Literature DB >> 33611722

An institutional review of hospital resource utilization and patient radiation exposure in shunted idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Tyler Cho1, Daniel Kreatsoulas2, Joel Fritz3, John M McGregor2, Douglas A Hardesty4.   

Abstract

Patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) frequently utilize healthcare services and undergo radiological studies to assess refractory headache symptoms despite cerebrospinal fluid diversion. To delineate the clinical utility of different imaging modalities and to estimate cumulative patient radiation exposure in shunted patients with IIH, we retrospectively reviewed 100 randomly selected patients with IIH and a prior cerebrospinal fluid diversion procedure treated at our institution between July 2010 and August 2018. Patients had an average of 16.3 office (SD ± 13.8), 12.4 emergency department (± 21.0), and 4.6 inpatient (± 5.1) encounters over an average 4.8 years of follow-up. Patients underwent an average of 9.0 head CTs (± 8.1), 10.3 shunt series x-rays (± 11.2), and 4.3 MRIs (± 3.7). Approximated radiation exposure per patient was 21.4 mSv (± 18.7). Radiological studies performed for acute symptoms usually demonstrated no actionable findings (82.5% CTs, 97.5% shunt series x-rays, and 79.6% MRIs). Shunted IIH patients undergo numerous radiological studies and are subject to considerable levels of radiation, yet imaging shows actionable findings in less than 10% percent of radiographic studies. IIH patients may benefit from radiation-reducing protocols and the use of alternative imaging to assess symptoms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emergency department; Idiopathic intracranial hypertension; Imaging; Radiation; Utilization

Year:  2021        PMID: 33611722     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-021-01502-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  36 in total

1.  Measuring Ventricular Width on Cranial Computed Tomography: Feasibility of Dose Reduction in a Custom-Made Adult Phantom.

Authors:  D Daubner; S Spieth; J Cerhova; J Linn; K Kirchhof
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2015-11-13

2.  Lumboperitoneal and Ventriculoperitoneal Shunting for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Demonstrate Comparable Failure and Complication Rates.

Authors:  Tej D Azad; Yi Zhang; Kunal Varshneya; Anand Veeravagu; John K Ratliff; Gordon Li
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in emergency assessment of patients with suspected acute stroke: a prospective comparison.

Authors:  Julio A Chalela; Chelsea S Kidwell; Lauren M Nentwich; Marie Luby; John A Butman; Andrew M Demchuk; Michael D Hill; Nicholas Patronas; Lawrence Latour; Steven Warach
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-01-27       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Introduction of a Dedicated Emergency Department MR Imaging Scanner at the Barrow Neurological Institute.

Authors:  M Buller; J P Karis
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Imaging of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Complications: Comparison of Whole Body Low-Dose Computed Tomography and Radiographic Shunt Series.

Authors:  Saif Afat; Rastislav Pjontek; Hussam A Hamou; Klaus Herz; Omid Nikoubashman; Fabian Bamberg; Marc A Brockmann; Konstantin Nikolaou; Hans Clusmann; Martin Wiesmann; Ahmed E Othman
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  The utility of the plain radiograph "shunt series" in the evaluation of suspected ventriculoperitoneal shunt failure in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Kapil R Desai; James S Babb; John B Amodio
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2007-03-23

7.  Racial and socioeconomic disparities in outcomes following pediatric cerebrospinal fluid shunt procedures.

Authors:  Frank J Attenello; Alvin Ng; Timothy Wen; Steven Y Cen; Nerses Sanossian; Arun P Amar; Gabriel Zada; Mark D Krieger; J Gordon McComb; William J Mack
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Impact of reduced patient life expectancy on potential cancer risks from radiologic imaging.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Igor Shuryak; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de González; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Kwang-Pyo Kim; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Rebecca Lewis; Fred Mettler; Charles Land
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-14

10.  Utility of radiography in suspected ventricular shunt malfunction.

Authors:  Howard Blumstein; Susan Schardt
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 1.484

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.