Literature DB >> 21721613

Optimal use of data in parallel tempering simulations for the construction of discrete-state Markov models of biomolecular dynamics.

Jan-Hendrik Prinz1, John D Chodera, Vijay S Pande, William C Swope, Jeremy C Smith, Frank Noé.   

Abstract

Parallel tempering (PT) molecular dynamics simulations have been extensively investigated as a means of efficient sampling of the configurations of biomolecular systems. Recent work has demonstrated how the short physical trajectories generated in PT simulations of biomolecules can be used to construct the Markov models describing biomolecular dynamics at each simulated temperature. While this approach describes the temperature-dependent kinetics, it does not make optimal use of all available PT data, instead estimating the rates at a given temperature using only data from that temperature. This can be problematic, as some relevant transitions or states may not be sufficiently sampled at the temperature of interest, but might be readily sampled at nearby temperatures. Further, the comparison of temperature-dependent properties can suffer from the false assumption that data collected from different temperatures are uncorrelated. We propose here a strategy in which, by a simple modification of the PT protocol, the harvested trajectories can be reweighted, permitting data from all temperatures to contribute to the estimated kinetic model. The method reduces the statistical uncertainty in the kinetic model relative to the single temperature approach and provides estimates of transition probabilities even for transitions not observed at the temperature of interest. Further, the method allows the kinetics to be estimated at temperatures other than those at which simulations were run. We illustrate this method by applying it to the generation of a Markov model of the conformational dynamics of the solvated terminally blocked alanine peptide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21721613      PMCID: PMC3139503          DOI: 10.1063/1.3592153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  26 in total

Review 1.  Single-molecule folding.

Authors:  Xiaowei Zhuang; Matthias Rief
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.809

2.  A microscopic view of miniprotein folding: enhanced folding efficiency through formation of an intermediate.

Authors:  Hannes Neuweiler; Sören Doose; Markus Sauer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A protein folding pathway with multiple folding intermediates at atomic resolution.

Authors:  Hanqiao Feng; Zheng Zhou; Yawen Bai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-25       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Temperature weighted histogram analysis method, replica exchange, and transition paths.

Authors:  Emilio Gallicchio; Michael Andrec; Anthony K Felts; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  Coarse master equations for peptide folding dynamics.

Authors:  Nicolae-Viorel Buchete; Gerhard Hummer
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  ETNA: equilibrium transitions network and Arrhenius equation for extracting folding kinetics from REMD simulations.

Authors:  S Muff; A Caflisch
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Probability distributions of molecular observables computed from Markov models.

Authors:  Frank Noé
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 8.  Parallel tempering: theory, applications, and new perspectives.

Authors:  David J Earl; Michael W Deem
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 3.676

9.  Dynamical reweighting: improved estimates of dynamical properties from simulations at multiple temperatures.

Authors:  John D Chodera; William C Swope; Frank Noé; Jan-Hendrik Prinz; Michael R Shirts; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Enhanced modeling via network theory: Adaptive sampling of Markov state models.

Authors:  Gregory R Bowman; Daniel L Ensign; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  14 in total

1.  Dynamical reweighting: improved estimates of dynamical properties from simulations at multiple temperatures.

Authors:  John D Chodera; William C Swope; Frank Noé; Jan-Hendrik Prinz; Michael R Shirts; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  A comparison of weighted ensemble and Markov state model methodologies.

Authors:  Haoyun Feng; Ronan Costaouec; Eric Darve; Jesús A Izaguirre
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  A derivation of the master equation from path entropy maximization.

Authors:  Julian Lee; Steve Pressé
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Using Markov state models to study self-assembly.

Authors:  Matthew R Perkett; Michael F Hagan
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Multiensemble Markov models of molecular thermodynamics and kinetics.

Authors:  Hao Wu; Fabian Paul; Christoph Wehmeyer; Frank Noé
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Computational membrane biophysics: From ion channel interactions with drugs to cellular function.

Authors:  Williams E Miranda; Van A Ngo; Laura L Perissinotti; Sergei Yu Noskov
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 3.036

7.  Pathways for virus assembly around nucleic acids.

Authors:  Jason D Perlmutter; Matthew R Perkett; Michael F Hagan
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Microsecond folding experiments and simulations: a match is made.

Authors:  M B Prigozhin; M Gruebele
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.676

Review 9.  Markov state models of biomolecular conformational dynamics.

Authors:  John D Chodera; Frank Noé
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 6.809

10.  Discrete kinetic models from funneled energy landscape simulations.

Authors:  Nicholas P Schafer; Ryan M B Hoffman; Anat Burger; Patricio O Craig; Elizabeth A Komives; Peter G Wolynes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.