Literature DB >> 23747223

Multifield optimization intensity-modulated proton therapy (MFO-IMPT) for prostate cancer: Robustness analysis through simulation of rotational and translational alignment errors.

Thomas J Pugh1, Richard A Amos, Sandra John Baptiste, Seungtaek Choi, Quyhn Nhu Nguyen, X Ronald Zhu, Matthew B Palmer, Andrew K Lee.   

Abstract

To evaluate the dosimetric consequences of rotational and translational alignment errors in patients receiving intensity-modulated proton therapy with multifield optimization (MFO-IMPT) for prostate cancer. Ten control patients with localized prostate cancer underwent treatment planning for MFO-IMPT. Rotational and translation errors were simulated along each of 3 axes: anterior-posterior (A-P), superior-inferior (S-I), and left-right. Clinical target-volume (CTV) coverage remained high with all alignment errors simulated. Rotational errors did not result in significant rectum or bladder dose perturbations. Translational errors resulted in larger dose perturbations to the bladder and rectum. Perturbations in rectum and bladder doses were minimal for rotational errors and larger for translational errors. Rectum V45 and V70 increased most with A-P misalignment, whereas bladder V45 and V70 changed most with S-I misalignment. The bladder and rectum V45 and V70 remained acceptable even with extreme alignment errors. Even with S-I and A-P translational errors of up to 5mm, the dosimetric profile of MFO-IMPT remained favorable. MFO-IMPT for localized prostate cancer results in robust coverage of the CTV without clinically meaningful dose perturbations to normal tissue despite extreme rotational and translational alignment errors.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IMPT; Prostate cancer; Proton therapy; Robustness

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23747223      PMCID: PMC3966198          DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2013.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Dosim        ISSN: 1873-4022            Impact factor:   1.482


  14 in total

1.  Intensity modulated proton therapy: a clinical example.

Authors:  A J Lomax; T Boehringer; A Coray; E Egger; G Goitein; M Grossmann; P Juelke; S Lin; E Pedroni; B Rohrer; W Roser; B Rossi; B Siegenthaler; O Stadelmann; H Stauble; C Vetter; L Wisser
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Robust optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Xiaodong Zhang; Yupeng Li; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Helical tomotherapy and intensity modulated proton therapy in the treatment of early stage prostate cancer: a treatment planning comparison.

Authors:  Marco Schwarz; Alessio Pierelli; Claudio Fiorino; Francesco Fellin; Giovanni Mauro Cattaneo; Cesare Cozzarini; Nadia Di Muzio; Riccardo Calandrino; Lamberto Widesott
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Potential role of intensity modulated proton beams in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  L Cella; A Lomax; R Miralbell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Worst case optimization: a method to account for uncertainties in the optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  D Pflugfelder; J J Wilkens; U Oelfke
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  Comparison of carbon ions versus protons.

Authors:  Uli Weber; Gerhard Kraft
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.360

7.  Commissioning of the discrete spot scanning proton beam delivery system at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Proton Therapy Center, Houston.

Authors:  Michael T Gillin; Narayan Sahoo; Martin Bues; George Ciangaru; Gabriel Sawakuchi; Falk Poenisch; Bijan Arjomandy; Craig Martin; Uwe Titt; Kazumichi Suzuki; Alfred R Smith; X Ronald Zhu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  A comparison of proton therapy and IMRT treatment plans for prostate radiotherapy.

Authors:  S J Dowdell; P E Metcalfe; J E Morales; M Jackson; A B Rosenfeld
Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.430

9.  Influence of rectal volume changes during radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a predictive model for mild-to-moderate late rectal toxicity.

Authors:  Raymond Miralbell; Daniel Taussky; Olivier Rinaldi; Antony Lomax; Sandra Canales; Lluis Escude; Philippe Nouet; Orhan Ozsoy; Michel Rouzaud
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Spot scanning proton beam therapy for prostate cancer: treatment planning technique and analysis of consequences of rotational and translational alignment errors.

Authors:  Jeff Meyer; Jaques Bluett; Richard Amos; Larry Levy; Seungtaek Choi; Quynh-Nhu Nguyen; X Ron Zhu; Michael Gillin; Andrew Lee
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  11 in total

1.  Dependence of the safe rectum dose on the CTV-PTV margin size and treatment technique.

Authors:  Pawel Kukołowicz; Helena Kukołowicz; Izabela Tyburska
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-01-07

2.  Proton energy optimization and reduction for intensity-modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Wenhua Cao; Gino Lim; Li Liao; Yupeng Li; Shengpeng Jiang; Xiaoqiang Li; Heng Li; Kazumichi Suzuki; X Ronald Zhu; Daniel Gomez; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Proton Beam Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Results from a Prospective Quality-of-Life Trial.

Authors:  Thomas J Pugh; Seungtaek Choi; Graciela M Nogueras-Gonzalaez; Quyhn Nhu Nguyen; Usama Mahmood; Steven J Frank; Benson Mathai; X Ron Zhu; Narayan Sahoo; Michael Gillin; Deborah A Kuban; Karen E Hoffman; Sean E McGuire; Andrew K Lee
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2016-08-29

4.  Dosimetric and radiobiological impact of intensity modulated proton therapy and RapidArc planning for high-risk prostate cancer with seminal vesicles.

Authors:  Suresh Rana; ChihYao Cheng; Li Zhao; SungYong Park; Gary Larson; Carlos Vargas; Megan Dunn; Yuanshui Zheng
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2016-05-11

5.  Assessment of Knowledge-Based Planning for Prostate Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Yihang Xu; Nellie Brovold; Jonathan Cyriac; Elizabeth Bossart; Kyle Padgett; Michael Butkus; Tejan Diwanj; Adam King; Alan Dal Pra; Matt Abramowitz; Alan Pollack; Nesrin Dogan
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2021-06-15

6.  A study to determine the impact of IMPT optimization techniques on prostate synthetic CT image sets dose comparison against CT image sets.

Authors:  Gipson Joe Anto; Sureka Sekaran; Bojarajan Perumal; Natarajan Ramar; R Vaitheeswaran; S K Karthikeyan
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2022-03-22

7.  Analysis of the Rate of Re-planning in Spot-Scanning Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Yue-Houng Hu; Riley H Harper; Noelle C Deiter; Jaden D Evans; Anita Mahajan; Jon J Kruse; Daniel W Mundy
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2022-06-28

8.  A method for acquiring random range uncertainty probability distributions in proton therapy.

Authors:  S M Holloway; M D Holloway; S J Thomas
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  Proton therapy- the modality of choice for future radiation therapy management of Prostate Cancer?

Authors:  Sophie Mangan; Michelle Leech
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-10-11

10.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for whole pelvis irradiation in prostate cancer: A dosimetric and plan robustness study between photons and protons.

Authors:  Ashley L K Ong; K W Ang; Zubin Master; Sharon M M Wong; Jeffrey K L Tuan
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-04-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.