Literature DB >> 22360642

Neural mechanisms mediating contingent capture of attention by affective stimuli.

Crystal Reeck1, Kevin S LaBar, Tobias Egner.   

Abstract

Attention is attracted exogenously by physically salient stimuli, but this effect can be dampened by endogenous attention settings, a phenomenon called "contingent capture." Emotionally salient stimuli are also thought to exert a strong exogenous influence on attention, especially in anxious individuals, but whether and how top-down attention can ameliorate bottom-up capture by affective stimuli is currently unknown. Here, we paired a novel spatial cueing task with fMRI to investigate contingent capture as a function of the affective salience of bottom-up cues (face stimuli) and individual differences in trait anxiety. In the absence of top-down cues, exogenous stimuli validly cueing targets facilitated attention in low-anxious participants, regardless of affective salience. However, although high-anxious participants exhibited similar facilitation following neutral exogenous cues, this facilitation was completely absent following affectively negative exogenous cues. Critically, these effects were contingent on endogenous attentional settings, such that explicit top-down cues presented before the appearance of exogenous stimuli removed anxious individuals' sensitivity to affectively salient stimuli. fMRI analyses revealed a network of brain regions underlying this variability in affective contingent capture across individuals, including the fusiform face area (FFA), posterior ventrolateral frontal cortex, and SMA. Importantly, activation in the posterior ventrolateral frontal cortex and the SMA fully mediated the effects observed in FFA, demonstrating a critical role for these frontal regions in mediating attentional orienting and interference resolution processes when engaged by affectively salient stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22360642      PMCID: PMC3654100          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  54 in total

1.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.

Authors:  C L Folk; R W Remington; J C Johnston
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Perceptual selectivity for color and form.

Authors:  J Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-06

3.  Unified segmentation.

Authors:  John Ashburner; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Attentional capture by emotional stimuli is preserved in patients with amygdala lesions.

Authors:  Richard M Piech; Maureen McHugo; Stephen D Smith; Mildred S Dukic; Joost Van Der Meer; Bassel Abou-Khalil; Steven B Most; David H Zald
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation.

Authors:  S Yantis; J Jonides
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception.

Authors:  N Kanwisher; J McDermott; M M Chun
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.

Authors:  R M Baron; D A Kenny
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1986-12

8.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06

Review 9.  Spatial attention and neglect: parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events.

Authors:  M M Mesulam
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Trait version: structure and content re-examined.

Authors:  P J Bieling; M M Antony; R P Swinson
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug
View more
  9 in total

1.  Emotional task management: neural correlates of switching between affective and non-affective task-sets.

Authors:  Crystal Reeck; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence reveals the effects of trait anxiety on contingent attentional capture.

Authors:  Yi-Chun Tsai; Hsin-Jie Lu; Chi-Fu Chang; Wei-Kuang Liang; Neil G Muggleton; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 3.  Application of a cognitive neuroscience perspective of cognitive control to late-life anxiety.

Authors:  Sherry A Beaudreau; Anna MacKay-Brandt; Jeremy Reynolds
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2013-03-22

4.  Can we shield ourselves from task disturbance by emotion-laden stimulation?

Authors:  Susanne Augst; Thomas Kleinsorge; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.526

5.  The neural basis of intergroup threat effect on social attention.

Authors:  Yujie Chen; Yufang Zhao; Hongwen Song; Lili Guan; Xin Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Trait anxiety modulates fronto-limbic processing of emotional interference in borderline personality disorder.

Authors:  Jana Holtmann; Maike C Herbort; Torsten Wüstenberg; Joram Soch; Sylvia Richter; Henrik Walter; Stefan Roepke; Björn H Schott
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Does the amygdala response correlate with the personality trait 'harm avoidance' while evaluating emotional stimuli explicitly?

Authors:  Peter Van Schuerbeek; Chris Baeken; Robert Luypaert; Rudi De Raedt; Johan De Mey
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.759

8.  Decomposing Self-Control: Individual Differences in Goal Pursuit Despite Interfering Aversion, Temptation, and Distraction.

Authors:  Rosa Steimke; Christine Stelzel; Robert Gaschler; Marcus Rothkirch; Vera U Ludwig; Lena M Paschke; Ima Trempler; Norbert Kathmann; Thomas Goschke; Henrik Walter
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-04-18

9.  Human brain structure predicts individual differences in preconscious evaluation of facial dominance and trustworthiness.

Authors:  Spas Getov; Ryota Kanai; Bahador Bahrami; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.436

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.