Literature DB >> 25319751

unveiling skeletal fragility in patients diagnosed with MGUS: no longer a condition of undetermined significance?

Matthew T Drake1.   

Abstract

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is a common finding in clinical practice, affecting greater than 3% of adults aged 50 years and older. As originally described, the term MGUS reflected the inherent clinical uncertainty of distinguishing patients with a benign stable monoclonal plasma cell disorder from subjects destined to progress to malignancy. There is now clear epidemiologic evidence, however, that patients with MGUS suffer from a significantly increased fracture risk and that the prevalence of MGUS is increased in patients with osteoporosis. Despite this relationship, no clinical care guidelines exist for the routine evaluation or treatment of the skeletal health of patients with MGUS. Recent work has demonstrated that circulating levels of at least two cytokines (CCL3/MIP-1α and DKK1) with well-recognized roles in bone disease in the related monoclonal gammopathy multiple myeloma are also increased in patients with MGUS. Further, recent imaging studies using high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT have documented that patients with MGUS have substantial skeletal microarchitectural deterioration and deficits in biomechanical bone strength that likely underlie the increased skeletal fragility in these patients. Accordingly, this Perspective provides evidence that the "undetermined significance" portion of the MGUS acronym may be best replaced in favor of the term "monoclonal gammopathy of skeletal significance" (MGSS) in order to more accurately reflect the enhanced skeletal risks inherent in this condition.
© 2014 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DXA; FRACTURE; HRPQCT; MGUS; OSTEOPOROSIS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25319751      PMCID: PMC4268401          DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  65 in total

1.  Increased expression of macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha on trephine biopsies correlates with extensive bone disease, increased angiogenesis and advanced stage in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  M Roussou; A Tasidou; M A Dimopoulos; E Kastritis; M Migkou; D Christoulas; M Gavriatopoulou; F Zagouri; C Matsouka; D Anagnostou; E Terpos
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025.

Authors:  Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Utility of testing for monoclonal bands in serum of patients with suspected osteoporosis: retrospective, cross sectional study.

Authors:  Bo Abrahamsen; Ivan Andersen; Susanne S Christensen; Jonna Skov Madsen; Kim Brixen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-03-14

Review 4.  Mayo clinic consensus statement for the use of bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Martha Q Lacy; Angela Dispenzieri; Morie A Gertz; Philip R Greipp; Kimberly L Gollbach; Suzanne R Hayman; Shaji Kumar; John A Lust; S Vincent Rajkumar; Stephen J Russell; Thomas E Witzig; Steven R Zeldenrust; David Dingli; P Lief Bergsagel; Rafael Fonseca; Craig B Reeder; A Keith Stewart; Vivek Roy; Robert J Dalton; Alan B Carr; Deepak Kademani; Eugene E Keller; Christopher F Viozzi; Robert A Kyle
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  Phenotypic and functional characterization of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells derived from patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  B Arnulf; S Lecourt; J Soulier; B Ternaux; M-Noelle Lacassagne; A Crinquette; J Dessoly; A-K Sciaini; M Benbunan; C Chomienne; J-P Fermand; J-P Marolleau; J Larghero
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 11.528

6.  Bone remodelling in monoclonal gammopathies of uncertain significance, symptomatic and nonsymptomatic myeloma.

Authors:  M Laroche; M Attal; C Dromer
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.998

8.  American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 clinical practice guideline update on the role of bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Robert A Kyle; Gary C Yee; Mark R Somerfield; Patrick J Flynn; Susan Halabi; Sundar Jagannath; Robert Z Orlowski; David G Roodman; Patricia Twilde; Kenneth Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Quantifiable excess of bone resorption in monoclonal gammopathy is an early symptom of malignancy: a prospective study of 87 bone biopsies.

Authors:  R Bataille; D Chappard; M F Basle
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 10.  A systematic review of hip fracture incidence and probability of fracture worldwide.

Authors:  J A Kanis; A Odén; E V McCloskey; H Johansson; D A Wahl; C Cooper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Dynamic interplay between bone and multiple myeloma: emerging roles of the osteoblast.

Authors:  Michaela R Reagan; Lucy Liaw; Clifford J Rosen; Irene M Ghobrial
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Use of trabecular bone score for risk stratification of patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.

Authors:  Jad G Sfeir; Tito D Pena Guzman; Lucia Bedatsova; Stephen M Broski; Matthew T Drake
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  MGUS to myeloma: a mysterious gammopathy of underexplored significance.

Authors:  Madhav V Dhodapkar
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 4.  Management of endocrine disease: Secondary osteoporosis: pathophysiology and management.

Authors:  Faryal Mirza; Ernesto Canalis
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 6.664

Review 5.  Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and bone health outcomes: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicola Veronese; Claudio Luchini; Marco Solmi; Giuseppe Sergi; Enzo Manzato; Brendon Stubbs
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 6.  Traditional and Non-traditional Risk Factors for Osteoporosis in CKD.

Authors:  Hanne Skou Jørgensen; Karel David; Syazrah Salam; Pieter Evenepoel
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 7.  The skeletal impact of cancer therapies.

Authors:  Lucia Bedatsova; Matthew T Drake
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 8.  Adipose, Bone, and Myeloma: Contributions from the Microenvironment.

Authors:  Michelle M McDonald; Heather Fairfield; Carolyne Falank; Michaela R Reagan
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 9.  Multiple myeloma in the marrow: pathogenesis and treatments.

Authors:  Heather Fairfield; Carolyne Falank; Lindsey Avery; Michaela R Reagan
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Bone tissue quality in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance.

Authors:  Guillermina Orduna; Leonardo Mellibovsky; Eugenia Abella; Xavier Nogués; Roser Granero; Natalia García-Giralt; Marta Pineda-Moncusí; Roberto Güerri-Fernández; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra; Adolfo Díez-Pérez
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.