Literature DB >> 19778624

Varied prevalence of Clostridium difficile in an integrated swine operation.

K N Norman1, R B Harvey, H M Scott, M E Hume, K Andrews, A D Brawley.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to compare the prevalence of Clostridium difficile (Cd) among different age and production groups of swine in a vertically integrated swine operation in Texas in 2006 and to compare our isolates to other animal and human isolates. Results are based on 131 Cd isolates from 1008 swine fecal samples and pork trim samples (overall prevalence of 13%). The prevalence (number positive/number tested in production type) of Cd was different between the groups (P<or=0.001), and was highest among suckling piglets at 50.0% (61/122), followed by 23.8% (34/143) for lactating sows and effluent from the farrowing barn, 8.4% (10/119) for nursery, 6.5% (4/62) for pork products, 3.9% (15/382) for grower-finisher, and 3.9% (7/180) for breeding boars and sows. Of the 131 isolates, 122 were positive by PCR for both toxins A (tcdA) and B (tcdB) genes, 129 isolates harbored a 39 base pair deletion in the tcdC gene, 120 isolates were toxinotype V, and all 131 of the isolates were positive for the binary toxin gene cdtB. All isolates were resistant to cefoxitin, ciprofloxacin, and imipenem, whereas all were sensitive to metronidazole, piperacillin/tazobactam, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, and vancomycin. The majority of isolates were resistant to clindamycin; resistant or intermediate to ampicillin; and sensitive to tetracycline and chloramphenicol. There was an increased (P</=0.001) number of isolates for the timeframe of September to February compared to March to August.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19778624     DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2009.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaerobe        ISSN: 1075-9964            Impact factor:   3.331


  27 in total

Review 1.  Clostridium difficile in Food and Animals: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  C Rodriguez; B Taminiau; J Van Broeck; M Delmée; G Daube
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Prevalence and genotypic characteristics of Clostridium difficile in a closed and integrated human and swine population.

Authors:  Keri N Norman; H Morgan Scott; Roger B Harvey; Bo Norby; Michael E Hume; Kathleen Andrews
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Sensitivity to antibiotics of Clostridium difficile toxigenic nosocomial strains.

Authors:  Vladimir Beran; Dittmar Chmelar; Jana Vobejdova; Adela Konigova; Jakub Nemec; Josef Tvrdik
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 2.099

4.  Transient fecal shedding and limited animal-to-animal transmission of Clostridium difficile by naturally infected finishing feedlot cattle.

Authors:  Alexander Rodriguez-Palacios; Carrie Pickworth; Steve Loerch; Jeffrey T LeJeune
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Seasonal variations in Clostridium difficile infections are associated with influenza and respiratory syncytial virus activity independently of antibiotic prescriptions: a time series analysis in Quebec, Canada.

Authors:  Rodica Gilca; Elise Fortin; Charles Frenette; Yves Longtin; Marie Gourdeau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Evaluation of four different diagnostic tests to detect Clostridium difficile in piglets.

Authors:  E C Keessen; N E M Hopman; L A M G van Leengoed; A J A M van Asten; C Hermanus; E J Kuijper; L J A Lipman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  The ecology and pathobiology of Clostridium difficile infections: an interdisciplinary challenge.

Authors:  E R Dubberke; D B Haslam; C Lanzas; L D Bobo; C-A D Burnham; Y T Gröhn; P I Tarr
Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 2.702

8.  Clostridium difficile and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus shedding by slaughter-age pigs.

Authors:  J Scott Weese; Joyce Rousseau; Anne Deckert; Sheryl Gow; Richard J Reid-Smith
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Different antibiotic resistance and sporulation properties within multiclonal Clostridium difficile PCR ribotypes 078, 126, and 033 in a single calf farm.

Authors:  Valerija Zidaric; Bart Pardon; Tiago Dos Vultos; Piet Deprez; Michael Sebastiaan Maria Brouwer; Adam P Roberts; Adriano O Henriques; Maja Rupnik
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Genetically diverse Clostridium difficile strains harboring abundant prophages in an estuarine environment.

Authors:  K R Hargreaves; H V Colvin; K V Patel; J J P Clokie; M R J Clokie
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.