Literature DB >> 30576533

A key role for stimulus-specific updating of the sensory cortices in the learning of stimulus-reward associations.

Berry van den Berg1,2,3, Benjamin R Geib1, Rene San Martín4, Marty G Woldorff1,5.   

Abstract

Successful adaptive behavior requires the learning of associations between stimulus-specific choices and rewarding outcomes. Most research on the mechanisms underlying such processes has focused on subcortical reward-processing regions, in conjunction with frontal circuits. Given the extensive stimulus-specific coding in the sensory cortices, we hypothesized they would play a key role in the learning of stimulus-specific reward associations. We recorded electrical brain activity (using electroencephalogram) during a learning-based decision-making gambling task where, on each trial, participants chose between a face and a house and then received feedback (gain or loss). Within each 20-trial set, either faces or houses were more likely to predict a gain. Results showed that early feedback processing (~200-1200 ms) was independent of the choice made. In contrast, later feedback processing (~1400-1800 ms) was stimulus-specific, reflected by decreased alpha power (reflecting increased cortical activity) over face-selective regions, for winning-vs-losing after a face choice but not after a house choice. Finally, as the reward association was learned in a set, there was an increasingly stronger attentional bias towards the more likely winning stimulus, reflected by increasing attentional orienting-related brain activity and increasing likelihood of choosing that stimulus. These results delineate the processes underlying the updating of stimulus-reward associations during feedback-guided learning, which then guide future attentional allocation and decision-making.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; FRN; P3; decision-making; oscillatory alpha; reward learning

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30576533      PMCID: PMC6374612          DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsy116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci        ISSN: 1749-5016            Impact factor:   3.436


  67 in total

1.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Category learning increases discriminability of relevant object dimensions in visual cortex.

Authors:  Jonathan R Folstein; Thomas J Palmeri; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Distinct basal ganglia circuits controlling behaviors guided by flexible and stable values.

Authors:  Hyoung F Kim; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  The involvement of the dopaminergic midbrain and cortico-striatal-thalamic circuits in the integration of reward prospect and attentional task demands.

Authors:  Ruth M Krebs; Carsten N Boehler; Kenneth C Roberts; Allen W Song; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 5.  Computational modelling of visual attention.

Authors:  L Itti; C Koch
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Cortical Brain Activity Reflecting Attentional Biasing Toward Reward-Predicting Cues Covaries with Economic Decision-Making Performance.

Authors:  René San Martín; Lawrence G Appelbaum; Scott A Huettel; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Prestimulus oscillatory activity in the alpha band predicts visual discrimination ability.

Authors:  Hanneke van Dijk; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen; Robert Oostenveld; Ole Jensen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The Role of Alpha-Band Brain Oscillations as a Sensory Suppression Mechanism during Selective Attention.

Authors:  John J Foxe; Adam C Snyder
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-07-05

9.  Timing and sequence of brain activity in top-down control of visual-spatial attention.

Authors:  Tineke Grent-'t-Jong; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Visual search performance is predicted by both prestimulus and poststimulus electrical brain activity.

Authors:  Berry van den Berg; Lawrence G Appelbaum; Kait Clark; Monicque M Lorist; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Dynamic modulation of neural feedback processing and attention during spatial probabilistic learning.

Authors:  Celina Pütz; Berry van den Berg; Monicque M Lorist
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-04-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.