| Literature DB >> 19794934 |
Tomomitsu Tahara1, Tomoyuki Shibata, Hiromi Yamashita, Ichiro Hirata, Tomiyasu Arisawa.
Abstract
Altered inflammatory immune responses have been shown to be associated with functional gastro intestinal disorder. We aimed to clarify the effect of functional promoter polymorphism of RANTES, which is a potent chemoattractant peptide for memory T lymphocytes and eosinophils, on the risk of functional dyspepsia in a Japanese population. RANTES promoter C-28G polymorphism was genotyped in 246 subjects including 134 FD patients according to Roma III criteria and 112 non-symptomatic healthy controls. Although frequency of RANTES promoter polymorphisms in overall dyspeptic patients and non-symptomatic healthy controls did not show any significant differences, a significant association was found between G carrier and reduced risk of PDS according to Roma III criteria (age, sex, H. pylori infection adjusted OR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.06-0.80). We also found that the same genotype held a lower risk of PDS in H. pylori positive PDS subjects (age, sex adjusted OR = 0.11, 95% CI = 0.01-0.94). Our data suggest that RANTES promoter -28G carriers is associate with a reduced risk of PDS especially in H. pylori positive subjects.Entities:
Keywords: RANTES; Rome III; dyspepsia; polymorphism
Year: 2009 PMID: 19794934 PMCID: PMC2735638 DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.09-31
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Biochem Nutr ISSN: 0912-0009 Impact factor: 3.114
Characteristics of subjects
| FD ( | Control ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (mean SD) | 60.1 ± 12.8 | 59.0 ± 13.9 |
| Sex (male/female)# | 59/75 | 69/43 |
| 53.7 | 58.9 |
#; FD vs Control, p = 0.007 (two-sided Fisher’s exact test)
RANTES promoter polymorphism and risk of FD
| Variables; | genotype/n(%) | OR (95%CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC | CG | GG | Gcarrier vs CC | |
| Control (112) | 84 (75.0) | 24 (21.4) | 4 (3.6) | Reference |
| Over all FD (134) | 103 (76.9) | 29 (21.6) | 2 (1.5) | 0.61 (0.32–1.15) 0.77 |
| EPS (70) | 48 (68.6) | 20 (28.6) | 2 (2.8) | 1.38 (0.71–2.66) 0.39 |
| PDS (41) | 38 (92.7) | 3 (7.3) | 0 (0) | 0.24 (0.07–0.83) 0.02 |
| Others (32) | 24 (75) | 8 (25) | 0 (0) | 1.00 (0.40–2.48) 1.00 |
Note; G carriers, GG + CG. Statistical analysis was performed by two-sided Fisher’s exact test. The 70 EPS and 41 PDS patients contained 9 subjects, who were diagnosed as both PDS and EPS.
RANTES promoter genotypes and risk of FD in different gender and H. pylori infection status
| Variables; | genotype/n | OR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC | CG | GG | Gcarrier vs CC | |
| Control (46) | 37 | 9 | 0 | Reference |
| Over all FD (62) | 52 | 9 | 1 | 0.79 (0.29–2.14) 0.80 |
| EPS (38) | 29 | 8 | 1 | 1.28 (0.45–3.62) 0.79 |
| PDS (20) | 18 | 2 | 0 | 0.46 (0.09–2.34) 0.48 |
| Others (11) | 11 | 0 | 0 | ND |
| Control (66) | 47 | 15 | 4 | Reference |
| Over all FD (72) | 51 | 20 | 1 | 1.02 (0.49–2.13) 1.00 |
| EPS (32) | 19 | 12 | 1 | 1.13 (0.42–3.06) 0.80 |
| PDS (21) | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0.12 (0.02–0.99) 0.03 |
| Others (21) | 13 | 8 | 0 | 1.52 (0.54–4.26) 0.43 |
| Control (69) | 54 | 14 | 1 | Reference |
| Over all FD (59) | 51 | 7 | 1 | 0.56 (0.22–1.44) 0.26 |
| EPS (33) | 28 | 4 | 1 | 0.64 (0.21–1.95) 0.60 |
| PDS (19) | 18 | 1 | 0 | 0.20 (0.02–1.62) 0.18 |
| Others (10) | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0.90 (0.17–4.69) 1.00 |
| Control (43) | 30 | 10 | 3 | Reference |
| Over all FD (75) | 52 | 22 | 1 | 1.02 (0.45–2.30) 1.00 |
| EPS (37) | 20 | 16 | 1 | 1.96 (0.78–4.91) 0.17 |
| PDS (22) | 20 | 2 | 0 | 0.23 (0.05–1.13) 0.07 |
| Others (22) | 16 | 6 | 0 | 0.87 (0.28–2.71) 1.00 |
Note; G carriers, GG + CG. Statistical analysis was performed by two-sided Fisher’s exact test. The Hp(−) FD patients contained 7 subjects, who were diagnosed as both PDS and EPS. The Hp(+) FD patients contained 2 subjects, who were diagnosed as both PDS and EPS. The male FD patients contained 3 subjects, who were diagnosed as both PDS and EPS. The female FD patients contained 5 subjects, who were diagnosed as both PDS and EPS.