Literature DB >> 19049330

Estimates of the proportion of older white women who would be recommended for pharmacologic treatment by the new U.S. National Osteoporosis Foundation Guidelines.

Meghan G Donaldson1, Peggy M Cawthon, Li-Yung Lui, John T Schousboe, Kristine E Ensrud, Brent C Taylor, Jane A Cauley, Teresa A Hillier, Dennis M Black, Doug C Bauer, Steven R Cummings.   

Abstract

The new U.S. National Osteoporosis Foundation Clinician's Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis includes criteria for recommending pharmacologic treatment based on history of hip or vertebral fracture, femoral neck (FN), or spine BMD T-scores <or=-2.5 and presence of low bone mass at the FN or spine plus a 10-yr risk of hip fracture >or=3% or of major osteoporotic fracture >or=20%. The proportion of women who would be recommended for treatment by these guidelines is not known. We applied the NOF criteria for treatment to women participating in the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF). To determine how the SOF population differs from the general U.S. population of white women >or=65 yr of age, we compared women in SOF with women who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III on criteria included in the NOF treatment guidelines that were common to both cohorts. Compared with NHANES III, women in SOF had higher FN BMD and were younger. Application of NOF guidelines to SOF data estimated that at least 72% of U.S. white women >or=65 yr of age and 93% of those >or=75 yr of age would be recommended for drug treatment. Application of the new NOF Guidelines would result in recommending a very large proportion of white women in the United States for pharmacologic treatment of osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19049330      PMCID: PMC2659514          DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.081203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  15 in total

1.  Clodronate reduces the incidence of fractures in community-dwelling elderly women unselected for osteoporosis: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized study.

Authors:  Eugene V McCloskey; Monique Beneton; Diane Charlesworth; Karthik Kayan; Dominic deTakats; Abhijit Dey; Jane Orgee; Robert Ashford; Martin Forster; Jennifer Cliffe; Linda Kersh; John Brazier; Jon Nichol; Sakari Aropuu; Tarja Jalava; John A Kanis
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Effect of risedronate on the risk of hip fracture in elderly women. Hip Intervention Program Study Group.

Authors:  M R McClung; P Geusens; P D Miller; H Zippel; W G Bensen; C Roux; S Adami; I Fogelman; T Diamond; R Eastell; P J Meunier; J Y Reginster
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Effects of estrogen plus progestin on risk of fracture and bone mineral density: the Women's Health Initiative randomized trial.

Authors:  Jane A Cauley; John Robbins; Zhao Chen; Steven R Cummings; Rebecca D Jackson; Andrea Z LaCroix; Meryl LeBoff; Cora E Lewis; Joan McGowan; Joan Neuner; Mary Pettinger; Marcia L Stefanick; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Nelson B Watts
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Implications of absolute fracture risk assessment for osteoporosis practice guidelines in the USA.

Authors:  B Dawson-Hughes; A N A Tosteson; L J Melton; S Baim; M J Favus; S Khosla; R L Lindsay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; H Johansson; E McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  BMD at multiple sites and risk of fracture of multiple types: long-term results from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures.

Authors:  Katie L Stone; Dana G Seeley; Li-Yung Lui; Jane A Cauley; Kristine Ensrud; Warren S Browner; Michael C Nevitt; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures.

Authors:  Ethel S Siris; Ya-Ting Chen; Thomas A Abbott; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Paul D Miller; Lois E Wehren; Marc L Berger
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-05-24

8.  Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of treatments to prevent fractures in men and women with low bone density or osteoporosis.

Authors:  Catherine MacLean; Sydne Newberry; Margaret Maglione; Maureen McMahon; Veena Ranganath; Marika Suttorp; Walter Mojica; Martha Timmer; Alicia Alexander; Melissa McNamara; Sheetal B Desai; Annie Zhou; Susan Chen; Jason Carter; Carlo Tringale; Di Valentine; Breanne Johnsen; Jennifer Grossman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Age and bone mass as predictors of fracture in a prospective study.

Authors:  S L Hui; C W Slemenda; C C Johnston
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 10.  Alendronate for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  G A Wells; A Cranney; J Peterson; M Boucher; B Shea; V Robinson; D Coyle; P Tugwell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23
View more
  36 in total

1.  Obesity is not protective against fracture in postmenopausal women: GLOW.

Authors:  Juliet E Compston; Nelson B Watts; Roland Chapurlat; Cyrus Cooper; Steven Boonen; Susan Greenspan; Johannes Pfeilschifter; Stuart Silverman; Adolfo Díez-Pérez; Robert Lindsay; Kenneth G Saag; J Coen Netelenbos; Stephen Gehlbach; Frederick H Hooven; Julie Flahive; Jonathan D Adachi; Maurizio Rossini; Andrea Z Lacroix; Christian Roux; Philip N Sambrook; Ethel S Siris
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Fracture-risk calculators: Has their time come?

Authors:  Mark J Bolland
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  Sanford Baim; William D Leslie
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Evaluation of bone mineral density loss in morbidly obese women after gastric bypass: 3-year follow-up.

Authors:  Nuria Vilarrasa; Patricia San José; Isabel García; Carmen Gómez-Vaquero; Pilar Medina Miras; Amador G Ruiz de Gordejuela; Carles Masdevall; Jordi Pujol; Joan Soler; José Manuel Gómez
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Assessment of the 10-year risk of fracture in Italian postmenopausal women using FRAX®: a north Italian multicenter study.

Authors:  M Pedrazzoni; G Girasole; A Giusti; A Barone; G Pioli; G Passeri; E Palummeri; G Bianchi
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Conflicts at the heart of the FRAX tool.

Authors:  Teppo L N Järvinen; Jarkko Jokihaara; Pierre Guy; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Gary S Collins; Karl Michaëlsson; Harri Sievänen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Addressing the ethical, policy, and social challenges of preclinical Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Jason Karlawish
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Should there be a fracas over FRAX and other fracture prediction tools?: Comment on "A comparison of prediction models for fractures in older women".

Authors:  Cathleen S Colón-Emeric; Kenneth W Lyles
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-14

9.  A comparison of prediction models for fractures in older women: is more better?

Authors:  Kristine E Ensrud; Li-Yung Lui; Brent C Taylor; John T Schousboe; Meghan G Donaldson; Howard A Fink; Jane A Cauley; Teresa A Hillier; Warren S Browner; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-14

10.  Assessment of individual fracture risk: FRAX and beyond.

Authors:  Joop P W van den Bergh; Tineke A C M van Geel; Willem F Lems; Piet P Geusens
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.