Literature DB >> 21737834

In vivo shoulder function after surgical repair of a torn rotator cuff: glenohumeral joint mechanics, shoulder strength, clinical outcomes, and their interaction.

Michael J Bey1, Cathryn D Peltz, Kristin Ciarelli, Stephanie K Kline, George W Divine, Marnix van Holsbeeck, Stephanie Muh, Patricia A Kolowich, Terrence R Lock, Vasilios Moutzouros.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical repair of a torn rotator cuff is based on the belief that repairing the tear is necessary to restore normal glenohumeral joint (GHJ) mechanics and achieve a satisfactory clinical outcome. HYPOTHESIS: Dynamic joint function is not completely restored by rotator cuff repair, thus compromising shoulder function and potentially leading to long-term disability. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study and Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: Twenty-one rotator cuff patients and 35 control participants enrolled in the study. Biplane radiographic images were acquired bilaterally from each patient during coronal-plane abduction. Rotator cuff patients were tested at 3, 12, and 24 months after repair of a supraspinatus tendon tear. Control participants were tested once. Glenohumeral joint kinematics and joint contact patterns were accurately determined from the biplane radiographic images. Isometric shoulder strength and patient-reported outcomes were measured at each time point. Ultrasound imaging assessed rotator cuff integrity at 24 months after surgery.
RESULTS: Twenty of 21 rotator cuff repairs appeared intact at 24 months after surgery. The humerus of the patients' repaired shoulder was positioned more superiorly on the glenoid than both the patients' contralateral shoulder and the dominant shoulder of control participants. Patient-reported outcomes improved significantly over time. Shoulder strength also increased over time, although strength deficits persisted at 24 months for most patients. Changes over time in GHJ mechanics were not detected for either the rotator cuff patients' repaired or contralateral shoulders. Clinical outcome was associated with shoulder strength but not GHJ mechanics.
CONCLUSION: Surgical repair of an isolated supraspinatus tear may be sufficient to keep the torn rotator cuff intact and achieve satisfactory patient-reported outcomes, but GHJ mechanics and shoulder strength are not fully restored with current repair techniques. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The study suggests that current surgical repair techniques may be effective for reducing pain but have not yet been optimized for restoring long-term shoulder function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21737834      PMCID: PMC4601100          DOI: 10.1177/0363546511412164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  69 in total

1.  Glenohumeral mechanics: a study of articular geometry, contact, and kinematics.

Authors:  R Kelkar; V M Wang; E L Flatow; P M Newton; G A Ateshian; L U Bigliani; R J Pawluk; V C Mow
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Biomechanical effects of supraspinatus repair on the glenohumeral joint.

Authors:  Jack Yu; Michelle H McGarry; Yeon-Soo Lee; Long V Duong; Thay Q Lee
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Validation of a new model-based tracking technique for measuring three-dimensional, in vivo glenohumeral joint kinematics.

Authors:  Michael J Bey; Roger Zauel; Stephanie K Brock; Scott Tashman
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Exercise in the treatment of rotator cuff impingement: a systematic review and a synthesized evidence-based rehabilitation protocol.

Authors:  John E Kuhn
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  A stereophotogrammetric method for determining in situ contact areas in diarthrodial joints, and a comparison with other methods.

Authors:  G A Ateshian; S D Kwak; L J Soslowsky; V C Mow
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Shoulder kinematics with two-plane x-ray evaluation in patients with anterior instability or rotator cuff tearing.

Authors:  G A Paletta; J J Warner; R F Warren; A Deutsch; D W Altchek
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Functional outcome and health-related quality of life after surgical repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tear using a mini-open technique.

Authors:  Deniz Baysal; Robert Balyk; David Otto; Charlene Luciak-Corea; Lauren Beaupre
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Shoulder impingement: biomechanical considerations in rehabilitation.

Authors:  Paula M Ludewig; Jonathan P Braman
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2011-02

9.  Functional and anatomical results after rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  D F Gazielly; P Gleyze; C Montagnon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Early loading in physiotherapy treatment after full-thickness rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized pilot-study with a two-year follow-up.

Authors:  Ingrid Hultenheim Klintberg; Ann-Christine Gunnarsson; Ulla Svantesson; Jorma Styf; Jòn Karlsson
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 3.477

View more
  23 in total

1.  Measuring Three-Dimensional Thorax Motion Via Biplane Radiographic Imaging: Technique and Preliminary Results.

Authors:  Timothy G Baumer; Joshua W Giles; Anne Drake; Roger Zauel; Michael J Bey
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  The effect of Medicaid payer status on patient outcomes following repair of massive rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  V Sabesan; J Whaley; G Petersen-Fitts; A Sherwood; M Sweet; D J L Lima; D Malone
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-11-28

3.  Comparison of dynamics in 3D glenohumeral position between primary dislocated shoulders and contralateral healthy shoulders.

Authors:  Doo Sup Kim; Bonggun Lee; Scott A Banks; Kyungjin Hong; Young Hwan Jang
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-01-07

4.  In vitro quantification of the performance of model-based mono-planar and bi-planar fluoroscopy for 3D joint kinematics estimation.

Authors:  Luca Tersi; Arnaud Barré; Silvia Fantozzi; Rita Stagni
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Glenohumeral and scapulohumeral kinematic analysis of patients with traumatic anterior instability wearing a shoulder brace: a prospective laboratory study.

Authors:  F Dellabiancia; I Parel; M V Filippi; G Porcellini; G Merolla
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-07-29

6.  Associations between in-vivo glenohumeral joint motion and morphology.

Authors:  Cathryn D Peltz; George Divine; Anne Drake; Nicole L Ramo; Roger Zauel; Vasilios Moutzouros; Michael J Bey
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Effects of asymptomatic rotator cuff pathology on in vivo shoulder motion and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Timothy G Baumer; Jack Dischler; Veronica Mende; Roger Zauel; Marnix van Holsbeeck; Daniel S Siegal; George Divine; Vasilios Moutzouros; Michael J Bey
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Exercise therapy for treatment of supraspinatus tears does not alter glenohumeral kinematics during internal/external rotation with the arm at the side.

Authors:  Gerald A Ferrer; R Matthew Miller; Jason P Zlotnicki; Scott Tashman; James J Irrgang; Volker Musahl; Richard E Debski
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Arthroscopic treatment for cuff tear: strength recovery at 12 months of follow-up.

Authors:  Michele Arcangelo Verdano; Andrea Pellegrini; Giacomo Scita; Cosimo Costantino; Francesco Ceccarelli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2013-01-29

10.  Instantaneous helical axis estimation of glenohumeral kinematics: The impact of rotator cuff pathology.

Authors:  Rebekah L Lawrence; Matthew C Ruder; Roger Zauel; Michael J Bey
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.