Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Can we improve adenoma detection rates? A systematic review of intervention studies.

Literature DB >> 21741643

Can we improve adenoma detection rates? A systematic review of intervention studies.

Douglas A Corley¹, Christopher D Jensen, Amy R Marks.

Abstract

Entities: Chemical

Mesh：

Year: 2011 PMID： 21741643 DOI： 10.1016/j.gie.2011.04.017

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gastrointest Endosc ISSN： 0016-5107 Impact factor: 9.427

Keyword Cloud
Cited

× No keyword cloud information.

37 in total

Review 1. Quality in Colonoscopy.

Authors: Katherine T Brunner; Audrey H Calderwood
Journal: Curr Gastroenterol Rep Date: 2015-10

Review 2. [International status colorectal cancer screening and quality assurance of screening-colonoscopy].

Authors: Nikolaus Patera; Claudia Wild
Journal: Wien Med Wochenschr Date: 2013-09-05

3. Stability of increased adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Follow-up of an endoscopic quality improvement program-EQUIP-II.

Authors: Vivian Ussui; Susan Coe; Cynthia Rizk; Julia E Crook; Nancy N Diehl; Michael B Wallace
Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-09-30 Impact factor: 10.864

4. Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors: Douglas K Rex; Philip S Schoenfeld; Jonathan Cohen; Irving M Pike; Douglas G Adler; M Brian Fennerty; John G Lieb; Walter G Park; Maged K Rizk; Mandeep S Sawhney; Nicholas J Shaheen; Sachin Wani; David S Weinberg
Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 10.864

5. Effects of the no interruption zone on distraction levels, withdrawal times, and adenoma detection rates of colonoscopy.

Authors: Nancy S Behazin; Michelle Thompson; Mena Milad; Jeffrey Hart; Juhee Song; Mark Jeffries; Dawn M Sears
Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2014-10-18 Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6. Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative.

Authors: Michal F Kaminski; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Marek Bugajski; Michael Bretthauer; Colin J Rees; Evelien Dekker; Geir Hoff; Rodrigo Jover; Stepan Suchanek; Monika Ferlitsch; John Anderson; Thomas Roesch; Rolf Hultcranz; Istvan Racz; Ernst J Kuipers; Kjetil Garborg; James E East; Maciej Rupinski; Birgitte Seip; Cathy Bennett; Carlo Senore; Silvia Minozzi; Raf Bisschops; Dirk Domagk; Roland Valori; Cristiano Spada; Cesare Hassan; Mario Dinis-Ribeiro; Matthew D Rutter
Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2017-03-16 Impact factor: 4.623

Can we improve adenoma detection rates? A systematic review of intervention studies.

Review 1. Quality in Colonoscopy.

Review 2. [International status colorectal cancer screening and quality assurance of screening-colonoscopy].

3. Stability of increased adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Follow-up of an endoscopic quality improvement program-EQUIP-II.

4. Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

5. Effects of the no interruption zone on distraction levels, withdrawal times, and adenoma detection rates of colonoscopy.

Review 6. Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative.

7. Detection rates of premalignant polyps during screening colonoscopy: time to revise quality standards?

8. Physician characteristics associated with higher adenoma detection rate.

9. Public reporting of colonoscopy quality is associated with an increase in endoscopist adenoma detection rate.

10. Quality indicators for colorectal cancer screening for colonoscopy^.