Literature DB >> 21729064

Assortative mating by fitness and sexually antagonistic genetic variation.

Göran Arnqvist1.   

Abstract

Recent documentations of sexually antagonistic genetic variation in fitness have spurred an interest in the mechanisms that may act to maintain such variation in natural populations. Using individual-based simulations, I show that positive assortative mating by fitness increases the amount of sexually antagonistic genetic variance in fitness, primarily by elevating the equilibrium frequency of heterozygotes, over most of the range of sex-specific selection and dominance. Further, although the effects of assortative mating by fitness on the protection conditions of polymorphism in sexually antagonistic loci were relatively minor, it widens the protection conditions under most reasonable scenarios (e.g., under heterozygote superiority when fitness is averaged across the sexes) but can also somewhat narrow the protection conditions under other circumstances. The near-ubiquity of assortative mating in nature suggests that it may contribute to upholding standing sexually antagonistic genetic variation in fitness.
© 2011 The Author(s). Evolution© 2011 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21729064     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01270.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  17 in total

1.  Evolution of female choice under intralocus sexual conflict and genotype-by-environment interactions.

Authors:  Xiang-Yi Li; Luke Holman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Balancing selection in species with separate sexes: insights from Fisher's geometric model.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Sexually antagonistic polymorphism in simultaneous hermaphrodites.

Authors:  Crispin Y Jordan; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Genomic Signatures of Sexual Conflict.

Authors:  Katja R Kasimatis; Thomas C Nelson; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.645

5.  Recessive Z-linked lethals and the retention of haplotype diversity in a captive butterfly population.

Authors:  Ilik J Saccheri; Samuel Whiteford; Carl J Yung; Arjen E Van't Hof
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  A general population genetic framework for antagonistic selection that accounts for demography and recurrent mutation.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The effect of epistasis on sexually antagonistic genetic variation.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Nikolas Vellnow; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Sexual conflict maintains variation at an insecticide resistance locus.

Authors:  Wayne G Rostant; Caroline Kay; Nina Wedell; David J Hosken
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 7.431

9.  Two sexes, one genome: the evolutionary dynamics of intralocus sexual conflict.

Authors:  Tanya M Pennell; Edward H Morrow
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  The scope and strength of sex-specific selection in genome evolution.

Authors:  A E Wright; J E Mank
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 2.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.