Literature DB >> 22518873

Antimicrobial resistance, toxinotype, and genotypic profiling of Clostridium difficile isolates of swine origin.

Pamela R Fry1, Siddhartha Thakur, Melanie Abley, Wondwossen A Gebreyes.   

Abstract

The occurrence of Clostridium difficile infections in patients that do not fulfill the classical risk factors prompted us to investigate new risk factors of disease. The goal of this study was to characterize strains and associated antimicrobial resistance determinants of C. difficile isolated from swine raised in Ohio and North Carolina. Genotypic approaches used include PCR detection, toxinotyping, DNA sequencing, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) DNA fingerprinting. Thirty-one percent (37/119) of isolates carried both tetM and tetW genes. The ermB gene was found in 91% of isolates that were resistant to erythromycin (68/75). Eighty-five percent (521/609) of isolates were toxin gene tcdB and tcdA positive. A total of 81% (494/609) of isolates were positive for cdtB and carry a tcdC gene (a toxin gene negative regulator) with a 39-bp deletion. Overall, 88% (196/223) of pigs carry a single C. difficile strain, while 12% (27/223) of pigs carried multiple strains. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of individual pigs found to carry more than one strain type of C. difficile. A significant difference in toxinotype profiles in the two geographic locations was noted, with a significantly (P < 0.001) higher prevalence of toxinotype V found in North Carolina (84%; 189/224) than in Ohio (55%; 99/181). Overall, the study findings indicate that significant proportions of C. difficile in swine are toxigenic and often are associated with antimicrobial resistance genes, although they are not resistant to drugs that are used to treat C. difficile infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22518873      PMCID: PMC3405606          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.06581-11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  37 in total

Review 1.  Nomenclature for macrolide and macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance determinants.

Authors:  M C Roberts; J Sutcliffe; P Courvalin; L B Jensen; J Rood; H Seppala
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Clostridium difficile toxinotype V, ribotype 078, in animals and humans.

Authors:  Maja Rupnik; Andreas Widmer; Ortrud Zimmermann; Catherine Eckert; Frédéric Barbut
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Isolation of Clostridium difficile from pigs.

Authors:  M A Jones; D Hunter
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1983-03-12       Impact factor: 2.695

4.  Clostridium difficile in Dutch animals: their presence, characteristics and similarities with human isolates.

Authors:  M G J Koene; D Mevius; J A Wagenaar; C Harmanus; M P M Hensgens; A M Meetsma; F F Putirulan; M A P van Bergen; E J Kuijper
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 5.  Mechanisms of resistance to macrolides and lincosamides: nature of the resistance elements and their clinical implications.

Authors:  Roland Leclercq
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2002-01-11       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Genetic analysis of a tetracycline resistance element from Clostridium difficile and its conjugal transfer to and from Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  P Mullany; M Wilks; I Lamb; C Clayton; B Wren; S Tabaqchali
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1990-07

7.  Characterization of polymorphisms in the toxin A and B genes of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  M Rupnik; V Braun; F Soehn; M Janc; M Hofstetter; R Laufenberg-Feldmann; C von Eichel-Streiber
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 2.742

8.  Health care costs and mortality associated with nosocomial diarrhea due to Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Lorraine Kyne; Mary Beth Hamel; Rajashekhar Polavaram; Ciarán P Kelly
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-12-17       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Use of sodium taurocholate to enhance spore recovery on a medium selective for Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  K H Wilson; M J Kennedy; F R Fekety
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  Clostridium difficile infection: new developments in epidemiology and pathogenesis.

Authors:  Maja Rupnik; Mark H Wilcox; Dale N Gerding
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 60.633

View more
  11 in total

1.  Clostridium difficile genotypes in piglet populations in Germany.

Authors:  Alexander Schneeberg; Heinrich Neubauer; Gernot Schmoock; Sylvia Baier; Jürgen Harlizius; Hendrik Nienhoff; Katja Brase; Stefan Zimmermann; Christian Seyboldt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Update on Antimicrobial Resistance in Clostridium difficile: Resistance Mechanisms and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing.

Authors:  Zhong Peng; Dazhi Jin; Hyeun Bum Kim; Charles W Stratton; Bin Wu; Yi-Wei Tang; Xingmin Sun
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  A Clostridium difficile Lineage Endemic to Costa Rican Hospitals Is Multidrug Resistant by Acquisition of Chromosomal Mutations and Novel Mobile Genetic Elements.

Authors:  Gabriel Ramírez-Vargas; Carlos Quesada-Gómez; Luis Acuña-Amador; Diana López-Ureña; Tatiana Murillo; María Del Mar Gamboa-Coronado; Esteban Chaves-Olarte; Nicholas Thomson; Evelyn Rodríguez-Cavallini; César Rodríguez
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Recent advances in the understanding of antibiotic resistance in Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Patrizia Spigaglia
Journal:  Ther Adv Infect Dis       Date:  2016-02

5.  Emergence of Clinical Clostridioides difficile Isolates With Decreased Susceptibility to Vancomycin.

Authors:  Charles Darkoh; Kadiatou Keita; Chioma Odo; Micah Oyaro; Eric L Brown; Cesar A Arias; Blake M Hanson; Herbert L DuPont
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 6.  Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile in animals.

Authors:  J Scott Weese
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 1.279

Review 7.  Conventional and alternative treatment approaches for Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Khalid M Aljarallah
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

8.  Association Between Environmental Factors and Toxigenic Clostridioides difficile Carriage at Hospital Admission.

Authors:  L Silvia Muñoz-Price; Ryan Hanson; Siddhartha Singh; Ann B Nattinger; Annie Penlesky; Blake W Buchan; Nathan A Ledeboer; Kirsten Beyer; Sima Namin; Yuhong Zhou; Liliana E Pezzin
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-01-03

9.  High rate of Clostridium difficile among young adults presenting with diarrhea at two hospitals in Kenya.

Authors:  Micah O Oyaro; Kimberly Plants-Paris; Dayna Bishoff; Paul Malonza; Christopher S Gontier; Herbert L DuPont; Charles Darkoh
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Toxin profiles and antimicrobial resistance patterns among toxigenic clinical isolates of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile.

Authors:  Hamid Heidari; Hadi Sedigh Ebrahim-Saraie; Ali Amanati; Mohammad Motamedifar; Nahal Hadi; Abdollah Bazargani
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.699

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.