Literature DB >> 21704974

The effect of regionalization on outcome in esophagectomy: a Canadian national study.

Christian J Finley1, Lindsay Jacks, Shaf Keshavjee, Gail Darling.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Regionalization of specialized surgical services has been proposed to improve outcomes based on the reported association between volume and outcomes. The effect of regionalization of esophagectomy on in-hospital mortality (IHM) and length of stay (LOS) was examined.
METHODS: Data from a Canadian database for 6985 patients (74% men; median age, 66 years) who underwent esophagectomy (1998 to 2007) were analyzed with a multivariable mixed model regression controlling for age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, and year of esophagectomy to evaluate the effect of hospital volume. Volume changes were evaluated within and between hospitals.
RESULTS: From 1998 to 2007, the number of hospitals performing esophagectomies decreased (101 to 85). The percentage of patients treated in large-volume (>20 cases/year) centers increased (29% to 61%) and IHM decreased (9.1% to 3.6%). The odds of IHM decreased 64% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51% to 74%), and LOS decreased 38% (95% CI, 34% to 43%). Comparing between hospitals, an increase of 10 cases was associated with a 15% decrease in IHM (95% CI, 6% to 23%, p=0.001) and a 10% increase in LOS (95% CI, 2% to 19%, p=0.01). Within an individual hospital, the relationship between increasing volume and LOS or IHM was not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital mortality for esophagectomy has decreased in Canada but was not significantly reduced when volume was increased within a given hospital. Improved IHM may be related to selective referral of patients to high-volume hospitals. Although, decreased IHM is not solely attributable to volume changes, our results support regionalization policies for esophagectomy.
Copyright © 2011 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21704974     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.02.089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  13 in total

1.  Variations in the quality of care at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Quoc-Dien Trinh; Jesse Sammon; Jay Jhaveri; Maxine Sun; Khurshid R Ghani; Jan Schmitges; Wooju Jeong; James O Peabody; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Mani Menon
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2012-04

2.  A look at the thoracic surgery workforce in Canada: how demographics and scope of practice may impact future workforce needs.

Authors:  Sean C Grondin; Colin Schieman; Elizabeth Kelly; Gail Darling; Donna Maziak; Moné Palacios Mackay; Gary Gelfand
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 3.  Esophageal surgery in Italy. Criteria to identify the hospital units and the tertiary referral centers entitled to perform it.

Authors:  Paolo Parise; Ugo Elmore; Uberto Fumagalli; Giovanni De Manzoni; Simone Giacopuzzi; Riccardo Rosati
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-05-30

4.  A perspective on the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Composite Score for evaluating esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Shuyin Liang; James D Luketich; Inderpal S Sarkaria
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Geographic variation in surgical practice patterns and outcomes for resected nonmetastatic gastric cancer in Ontario.

Authors:  A L Mahar; A El-Sedfy; M Dixon; M Siddiqui; M Elmi; A Ritter; J Vasilevska-Ristovska; Y Jeong; L Helyer; C Law; B Zagorski; N G Coburn
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Recommendations for the improvement of bladder cancer quality of care in Canada: A consensus document reviewed and endorsed by Bladder Cancer Canada (BCC), Canadian Urologic Oncology Group (CUOG), and Canadian Urological Association (CUA), December 2015.

Authors:  Wassim Kassouf; Armen Aprikian; Peter Black; Girish Kulkarni; Jonathan Izawa; Libni Eapen; Adrian Fairey; Alan So; Scott North; Ricardo Rendon; Srikala S Sridhar; Tarik Alam; Fadi Brimo; Normand Blais; Chris Booth; Joseph Chin; Peter Chung; Darrel Drachenberg; Yves Fradet; Michael Jewett; Ron Moore; Chris Morash; Bobby Shayegan; Geoffrey Gotto; Neil Fleshner; Fred Saad; D Robert Siemens
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair, race, and volume in thoracic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Philip P Goodney; Benjamin S Brooke; Jessica Wallaert; Lori Travis; F Lee Lucas; David C Goodman; Jack L Cronenwett; David H Stone
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Mortality after esophageal and gastric cancer resection.

Authors:  Ugo Fedeli; Elena Schievano; Manola Lisiero
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Regionalization of thoracic surgery improves short-term cancer esophagectomy outcomes.

Authors:  Sora Ely; Amy Alabaster; Simon K Ashiku; Ashish Patel; Jeffrey B Velotta
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Spontaneous regionalization of esophageal cancer surgery: an analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Brian N Arnold; Alexander S Chiu; Jessica R Hoag; Clara H Kim; Michelle C Salazar; Justin D Blasberg; Daniel J Boffa
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.