Literature DB >> 21722576

Implant healing in experimental animal models of diabetes.

Nga N Le1, Michael B Rose, Howard Levinson, Bruce Klitzman.   

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is becoming increasingly prevalent worldwide. Additionally, there is an increasing number of patients receiving implantable devices such as glucose sensors and orthopedic implants. Thus, it is likely that the number of diabetic patients receiving these devices will also increase. Even though implantable medical devices are considered biocompatible by the Food and Drug Administration, the adverse tissue healing that occurs adjacent to these foreign objects is a leading cause of their failure. This foreign body response leads to fibrosis, encapsulation of the device, and a reduction or cessation of device performance. A second adverse event is microbial infection of implanted devices, which can lead to persistent local and systemic infections and also exacerbates the fibrotic response. Nearly half of all nosocomial infections are associated with the presence of an indwelling medical device. Events associated with both the foreign body response and implant infection can necessitate device removal and may lead to amputation, which is associated with significant morbidity and cost. Diabetes mellitus is generally indicated as a risk factor for the infection of a variety of implants such as prosthetic joints, pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, penile implants, and urinary catheters. Implant infection rates in diabetic patients vary depending upon the implant and the microorganism, however, for example, diabetes was found to be a significant variable associated with a nearly 7.2% infection rate for implantable cardioverter defibrillators by the microorganism Candida albicans. While research has elucidated many of the altered mechanisms of diabetic cutaneous wound healing, the internal healing adjacent to indwelling medical devices in a diabetic model has rarely been studied. Understanding this healing process is crucial to facilitating improved device design. The purpose of this article is to summarize the physiologic factors that influence wound healing and infection in diabetic patients, to review research concerning diabetes and biomedical implants and device infection, and to critically analyze which diabetic animal model might be advantageous for assessing internal healing adjacent to implanted devices.
© 2011 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21722576      PMCID: PMC3192627          DOI: 10.1177/193229681100500315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  63 in total

Review 1.  Chemokines and diabetic wound healing.

Authors:  Oscar Ochoa; Francis M Torres; Paula K Shireman
Journal:  Vascular       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.285

Review 2.  Animal models of human type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Matthias von Herrath; Gerald T Nepom
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 25.606

Review 3.  Cellular and molecular basis of wound healing in diabetes.

Authors:  Harold Brem; Marjana Tomic-Canic
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Diabetes-induced alteration of F4/80+ macrophages: a study in mice with streptozotocin-induced diabetes for a long term.

Authors:  Haixia Ma; Guangwei Liu; Wenjun Ding; You Wu; Lu Cai; Yong Zhao
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Decreased macrophage number and activation lead to reduced lymphatic vessel formation and contribute to impaired diabetic wound healing.

Authors:  Kazuichi Maruyama; Jun Asai; Masaaki Ii; Tina Thorne; Douglas W Losordo; Patricia A D'Amore
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Diabetes associated with increased surgical site infections in spinal arthrodesis.

Authors:  Sam Chen; Matt V Anderson; Wayne K Cheng; Montri D Wongworawat
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Defects in innate immunity predispose C57BL/6J-Leprdb/Leprdb mice to infection by Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Sunny Park; Jeremy Rich; Frank Hanses; Jean C Lee
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Simvastatin enhances VEGF production and ameliorates impaired wound healing in experimental diabetes.

Authors:  Alessandra Bitto; Letteria Minutoli; Domenica Altavilla; Francesca Polito; Tiziana Fiumara; Herbert Marini; Mariarosaria Galeano; Margherita Calò; Patrizia Lo Cascio; Michele Bonaiuto; Alba Migliorato; Achille P Caputi; Francesco Squadrito
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 7.658

9.  Molecular basis for affected cartilage formation and bone union in fracture healing of the streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat.

Authors:  Akira Ogasawara; Arata Nakajima; Fumitake Nakajima; Ken-Ichiro Goto; Masashi Yamazaki
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 10.  Models for diabetic wound healing and healing into percutaneous devices.

Authors:  John E Olerud
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.517

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Local delivery of nitric oxide: targeted delivery of therapeutics to bone and connective tissues.

Authors:  Scott P Nichols; Wesley L Storm; Ahyeon Koh; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 15.470

2.  Characterization of porous, dexamethasone-releasing polyurethane coatings for glucose sensors.

Authors:  Suzana G Vallejo-Heligon; Bruce Klitzman; William M Reichert
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  Preclinical Performance Evaluation of Percutaneous Glucose Biosensors: Experimental Considerations and Recommendations.

Authors:  Robert J Soto; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-17

4.  Interstitial fluid physiology as it relates to glucose monitoring technologies: symposium introduction.

Authors:  Natalie A Wisniewski; Uli Klueh; Julie Stenken
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-01

Review 5.  Biocompatible materials for continuous glucose monitoring devices.

Authors:  Scott P Nichols; Ahyeon Koh; Wesley L Storm; Jae Ho Shin; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  Influence of diabetes on the foreign body response to nitric oxide-releasing implants.

Authors:  Robert J Soto; Elizabeth P Merricks; Dwight A Bellinger; Timothy C Nichols; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Electrical Stimulation of Eye Blink in Individuals with Acute Facial Palsy: Progress toward a Bionic Blink.

Authors:  Alice Frigerio; James T Heaton; Paolo Cavallari; Chris Knox; Marc H Hohman; Tessa A Hadlock
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 8.  Modulating the foreign body response of implants for diabetes treatment.

Authors:  Bhushan N Kharbikar; Gauree S Chendke; Tejal A Desai
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 17.873

9.  Characterization of vaginal immune response to a polypropylene mesh: Diabetic vs. normoglycemic conditions.

Authors:  Rui Liang; Abigail Fisk; Gabrielle King; Leslie Meyn; Xiangwei Xiao; Pamela Moalli
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 10.633

10.  Diabetic mouse model of orthopaedic implant-related Staphylococcus aureus infection.

Authors:  Arianna B Lovati; Lorenzo Drago; Lorenzo Monti; Elena De Vecchi; Sara Previdi; Giuseppe Banfi; Carlo L Romanò
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.