Literature DB >> 21709345

Experimental verification of IMPT treatment plans in an anthropomorphic phantom in the presence of delivery uncertainties.

F Albertini1, M Casiraghi, S Lorentini, B Rombi, A J Lomax.   

Abstract

Clinically relevant intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment plans were measured in a newly developed anthropomorphic phantom (i) to assess plan accuracy in the presence of high heterogeneity and (ii) to measure plan robustness in the case of treatment uncertainties (range and spatial). The new phantom consists of five different tissue substitute materials simulating different tissue types and was cut into sagittal planes so as to facilitate the verification of co-planar proton fields. GafChromic films were positioned in the different planes of the phantom, and 3D-IMPT and distal edge tracking (DET) plans were delivered to a volume simulating a skull base chordoma. In addition, treatments planned on CTs of the phantom with HU units modified were delivered to simulate systematic range uncertainties (range-error treatments). Finally, plans were delivered with the phantom rotated to simulate spatial errors. Results show excellent agreement between the calculated and the measured dose distribution: >99% and 98% of points with a gamma value <1 (3%/3 mm) for the 3D-IMPT and the DET plan, respectively. For both range and spatial errors, the 3D-IMPT plan was more robust than the DET plan. Both plans were more robust to range than to the spatial uncertainties. Finally, for range error treatments, measured distributions were compared to a model for predicting delivery errors in the treatment planning system. Good agreement has been found between the model and the measurements for both types of IMPT plan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21709345     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/14/012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  9 in total

Review 1.  Treatment planning optimisation in proton therapy.

Authors:  S E McGowan; N G Burnet; A J Lomax
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Multifield optimization intensity-modulated proton therapy (MFO-IMPT) for prostate cancer: Robustness analysis through simulation of rotational and translational alignment errors.

Authors:  Thomas J Pugh; Richard A Amos; Sandra John Baptiste; Seungtaek Choi; Quyhn Nhu Nguyen; X Ronald Zhu; Matthew B Palmer; Andrew K Lee
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 1.482

3.  Influence of Radiation Dose, Photon Energy, and Reconstruction Kernel on rho/z Analysis in Spectral Computer Tomography: A Phantom Study.

Authors:  Vasiliki Chatzaraki; Alessandra Bolsi; Rahel A Kubik-Huch; Bernhard Schmidt; Antony John Lomax; Damien C Weber; Michael Thali; Tilo Niemann
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Dosimetry in brain tumor phantom at 15 MV 3D conformal radiation therapy.

Authors:  Larissa Thompson; Humberto Galvão Dias; Tarcísio Passos Ribeiro Campos
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Dosimetric robustness against setup errors in charged particle radiotherapy of skull base tumors.

Authors:  Filippo Ammazzalorso; Urszula Jelen; Rita Engenhart-Cabillic; Wolfgang Schlegel
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Methodology paper: a novel phantom setup for commissioning of scanned ion beam delivery and TPS.

Authors:  O Jäkel; B Ackermann; S Ecker; M Ellerbrock; P Heeg; K Henkner; M Winter
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Beam commissioning of the first compact proton therapy system with spot scanning and dynamic field collimation.

Authors:  Gloria Vilches-Freixas; Mirko Unipan; Ilaria Rinaldi; Jonathan Martens; Erik Roijen; Isabel P Almeida; Esther Decabooter; Geert Bosmans
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Application of failure mode and effects analysis to treatment planning in scanned proton beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Marie Claire Cantone; Mario Ciocca; Francesco Dionisi; Piero Fossati; Stefano Lorentini; Marco Krengli; Silvia Molinelli; Roberto Orecchia; Marco Schwarz; Ivan Veronese; Viviana Vitolo
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Accuracy of robotic patient positioners used in ion beam therapy.

Authors:  Olaf Nairz; Marcus Winter; Peter Heeg; Oliver Jäkel
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.481

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.