Literature DB >> 21708804

Parents' experiences of expanded newborn screening evaluations.

Jane M DeLuca1, Margaret H Kearney, Sally A Norton, Georgianne L Arnold.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Abnormal results of newborn screening for common metabolic diseases are known to create substantial distress for parents. We explored parents' perceptions during diagnostic evaluations for newer disorders that are less well understood.
METHODS: Thirty families completed 48 open-ended interviews before and/or after parents received confirmatory test results for their infants. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyze the data.
RESULTS: Parents were shocked by the notification of the abnormal test result. Their urgent and often frustrating searches for information dominated the early phase of the screening process. Treatment center personnel were mainly informative and reassuring, but waiting for results exacerbated parents' distress. Equivocal results from diagnostic testing created uncertainties for parents regarding their infants' long-term health. After counseling, some parents reported inaccurate ideas about the disorders despite exposure to large amounts of information. Regardless of the challenges and anxieties of the evaluation, nearly every parent thought newborn screening was an important program for infant health.
CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of a newborn for an abnormal screening result was highly stressful for parents. To help reduce parents' distress, improvements in communications and clinical services are needed. Recommendations of useful Internet sites and discussions of this information may benefit parents. Tailoring counseling to meet the needs of culturally and educationally diverse families is needed. Families and infants with equivocal results are a new group of patients who merit comprehensive clinical follow-up.
Copyright © 2011 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21708804     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-3413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  21 in total

1.  Design and evaluation of a decision aid for inviting parents to participate in a fragile X newborn screening pilot study.

Authors:  Donald B Bailey; Megan A Lewis; Shelly L Harris; Tracey Grant; Carla Bann; Ellen Bishop; Myra Roche; Sonia Guarda; Leah Barnum; Cynthia Powell; Bradford L Therrell
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Psychosocial Distress and Knowledge Deficiencies in Parents of Children in Ireland Who Carry an Altered Cystic Fibrosis Gene.

Authors:  S J Quigley; B Linnane; S Connellan; A Ward; P Ryan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Lessons Learned From Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Defects.

Authors:  Matthew E Oster; Susan W Aucott; Jill Glidewell; Jesse Hackell; Lazaros Kochilas; Gerard R Martin; Julia Phillippi; Nelangi M Pinto; Annamarie Saarinen; Marci Sontag; Alex R Kemper
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Treatment of infants identified as having severe combined immunodeficiency by means of newborn screening.

Authors:  Morna J Dorsey; Christopher C Dvorak; Morton J Cowan; Jennifer M Puck
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 10.793

5.  Exploring the Issues Surrounding Clinical Exome Sequencing in the Prenatal Setting.

Authors:  Swetha Narayanan; Bruce Blumberg; Marla L Clayman; Vivian Pan; Catherine Wicklund
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Internet use by parents of infants with positive newborn screens.

Authors:  Jane M DeLuca; Margaret H Kearney; Sally A Norton; Georgianne L Arnold
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 4.982

7.  Parental intentions to enroll children in a voluntary expanded newborn screening program.

Authors:  Ryan S Paquin; Holly L Peay; Lisa M Gehtland; Megan A Lewis; Donald B Bailey
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Lessons that newborn screening in the USA can teach us about biobanking and large-scale genetic studies.

Authors:  Beth A Tarini; John D Lantos
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Parents' Experiences of Receiving the Initial Positive Newborn Screening (NBS) Result for Cystic Fibrosis and Sickle Cell Disease.

Authors:  Jane Chudleigh; Sarah Buckingham; Jo Dignan; Sandra O'Driscoll; Kemi Johnson; David Rees; Hilary Wyatt; Alison Metcalfe
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Women's experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing results.

Authors:  Barbara A Bernhardt; Danielle Soucier; Karen Hanson; Melissa S Savage; Laird Jackson; Ronald J Wapner
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.