohydrate loads of 1880 kJ/day as a liquid (soda) or solid (jelly beans) during two 4 week periods separated by a 4 week washout. Subjects were permitted to consume the loads however they chose. In addition to baseline measurements, diet records were obtained on random days throughout the study, body composition was measured weekly, physical activity was assessed before and after treatments and hunger was assessed during washout and midway through each treatment.
RESULTS: Free-feeding energy intake during the solid period was significantly lower than intake prior to this period. Dietary energy compensation was precise (118%). No decrease in free-feeding energy intake occurred during the liquid period. Total daily energy intake increased by an amount equal to the load resulting in dietary compensation of -17%. Consequently, body weight and BMI increased significantly only during the liquid period. Physical activity and hunger were unchanged.
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that liquid carbohydrate promotes positive energy balance, whereas a comparable solid carbohydrate elicits precise dietary compensation. Increased consumption of energy-yielding fluids may promote positive energy balance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10878689     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord


  223 in total

1.  Food Groups and Risk of Overweight, Obesity, and Weight Gain: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies.

Authors:  Sabrina Schlesinger; Manuela Neuenschwander; Carolina Schwedhelm; Georg Hoffmann; Angela Bechthold; Heiner Boeing; Lukas Schwingshackl
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 8.701

2.  Rats that binge eat fat-rich food do not show somatic signs or anxiety associated with opiate-like withdrawal: implications for nutrient-specific food addiction behaviors.

Authors:  Miriam E Bocarsly; Laura A Berner; Bartley G Hoebel; Nicole M Avena
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-05-24

Review 3.  Sugar-sweetened and artificially-sweetened beverages in relation to obesity risk.

Authors:  Mark A Pereira
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 4.  Drinking to our health: can beverage companies cut calories while maintaining profits?

Authors:  S Kleiman; S W Ng; B Popkin
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 9.213

5.  Intake of soft drinks, fruit-flavored beverages, and fruits and vegetables by children in grades 4 through 6.

Authors:  Karen Weber Cullen; Danielle M Ash; Carla Warneke; Carl de Moor
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Sugar-sweetened beverage taxes in Brazil.

Authors:  Rafael M Claro; Renata B Levy; Barry M Popkin; Carlos A Monteiro
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Beverage consumption, appetite, and energy intake: what did you expect?

Authors:  Bridget A Cassady; Robert V Considine; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Drinking caloric beverages increases the risk of adverse cardiometabolic outcomes in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study.

Authors:  Kiyah J Duffey; Penny Gordon-Larsen; Lyn M Steffen; David R Jacobs; Barry M Popkin
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  Soup preloads in a variety of forms reduce meal energy intake.

Authors:  Julie E Flood; Barbara J Rolls
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2007-04-14       Impact factor: 3.868

10.  Differential effects of high consumption of fructose or glucose on mesenteric arterial function in female rats.

Authors:  Sonali Shaligram; Gemma Sangüesa; Farjana Akther; Marta Alegret; Juan C Laguna; Roshanak Rahimian
Journal:  J Nutr Biochem       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 6.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.