Literature DB >> 23599719

Lessons that newborn screening in the USA can teach us about biobanking and large-scale genetic studies.

Beth A Tarini1, John D Lantos.   

Abstract

The intent in establishing newborn screening programs was not to create and sustain a large-scale genetic biobanks. Instead, newborn screening programs were designed as a public health program. As such, they have successfully screened millions of asymptomatic newborns for disease that, undiagnosed and untreated, would cause disability or death. However, historical decisions on retention of residual samples and technological innovation have forced these programs and their proponents to confront the prospect of biobanking and the conduct of large-scale genetic studies. We suggest that the challenges facing newborn screening can provide important lessons for other biobanking and large-scale genetic testing endeavors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biobanking; genetics; newborn screening; screening

Year:  2013        PMID: 23599719      PMCID: PMC3626167          DOI: 10.2217/pme.12.115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Per Med        ISSN: 1741-0541            Impact factor:   2.512


  40 in total

1.  Pilot programs in newborn screening.

Authors:  Kenneth Pass; Nancy S Green; Fred Lorey; John Sherwin; Anne Marie Comeau
Journal:  Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2006

2.  Guidelines for the retention, storage, and use of residual dried blood spot samples after newborn screening analysis: statement of the Council of Regional Networks for Genetic Services.

Authors:  B L Therrell; W H Hannon; K A Pass; F Lorey; C Brokopp; J Eckman; M Glass; R Heidenreich; S Kinney; S Kling; G Landenburger; F J Meaney; E R McCabe; S Panny; M Schwartz; E Shapira
Journal:  Biochem Mol Med       Date:  1996-04

3.  The Michigan BioTrust for Health: using dried bloodspots for research to benefit the community while respecting the individual.

Authors:  Denise Chrysler; Harry McGee; Janice Bach; Ed Goldman; Peter D Jacobson
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.718

4.  Newborn screening: a spot of trouble.

Authors:  Mary Carmichael
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Newborn screening program practices in the United States: notification, research, and consent.

Authors:  Kenneth D Mandl; Shlomit Feit; Cecilia Larson; Isaac S Kohane
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception.

Authors:  P S Appelbaum; L H Roth; C W Lidz; P Benson; W Winslade
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.683

7.  Pediatric biobanks: approaching informed consent for continuing research after children grow up.

Authors:  Aaron J Goldenberg; Sara Chandros Hull; Jeffrey R Botkin; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.406

8.  Developing a simplified consent form for biobanking.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Joëlle Y Friedman; N Chantelle Hardy; Li Lin; Kevin P Weinfurt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Whole-genome amplified DNA from stored dried blood spots is reliable in high resolution melting curve and sequencing analysis.

Authors:  Bo G Winkel; Mads V Hollegaard; Morten S Olesen; Jesper H Svendsen; Stig Haunsø; David M Hougaard; Jacob Tfelt-Hansen
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.103

10.  Whole genome microarray analysis, from neonatal blood cards.

Authors:  Jill Hardin; Richard H Finnell; David Wong; Michael E Hogan; Joy Horovitz; Jenny Shu; Gary M Shaw
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 2.797

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Behavioral Genetics in Criminal and Civil Courts.

Authors:  Maya Sabatello; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Harv Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 2.  New directions in cancer and aging: State of the science and recommendations to improve the quality of evidence on the intersection of aging with cancer control.

Authors:  Lindsay C Kobayashi; Ashly C Westrick; Aalap Doshi; Katrina R Ellis; Carly R Jones; Elizabeth LaPensee; Alison M Mondul; Megan A Mullins; Lauren P Wallner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 6.921

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.