Literature DB >> 28123261

Comparison of dynamics in 3D glenohumeral position between primary dislocated shoulders and contralateral healthy shoulders.

Doo Sup Kim1, Bonggun Lee2, Scott A Banks3, Kyungjin Hong1, Young Hwan Jang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS: After shoulder dislocation, kinematic changes in shoulder, including translation of the humeral head, ensue. There have been many attempts to measure these changes using motion measurement techniques, but in vivo three-dimensional (3D) glenohumeral changes have not been appreciated until now. The purpose of this study was to measure and analyze changes in glenohumeral translation in patients with shoulder dislocation and compare these changes with healthy shoulder.
METHODS: We included 20 subjects who had suffered shoulder dislocation for first time, and 3D models of their humerus and scapula were obtained using computed tomography and fluoroscopic images during scapular plane abduction and external rotation of shoulder with elbow flexed at 90° and arm abducted at 90°. We measured the superior/inferior (SI) and anterior/posterior (AP) translations for both shoulders.
RESULTS: No statistically significant difference between healthy and dislocated shoulders was detected in SI translation for scapular plane abduction with increasing elevation angles. In AP translation, the humeral head was located 2.29 mm more anteriorly in the dislocated shoulder than in the healthy shoulder. However, no statistically significant difference was seen. For internal to external rotation, the angle of the rotated arm had an effect on AP translation. However, no statistically significant difference was detected. In the apprehension test, there was no significant difference in the mean value of AP translation.
CONCLUSION: Compared with the contralateral healthy shoulder, changes in glenohumeral translation during in vivo movement after shoulder dislocation were found to be non-significant.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dislocation; In vivo; Kinematics; Shoulder; Translation

Year:  2017        PMID: 28123261      PMCID: PMC5222949          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2016.12.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  15 in total

1.  Acute arthroscopic Bankart repair?

Authors:  R A Arciero
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Position of immobilization after dislocation of the glenohumeral joint. A study with use of magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  E Itoi; R Sashi; H Minagawa; T Shimizu; I Wakabayashi; K Sato
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  THE RESULTS OF OPERATIVE TREATMENT OF RECURRENT DISLOCATIONS OF THE SHOULDER.

Authors:  C R ROWE
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1963-12       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Prognosis in dislocations of the shoulder.

Authors:  C R ROWE
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1956-10       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  [Shoulder instability. Classification and treatment].

Authors:  P Habermeyer; P Magosch; S Lichtenberg
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Validation of a new model-based tracking technique for measuring three-dimensional, in vivo glenohumeral joint kinematics.

Authors:  Michael J Bey; Roger Zauel; Stephanie K Brock; Scott Tashman
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Measuring dynamic in-vivo glenohumeral joint kinematics: technique and preliminary results.

Authors:  Michael J Bey; Stephanie K Kline; Roger Zauel; Terrence R Lock; Patricia A Kolowich
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Primary repair versus conservative treatment of first-time traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder: a randomized study with 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Bent Wulff Jakobsen; Hans Viggo Johannsen; Peter Suder; Jens Ole Søjbjerg
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  In vivo shoulder function after surgical repair of a torn rotator cuff: glenohumeral joint mechanics, shoulder strength, clinical outcomes, and their interaction.

Authors:  Michael J Bey; Cathryn D Peltz; Kristin Ciarelli; Stephanie K Kline; George W Divine; Marnix van Holsbeeck; Stephanie Muh; Patricia A Kolowich; Terrence R Lock; Vasilios Moutzouros
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Results of arthroscopic capsulolabral repair: Bankart lesion versus anterior labroligamentous periosteal sleeve avulsion lesion.

Authors:  Mehmet Ozbaydar; Bassem Elhassan; David Diller; Daniel Massimini; Laurence D Higgins; Jon J P Warner
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  1 in total

1.  Trueness and precision of scanning abutment impressions and stone models according to dental CAD/CAM evaluation standards.

Authors:  Jin-Hun Jeon; Seong-Sig Hwang; Ji-Hwan Kim; Woong-Chul Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 1.904

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.