Literature DB >> 27844231

A new method to precisely control the depth of percutaneous screws into the pedicle by counting the rotation number of the screw with low radiation exposure: technical note.

Xu Li1, Feng Zhang1, Wenzhi Zhang2, Xifu Shang1, Jintao Han3, Pengfei Liu1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Technique note.
OBJECTIVES: To report a new method for precisely controlling the depth of percutaneous pedicle screws (PPS)-without radiation exposure to surgeons and less fluoroscopy exposure to patients than with conventional methods. PPS is widely used in minimal invasive spine surgery; the advantages include reduced muscle damage, pain, and hospital stays. However, placement of PPS demands repeated checking with fluoroscopy. Thus, radiation exposure is considerable for both surgeons and patients.
METHODS: The PPS depth was determined by counting rotations of the screws. The distance between screw threads can be measured for particular screws; thus, full rotations of the PPS results in the screw advancing in the pedicle the distance between screw threads. To fully insert screws into the pedicle, the number of full rotations is equal to the number of threads in the PPS.
RESULTS: We applied this technique in 58 patients with thoracolumbar fracture. The position and depth of the screws was checked during the operation with the C-arm and after operation by anteroposterior X-ray film or computed tomography. No additional procedures were required to correct the screws; we observed no neurological deficits or malpositioning of the screws. In the screw placement procedure, the radiation exposure for surgeons is zero, and the patient is well protected from extensive radiation exposure.
CONCLUSIONS: This method of counting rotation of screws is a safe way to precisely determine the depth of PPS in the placement procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Depth of the screws; Percutaneous pedicle screws (PPS); Radiation exposure; Radiation protection

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27844231     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4870-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  10 in total

1.  CT accuracy of percutaneous versus open pedicle screw techniques: a series of 1609 screws.

Authors:  Todd M Chapman; Daniel J Blizzard; Christopher R Brown
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A comparison of feasibility and safety of percutaneous fluoroscopic guided thoracic pedicle screws between Europeans and Asians: is there any difference?

Authors:  Mun Keong Kwan; Chee Kidd Chiu; Chris Yin Wei Chan; Reza Zamani; Nils Hansen-Algenstaedt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Surgical site infection rates after minimally invasive spinal surgery.

Authors:  John E O'Toole; Kurt M Eichholz; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2009-10

4.  Factors affecting the accurate placement of percutaneous pedicle screws during minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Moon-Chan Kim; Hung-Tae Chung; Jae-Lim Cho; Dong-Jun Kim; Nam-Su Chung
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Anterior interbody arthrodesis with percutaneous posterior pedicle fixation for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  D Greg Anderson; Amirali Sayadipour; Kevin Shelby; Todd J Albert; Alexander R Vaccaro; Michael S Weinstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Percutaneous pedicle screw placements: accuracy and rates of cranial facet joint violation using conventional fluoroscopy compared with intraoperative three-dimensional computed tomography computer navigation.

Authors:  Tetsuro Ohba; Shigeto Ebata; Koji Fujita; Hironao Sato; Hirotaka Haro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Dong-Yun Kim; Sang-Ho Lee; Sang Ki Chung; Ho-Yeon Lee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Comparison between percutaneous and traditional fixation of lumbar spine fracture: intraoperative radiation exposure levels and outcomes.

Authors:  N Bronsard; T Boli; M Challali; R de Dompsure; N Amoretti; B Padovani; G Bruneton; A Fuchs; F de Peretti
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.256

9.  Patient exposure and associated radiation risks from fluoroscopically guided vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Kostas Perisinakis; John Damilakis; Nicholas Theocharopoulos; George Papadokostakis; Alexandros Hadjipavlou; Nicholas Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  The surgeon's real dose exposure during balloon kyphoplasty procedure and evaluation of the cement delivery system: a prospective study.

Authors:  Frédéric Schils; Werner Schoojans; Lara Struelens
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 3.134

  10 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2017.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Percutaneous endoscopic unilateral laminotomy and bilateral decompression under 3D real-time image-guided navigation for spinal stenosis in degenerative lumbar kyphoscoliosis patients: an innovative preliminary study.

Authors:  Tsung-Yu Ho; Chung-Wei Lin; Chien-Chun Chang; Hsien-Te Chen; Yen-Jen Chen; Yuan-Shun Lo; Pan-Hsuan Hsiao; Po-Chen Chen; Chih-Sheng Lin; Hsi-Kai Tsou
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.362

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.