Literature DB >> 21717247

The potential impact of the National Osteoporosis Foundation guidance on treatment eligibility in the USA: an update in NHANES 2005-2008.

B Dawson-Hughes1, A C Looker, A N A Tosteson, H Johansson, J A Kanis, L J Melton.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2008 data describes the prevalence of risk factors for osteoporosis and the proportions of men and postmenopausal women age 50 years and older who are candidates for treatment to lower fracture risk, according to the new Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX)-based National Osteoporosis Foundation Clinician's Guide.
INTRODUCTION: It is important to update estimates of the proportions of the older US population considered eligible for pharmacologic treatment for osteoporosis for purposes of understanding the health care burden of this disease.
METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of the NHANES 2005-2008 data in 3,608 men and women aged 50 years and older. Variables in the analysis included race/ethnicity, age, lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral density, risk factor profiles, and FRAX 10-year fracture probabilities.
RESULTS: The prevalence of osteoporosis of the femoral neck ranged from 6.0% in non-Hispanic black to 12.6% in Mexican American women. Spinal osteoporosis was more prevalent among Mexican American women (24.4%) than among either non-Hispanic blacks (5.3%) or non-Hispanic whites (10.9%). Treatment eligibility was similar in Mexican American and non-Hispanic white women (32.0% and 32.8%) and higher than it was in non-Hispanic black women (11.0%). Treatment eligibility among men was 21.1% in non-Hispanic whites, 12.6% in Mexican Americans, and 3.0% in non-Hispanic blacks.
CONCLUSIONS: Nineteen percent of older men and 30% of older women in the USA are at sufficient risk for fracture to warrant consideration for pharmacotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21717247     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1694-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  17 in total

1.  Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025.

Authors:  Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 2.  Issues in design, measurement, and analysis for menopause research.

Authors:  S M McKinlay
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  1994 May-Aug       Impact factor: 4.032

3.  The diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; L J Melton; C Christiansen; C C Johnston; N Khaltaev
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Population trends in BMD testing, treatment, and hip and wrist fracture rates: are the hip fracture projections wrong?

Authors:  Susan B Jaglal; Iris Weller; Muhammad Mamdani; Gillian Hawker; Hans Kreder; Liisa Jaakkimainen; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-12-20       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Estimating bisphosphonate use and fracture reduction among US women aged 45 years and older, 2001-2008.

Authors:  Ethel S Siris; Margaret K Pasquale; Yiting Wang; Nelson B Watts
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Application of the National Osteoporosis Foundation Guidelines to postmenopausal women and men: the Framingham Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  S D Berry; D P Kiel; M G Donaldson; S R Cummings; J A Kanis; H Johansson; E J Samelson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Estimates of the proportion of older white women who would be recommended for pharmacologic treatment by the new U.S. National Osteoporosis Foundation Guidelines.

Authors:  Meghan G Donaldson; Peggy M Cawthon; Li-Yung Lui; John T Schousboe; Kristine E Ensrud; Brent C Taylor; Jane A Cauley; Teresa A Hillier; Dennis M Black; Doug C Bauer; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Increasing hip fracture incidence in California Hispanics, 1983 to 2000.

Authors:  David S Zingmond; L Joseph Melton; Stuart L Silverman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-03-04       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  The potential impact of new National Osteoporosis Foundation guidance on treatment patterns.

Authors:  B Dawson-Hughes; A C Looker; A N A Tosteson; H Johansson; J A Kanis; L J Melton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Race/ethnic differences in bone mineral density in men.

Authors:  A B Araujo; T G Travison; S S Harris; M F Holick; A K Turner; J B McKinlay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 5.071

View more
  40 in total

1.  Reference values of bone mineral density and prevalence of osteoporosis in Chinese adults.

Authors:  Z-Q Zhang; S C Ho; Z-Q Chen; C-X Zhang; Y-M Chen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  unveiling skeletal fragility in patients diagnosed with MGUS: no longer a condition of undetermined significance?

Authors:  Matthew T Drake
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Clinical Factors, Disease Parameters, and Molecular Therapies Affecting Osseointegration of Orthopedic Implants.

Authors:  Hilal Maradit Kremers; Eric A Lewallen; Andre J van Wijnen; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Curr Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2016-06-29

4.  The assessment of bone mineral content and density of the lumbar spine and proximal femur in US submariners.

Authors:  H G Gasier; L M Hughes; C R Young; A M Richardson; A R Richardson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Serum urate levels and the risk of hip fractures: data from the Cardiovascular Health Study.

Authors:  Tapan Mehta; Petra Bůžková; Mark J Sarnak; Michel Chonchol; Jane A Cauley; Erin Wallace; Howard A Fink; John Robbins; Diana Jalal
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 8.694

6.  The impact of the new National Bone Health Alliance (NBHA) diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of osteoporosis in the USA.

Authors:  N C Wright; K G Saag; B Dawson-Hughes; S Khosla; E S Siris
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Development and validation of osteoporosis risk-assessment model for Korean postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Sun Min Oh; Byung-Ho Nam; Yumie Rhee; Seong-Hwan Moon; Deog Young Kim; Dae Ryong Kang; Hyeon Chang Kim
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Prevalence of renal impairment among osteoporotic women in the USA, NHANES 2005-2008: is treatment with bisphosphonates an option?

Authors:  R Lubwama; A Nguyen; A Modi; D Chirovsky; C Diana; P D Miller
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Breast cancer and osteoporosis - management of cancer treatment-induced bone loss in postmenopausal women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Matthias Kalder; Peyman Hadji
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Guidance for the diagnosis, prevention and therapy of osteoporosis in Italy.

Authors:  Luisella Cianferotti; Maria Luisa Brandi
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2012-12-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.