Literature DB >> 16084873

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis reduces pregnancy loss in women aged 35 years and older with a history of recurrent miscarriages.

Santiago Munné1, Serena Chen, Jill Fischer, Pere Colls, Xuezong Zheng, John Stevens, Tomas Escudero, Maria Oter, Bill Schoolcraft, Joe Leigh Simpson, Jacques Cohen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and transfer of euploid embryos would decrease spontaneous abortion rates in recurrent miscarriage (RM) patients.
DESIGN: Controlled clinical study.
SETTING: In vitro fertilization centers and PGD reference laboratory. PATIENT(S): Recurrent-miscarriage patients with three or more prior lost pregnancies with no known etiology. INTERVENTION(S): Biopsy of a single blastomere from each day 3 embryo, followed by fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The rate of spontaneous abortions in RM subjects undergoing PGD were compared with [1] their own a priori expectations and [2] a comparison group of women undergoing PGD for advanced maternal age (> or =35 years). RESULT(S): Before PGD, RM patients had lost 87% (262/301) of their pregnancies, with an expected loss rate of 36.5%. After, they only lost 16.7% pregnancies. This difference was mostly due to reduction in pregnancy loss in the > or =35-years age subgroup, to 12% from an expected 44.5%. CONCLUSION(S): Preimplantation genetic diagnosis aneuploidy screening has a beneficial effect on pregnancy outcome in RM couples, especially those in which the woman is aged > or =35 years. Our data indicate that PGD reduces the risk of miscarriage in RM patients to baseline levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16084873     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.02.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  32 in total

Review 1.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: present and future.

Authors:  Elpida Fragouli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with trophectoderm biopsy.

Authors:  Wendy Y Zhang; Frauke von Versen-Höynck; Kristopher I Kapphahn; Raquel R Fleischmann; Qianying Zhao; Valerie L Baker
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 3.  PGS-FISH in reproductive medicine and perspective directions for improvement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sandra Zamora; Ana Clavero; M Carmen Gonzalvo; Juan de Dios Luna Del Castillo; Jose Antonio Roldán-Nofuentes; Juan Mozas; Jose Antonio Castilla
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Preimplantation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo?

Authors:  Kim Dao Ly; Ashok Agarwal; Zsolt Peter Nagy
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  The state of "freeze-for-all" in human ARTs.

Authors:  Natalia Basile; Juan A Garcia-Velasco
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Nonviable human pre-implantation embryos as a source of stem cells for research and potential therapy.

Authors:  Mina Alikani; Santiago Munné
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.739

7.  In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening improves implantation and live birth in women age 40 through 43.

Authors:  Hsiao-Ling Lee; David H McCulloh; Brooke Hodes-Wertz; Alexis Adler; Caroline McCaffrey; James A Grifo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  Genetic considerations in recurrent pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Kassie J Hyde; Danny J Schust
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 9.  The Importance of an Evidence-based Workup for Recurrent Pregnancy Loss.

Authors:  Karen J Gibbins; T Flint Porter
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.190

Review 10.  Biological versus chronological ovarian age: implications for assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Carlo Alviggi; Peter Humaidan; Colin M Howles; Donald Tredway; Stephen G Hillier
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.