Literature DB >> 21715640

The neural underpinnings of how reward associations can both guide and misguide attention.

Ruth M Krebs1, Carsten N Boehler, Tobias Egner, Marty G Woldorff.   

Abstract

It is commonly accepted that reward is an effective motivator of behavior, but little is known about potential costs resulting from reward associations. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the neural underpinnings of such reward-related performance-disrupting effects in a reward-modulated Stroop task in humans. While reward associations in the task-relevant dimension (i.e., ink color) facilitated performance, behavioral detriments were found when the task-irrelevant dimension (i.e., word meaning) implicitly referred to reward-predictive ink colors. Neurally, only relevant reward associations invoked a typical reward-anticipation response in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc), which was in turn predictive of behavioral facilitation. In contrast, irrelevant reward associations increased activity in a medial prefrontal motor-control-related region, namely the presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA), which likely reflects the preemption and inhibition of automatic response tendencies that are amplified by irrelevant reward-related words. This view was further supported by a positive relationship between pre-SMA activity and pronounced response slowing in trials containing reward-related as compared with reward-unrelated incongruent words. Importantly, the distinct neural processes related to the beneficial and detrimental behavioral effects of reward associations appeared to arise from preferential-coding mechanisms in visual-processing areas that were shared by the two stimulus dimensions, suggesting a transfer of reward-related saliency to the irrelevant dimension, but with highly differential behavioral and neural ramifications. More generally, the data demonstrate that even entirely irrelevant reward associations can influence stimulus-processing and response-selection pathways relatively automatically, thereby representing an important flipside of reward-driven performance enhancements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21715640      PMCID: PMC3142621          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0732-11.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  59 in total

1.  The relative involvement of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex in attentional control depends on nature of conflict.

Authors:  M P Milham; M T Banich; A Webb; V Barad; N J Cohen; T Wszalek; A F Kramer
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2001-12

2.  Anticipation of increasing monetary reward selectively recruits nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  B Knutson; C M Adams; G W Fong; D Hommer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Neural activity in early visual cortex reflects behavioral experience and higher-order perceptual saliency.

Authors:  Tai Sing Lee; Cindy F Yang; Richard D Romero; David Mumford
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  A midline dissociation between error-processing and response-conflict monitoring.

Authors:  H Garavan; T J Ross; J Kaufman; E A Stein
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Instructed delay activity in the human prefrontal cortex is modulated by monetary reward expectation.

Authors:  N Ramnani; R C Miall
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  How brains beware: neural mechanisms of emotional attention.

Authors:  Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Subprocesses of performance monitoring: a dissociation of error processing and response competition revealed by event-related fMRI and ERPs.

Authors:  M Ullsperger; D Y von Cramon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Motivation and cognitive control in the human prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Frédérique Kouneiher; Sylvain Charron; Etienne Koechlin
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-07       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Is avoiding an aversive outcome rewarding? Neural substrates of avoidance learning in the human brain.

Authors:  Hackjin Kim; Shinsuke Shimojo; John P O'Doherty
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Human medial frontal cortex mediates unconscious inhibition of voluntary action.

Authors:  Petroc Sumner; Parashkev Nachev; Peter Morris; Andrew M Peters; Stephen R Jackson; Christopher Kennard; Masud Husain
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  59 in total

1.  Trait self-control is predicted by how reward associations modulate Stroop interference.

Authors:  Max Wolff; Klaus-Martin Krönke; Thomas Goschke
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-09-24

2.  Reward breaks through center-surround inhibition via anterior insula.

Authors:  Lihui Wang; Hongbo Yu; Jie Hu; Jan Theeuwes; Xiaoliang Gong; Yang Xiang; Changjun Jiang; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Value-based attentional capture affects multi-alternative decision making.

Authors:  Sebastian Gluth; Mikhail S Spektor; Jörg Rieskamp
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  A key role for stimulus-specific updating of the sensory cortices in the learning of stimulus-reward associations.

Authors:  Berry van den Berg; Benjamin R Geib; Rene San Martín; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Mechanisms of habitual approach: Failure to suppress irrelevant responses evoked by previously reward-associated stimuli.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Charles L Folk; Rebecca Garrison; Leeland Rogers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-04-07

6.  Value-based attentional capture influences context-dependent decision-making.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Napat Rangsipat; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Reward-prospect interacts with trial-by-trial preparation for potential distraction.

Authors:  Francesco Marini; Berry van den Berg; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2015-02-01

8.  Neural mechanisms mediating contingent capture of attention by affective stimuli.

Authors:  Crystal Reeck; Kevin S LaBar; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 9.  A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Task-specific effects of reward on task switching.

Authors:  Akina Umemoto; Clay B Holroyd
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-07-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.