Literature DB >> 33555417

A chimpanzee recognizes varied acoustical versions of sine-wave and noise-vocoded speech.

Lisa A Heimbauer1, Michael J Beran2, Michael J Owren3.   

Abstract

Previous research demonstrated that a language-trained chimpanzee recognized familiar English words in sine-wave and noise-vocoded forms (Heimbauer et al. Curr Biol 21:1210-1214, 2011). However, those results did not provide information regarding processing strategies of the specific acoustic cues to which the chimpanzee may have attended. The current experiments tested this chimpanzee and adult humans using sine-wave and noise-vocoded speech manipulated using specific sine-waves and a different number of noise bands, respectively. Similar to humans tested with the same stimuli, the chimpanzee was more successful identifying sine-wave speech when both SW1 and SW2 were present - the components that are modeled on formants F1 and F2 in the natural speech signal. Results with noise-vocoded speech revealed that the chimpanzee and humans performed best with stimuli that included four or five noise bands, as compared to those with three and two. Overall, amplitude and frequency modulation over time were important for identification of sine-wave and noise-vocoded speech, with further evidence that a nonhuman primate is capable of using top-down processes for speech perception when the signal is altered and incomplete.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic cues; Chimpanzee; Speech perception

Year:  2021        PMID: 33555417     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-021-01478-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  26 in total

1.  Speech perception by the chinchilla: voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants.

Authors:  P K Kuhl; J D Miller
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-10-03       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences.

Authors:  Matthew H Davis; Ingrid S Johnsrude; Alexis Hervais-Adelman; Karen Taylor; Carolyn McGettigan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-05

3.  A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later.

Authors:  D D Greenwood
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A chimpanzee recognizes synthetic speech with significantly reduced acoustic cues to phonetic content.

Authors:  Lisa A Heimbauer; Michael J Beran; Michael J Owren
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Perception of sinewave vowels.

Authors:  James M Hillenbrand; Michael J Clark; Carter A Baer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Japanese quail can learn phonetic categories.

Authors:  K R Kluender; R L Diehl; P R Killeen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-09-04       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Sequential responding and planning in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Michael J Beran; James L Pate; David A Washburn; Duane M Rumbaugh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2004-07

8.  Chimpanzee responding during matching to sample: control by exclusion.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; David A Washburn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 9.  Hearing speech sounds: top-down influences on the interface between audition and speech perception.

Authors:  Matthew H Davis; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  A longitudinal assessment of vocabulary retention in symbol-competent chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Lisa A Heimbauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.