Literature DB >> 26590825

The effect of water suppression on the hepatic lipid quantification, as assessed by the LCModel, in a preclinical and clinical scenario.

Amandine Coum1,2, Fanny Noury3,4, Elise Bannier5, Karima Begriche6, Bernard Fromenty6, Yves Gandon5, Hervé Saint-Jalmes3,4,7, Giulio Gambarota3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of water suppression on the hepatic lipid quantification, using the LCModel.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR spectra with and without water suppression were acquired in the liver of mice at 4.7 T and patients at 3 T, and processed with the LCModel. The Cramér-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB) values of the seven lipid resonances were determined to assess the impact of water suppression on hepatic lipid quantification. A paired t test was used for comparison between the CRLBs obtained with and without water suppression.
RESULTS: For the preclinical data, in the high (low) fat fraction subset an overall impairment in hepatic lipid quantification, i.e. an increase of CRLBs (no significant change of CRLBs) was observed in spectra acquired with water suppression. For the clinical data, there were no substantial changes in the CRLB with water suppression. Because (1) the water suppression does not overall improve the quantification of the lipid resonances and (2) the MR spectrum without water suppression is always acquired for fat fraction calculation, the optimal data-acquisition strategy for liver MRS is to acquire only the MR spectrum without water suppression.
CONCLUSION: For quantification of hepatic lipid resonances, it is advantageous to perform MR spectroscopy without water suppression in a clinical and preclinical scenario (at moderate fields).

Entities:  

Keywords:  1H-MRS; Lipids; Liver; Quantification; Water suppression

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26590825     DOI: 10.1007/s10334-015-0508-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.310


  29 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative Assessment of Liver Fat with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Irene Cruite; Gavin Hamilton; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  (1)H MR spectroscopy of skeletal muscle, liver and bone marrow.

Authors:  Jürgen Machann; Norbert Stefan; Fritz Schick
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Non-invasive quantification of triglyceride content in steatotic rat livers by (1)H-MRS: when water meets (too much) fat.

Authors:  Michal Heger; Hendrik A Marsman; Rick Bezemer; Martijn A Cloos; Rowan F van Golen; Thomas M van Gulik
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Noninvasive quantification of hepatic steatosis in rats using 3.0 T 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  H A Marsman; J R van Werven; A J Nederveen; F J Ten Kate; M Heger; J Stoker; T M van Gulik
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  WET, a T1- and B1-insensitive water-suppression method for in vivo localized 1H NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  R J Ogg; P B Kingsley; J S Taylor
Journal:  J Magn Reson B       Date:  1994-05

6.  Quantification of liver fat using magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  C Thomsen; U Becker; K Winkler; P Christoffersen; M Jensen; O Henriksen
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Non-invasive assessment of hepatic fat accumulation in chronic hepatitis C by 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Martin Krssák; Harald Hofer; Fritz Wrba; Martin Meyerspeer; Attila Brehm; Alfred Lohninger; Petra Steindl-Munda; Ewald Moser; Peter Ferenci; Michael Roden
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 8.  Obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: biochemical, metabolic, and clinical implications.

Authors:  Elisa Fabbrini; Shelby Sullivan; Samuel Klein
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 17.425

9.  Estimation of metabolite concentrations from localized in vivo proton NMR spectra.

Authors:  S W Provencher
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Liver fat content in type 2 diabetes: relationship with hepatic perfusion and substrate metabolism.

Authors:  Luuk J Rijzewijk; Rutger W van der Meer; Mark Lubberink; Hildo J Lamb; Johannes A Romijn; Albert de Roos; Jos W Twisk; Robert J Heine; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Johannes W A Smit; Michaela Diamant
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 9.461

View more
  1 in total

1.  Quantification of Hepatic Lipid Using 7.0T Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Computed Tomography in Mild Alcoholic Steatotic Mice.

Authors:  Qi Cao; Su Xu; Shujing Li; Minjie Chen; Xicui Sun; Yamin Wan; Liya Pi; Zhekang Ying; Bin Ren
Journal:  J Liver       Date:  2018-12-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.