Literature DB >> 27240756

Esophageal surgery in Italy. Criteria to identify the hospital units and the tertiary referral centers entitled to perform it.

Paolo Parise1, Ugo Elmore2, Uberto Fumagalli3, Giovanni De Manzoni4, Simone Giacopuzzi4, Riccardo Rosati2.   

Abstract

Esophageal cancer incidence is rapidly increasing in the western countries. Adenocarcinoma has recently become the most frequent subtype because of the changes in lifestyle. As observed for other types of surgery, even for esophageal surgery better results have been observed in centers with high volume of activity. Countries with formal policies of centralization, as Great Britain and The Netherlands, have got lower mortality and longer survival than those obtained before the centralization program introduction and of those countries without centralization programs. However, concerns about accessibility to high volume hospitals for lower level social strata have emerged in different countries. In Italy most of the esophagectomies for cancer are performed in very low volume centers with limited experience. High volume centers with >20 cases/year are few but, even if managing patients with more severe comorbidities have got a lower mortality and a shorter length of stay. The Aim of this paper is to identify the organizational, structural and volume requirements for accreditation of a center as an esophageal surgery center. Special attention must be given to a multidisciplinary approach involving different highly skilled specialists with the creation of a multidisciplinary team and individualized diagnostic and therapeutic pathways.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Centralization; Esophageal cancer; Esophagectomy; High volume hospitals; Volume outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27240756     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-016-0374-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  22 in total

1.  Demographic variations in the rising incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in white males.

Authors:  E Bollschweiler; E Wolfgarten; C Gutschow; A H Hölscher
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Postoperative mortality following oesophagectomy and problems in reporting its rate.

Authors:  G G Jamieson; G Mathew; R Ludemann; J Wayman; J C Myers; P G Devitt
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  National trends in esophageal surgery--are outcomes as good as we believe?

Authors:  Geoffrey Paul Kohn; Joseph Anton Galanko; Michael Owen Meyers; Richard Harry Feins; Timothy Michael Farrell
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world.

Authors:  Farin Kamangar; Graça M Dores; William F Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  The effect of regionalization on outcome in esophagectomy: a Canadian national study.

Authors:  Christian J Finley; Lindsay Jacks; Shaf Keshavjee; Gail Darling
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  The role of overdiagnosis and reclassification in the marked increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence.

Authors:  Heiko Pohl; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Does minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provide for comparable oncologic outcomes to open techniques? A systematic review.

Authors:  Marc M Dantoc; Michael R Cox; Guy D Eslick
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kamal Nagpal; Kamran Ahmed; Amit Vats; Danny Yakoub; David James; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi; Krishna Moorthy; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Centralization of esophageal cancer surgery: does it improve clinical outcome?

Authors:  M W J M Wouters; H E Karim-Kos; S le Cessie; B P L Wijnhoven; L P S Stassen; W H Steup; H W Tilanus; R A E M Tollenaar
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Is It Time to Centralize High-risk Cancer Care in the United States? Comparison of Outcomes of Esophagectomy Between England and the United States.

Authors:  Aruna Munasinghe; Sheraz R Markar; Ravikrishna Mamidanna; Ara W Darzi; Omar D Faiz; George B Hanna; Donald E Low
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Is There a Rationale for Structural Quality Assurance in Esophageal Surgery?

Authors:  Torben Glatz; Jens Höppner
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-03-24

2.  Evaluation of the Effect of Operator Experience on Outcome of Hepatic Artery Embolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Tertiary Cancer Center.

Authors:  Hooman Yarmohammadi; Adrian J Gonzalez-Aguirre; Majid Maybody; Etay Ziv; F Edward Boas; Joseph P Erinjeri; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Stephen B Solomon; George Getrajdman
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.173

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.