Literature DB >> 21724899

Prevalence and genotypic characteristics of Clostridium difficile in a closed and integrated human and swine population.

Keri N Norman1, H Morgan Scott, Roger B Harvey, Bo Norby, Michael E Hume, Kathleen Andrews.   

Abstract

Recently, an apparent rise in the number of cases attributed to community-acquired Clostridium difficile infection has led researchers to explore additional sources of infection. The finding of C. difficile in food animals and retail meat has raised concern about potential food-borne and occupational exposures. The objective of this study was to compare C. difficile isolated from a closed population of healthy individuals consisting of both humans and swine in order to investigate possible food safety and occupational risks for exposure. Using a multistep enrichment isolation technique, we identified 11.8% of the human wastewater samples and 8.6% of the swine samples that were positive for C. difficile. The prevalences of C. difficile in swine production groups differed significantly (P < 0.05); however, the prevalences in the two human occupational group cohorts did not differ significantly (P = 0.81). The majority of the human and swine isolates were similar based on multiple typing methods. The similarity in C. difficile prevalence in the human group cohorts suggests a low occupational hazard, while a greatly decreased prevalence of C. difficile in later-stage swine production groups suggests a diminished risk for food-borne exposure. The similarity of strains in the two host species suggests the possibility of a common environmental source for healthy individuals in a community setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21724899      PMCID: PMC3165271          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.05007-11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  50 in total

1.  Prevalence and diversity of toxigenic Clostridium perfringens and Clostridium difficile among swine herds in the midwest.

Authors:  Ashley A Baker; Ellen Davis; Thomas Rehberger; Daniel Rosener
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Varied prevalence of Clostridium difficile in an integrated swine operation.

Authors:  K N Norman; R B Harvey; H M Scott; M E Hume; K Andrews; A D Brawley
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 3.331

3.  Proton pump inhibitors increase significantly the risk of Clostridium difficile infection in a low-endemicity, non-outbreak hospital setting.

Authors:  B R Dalton; T Lye-Maccannell; E A Henderson; D R Maccannell; T J Louie
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 8.171

4.  Prevalence of Clostridium difficile in diarrhoeic and non-diarrhoeic piglets.

Authors:  Sergio Alvarez-Perez; Jose L Blanco; Emilio Bouza; Patricia Alba; Xavier Gibert; Jaime Maldonado; Marta E Garcia
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Genetic relatedness of Clostridium difficile isolates from various origins determined by triple-locus sequence analysis based on toxin regulatory genes tcdC, tcdR, and cdtR.

Authors:  Philippe J M Bouvet; Michel R Popoff
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Yeast, beef and pork extracts counteract Clostridium difficile toxin A enterotoxicity.

Authors:  Peter I Duncan; Grigorios Fotopoulos; Elisabeth Pasche; Nadine Porta; Isabelle Masserey Elmelegy; Jose-Luis Sanchez-Garcia; Gabriela E Bergonzelli; Irène Corthésy-Theulaz
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 2.742

7.  Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 078 toxinotype V found in diarrhoeal pigs identical to isolates from affected humans.

Authors:  Sylvia B Debast; Leo A M G van Leengoed; Abraham Goorhuis; Celine Harmanus; Ed J Kuijper; Aldert A Bergwerff
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.491

8.  Piglet models of acute or chronic Clostridium difficile illness.

Authors:  Jennifer Steele; Hanping Feng; Nicola Parry; Saul Tzipori
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Clostridium difficile in retail meat products, USA, 2007.

Authors:  J Glenn Songer; Hien T Trinh; George E Killgore; Angela D Thompson; L Clifford McDonald; Brandi M Limbago
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Possible seasonality of Clostridium difficile in retail meat, Canada.

Authors:  Alexander Rodriguez-Palacios; Richard J Reid-Smith; Henry R Staempfli; Danielle Daignault; Nicol Janecko; Brent P Avery; Hayley Martin; Angela D Thomspon; L Clifford McDonald; Brandi Limbago; J Scott Weese
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Clostridium difficile in Food and Animals: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  C Rodriguez; B Taminiau; J Van Broeck; M Delmée; G Daube
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Antimicrobial resistance, toxinotype, and genotypic profiling of Clostridium difficile isolates of swine origin.

Authors:  Pamela R Fry; Siddhartha Thakur; Melanie Abley; Wondwossen A Gebreyes
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Toxigenic Clostridium difficile PCR ribotypes from wastewater treatment plants in southern Switzerland.

Authors:  Vincenza Romano; Vincenzo Pasquale; Karel Krovacek; Federica Mauri; Antonella Demarta; Stefano Dumontet
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Isolation and characterization of a multidrug-resistant Clostridioides difficile toxinotype V from municipal wastewater treatment plant.

Authors:  Akram Baghani; Mahmood Alimohammadi; Amir Aliramezani; Maliheh Talebi; Alireza Mesdaghinia; Masoumeh Douraghi
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2020-09-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.