| Literature DB >> 21714874 |
Fumihiko Toyoshima1, Tadayuki Oshima, Shigemi Nakajima, Jun Sakurai, Junji Tanaka, Toshihiko Tomita, Kazutoshi Hori, Takayuki Matsumoto, Hiroto Miwa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although familial clustering of functional dyspepsia (FD) has been reported, the role of genetics in the susceptibility to FD is still not well understood. In the present study, the association between serotonin transporter (SERT) gene (SLC6A4) polymorphism and FD was explored.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21714874 PMCID: PMC3142494 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-12-88
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Genet ISSN: 1471-2350 Impact factor: 2.103
Participant demographics and genotype distributions
| Controls (n = 646) | FD, total (n = 53) | EPS (n = 39)4 | PDS (n = 42)4 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years)1 | 45 (19-78) | 52 (21-82) | 0.002 | 50 (21-82) | 0.021 | 51 (21-82) | 0.015 |
| Sex (male%) | 50.5 | 49.1 | 0.887 | 41.0 | 0.323 | 52.4 | 0.874 |
| Smoking (%) | 32.7 | 28.3 | 0.647 | 23.1 | 0.289 | 31.0 | 1.000 |
| Drinking (%) | 29.6 | 32.1 | 0.755 | 30.8 | 0.858 | 33.3 | 0.604 |
| SS | 69.3 | 56.6 | 61.5 | 50.0 | |||
| SL | 26.9 | 37.7 | 30.8 | 42.9 | |||
| LL | 3.7 | 5.7 | 0.117 | 7.7 | 0.257 | 7.1 | 0.019 |
| | 0.173 | 0.889 | 0.405 | 0.746 |
1Data are shown as median (range).
2P vs. controls by Mann-Whitney U-test (for age) or Fisher's exact test (for other variables).
3P for deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE).
4Twenty eight subjects are simultaneously classified EPS and PDS phenotype.
FD, functional dyspepsia; EPS, epigastric pain syndrome; PDS, postprandial distress syndrome
Risk of dyspepsia according to 5-HTTLPR genotypes
| FD, total (n = 53) | EPS (n = 39)1 | PDS (n = 42)1 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | (95%CI) | OR | (95%CI) | OR | (95%CI) | ||||
| SS | 1 | reference | 1 | reference | 1 | reference | |||
| SL | 1.75 | (0.96-3.19) | 0.672 | 1.33 | (0.65-2.73) | 0.443 | *2.24 | (1.16-4.32) | 0.017 |
| LL | 2.12 | (0.59-7.59) | 0.250 | 2.50 | (0.69-9.10) | 0.164 | 3.02 | (0.83-11.06) | 0.094 |
| SS vs. SL+LL | 1.79 | (1.01-3.18) | 0.472 | 1.46 | (0.75-2.87) | 0.268 | *2.32 | (1.23-4.37) | 0.009 |
1Twenty eight subjects are simultaneously classified EPS and PDS phenotype.
FD, functional dyspepsia; EPS, epigastric pain syndrome; PDS, postprandial distress syndrome;
OR, sex- and age-adjusted odds ratio, vs. 646 controls, by a multiple logistic regression model; CI, confidence interval.
* Significant P < 0.05