Literature DB >> 30464695

Geographic variation in surgical practice patterns and outcomes for resected nonmetastatic gastric cancer in Ontario.

A L Mahar1,2, A El-Sedfy1, M Dixon1,3, M Siddiqui1, M Elmi1, A Ritter1, J Vasilevska-Ristovska4, Y Jeong1,2,5, L Helyer6, C Law3,5,7, B Zagorski5, N G Coburn3,5,7.   

Abstract

Background: Gastrectomy with negative resection margins and adequate lymph node dissection is the cornerstone of curative treatment for gastric cancer (gc). However, gastrectomy is a complex and invasive operation with significant morbidity and mortality. Little is known about surgical practice patterns or short- and long-term outcomes in early-stage gc in Canada.
Methods: We undertook a population-based retrospective cohort study of patients with gc diagnosed between 1 April 2005 and 31 March 2008. Chart review provided clinical and operative details such as disease stage, primary tumour location, surgical approach, operation, lymph nodes, and resection margins. Administrative data provided patient demographics, geography, and vital status. Variations in treatment and outcomes were compared for 14 local health integration networks. Descriptive statistics and log-rank tests were used to examine geographic variation.
Results: We identified 722 patients with nonmetastatic resected gc. We documented significant provincial variation in case mix, including primary tumour location, stage at diagnosis, and tumour grade. Short-term surgical outcomes varied across the province. The percentage of patients with 15 or fewer lymph nodes removed and examined varied from 41.8% to 73.8% (p = 0.02), and the rate of positive surgical margins ranged from 15.2% to 50.0% (p = 0.002). The 30-day surgical mortality rates did not vary statistically significantly across the province (p = 0.13); however, rates ranged from 0% to 16.7%. Overall 5-year survival was 44% and ranged from 31% to 55% across the province. Conclusions: This cohort of patients with resected stages i-iii gc is the largest analyzed in Canada, providing important historical information about treatment outcomes. Understanding the causes of regional variation will support interventions aiming to improve gc operative outcomes in the cancer system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Surgery; prognosis; variations

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30464695      PMCID: PMC6209544          DOI: 10.3747/co.25.3953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  29 in total

1.  Outcome Disparities in Pancreatic Cancer: Need for Improved Regionalization of Care.

Authors:  Daniel A Anaya; Mokenge Malafa
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Quality indicators for gastric cancer surgery: a survey of practicing pathologists in Ontario.

Authors:  Alia P Qureshi; C Andrea Ottensmeyer; Alyson L Mahar; Runjan Chetty; Aaron Pollett; Frances C Wright; Natalie G Coburn
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  The effect of regionalization on outcome in esophagectomy: a Canadian national study.

Authors:  Christian J Finley; Lindsay Jacks; Shaf Keshavjee; Gail Darling
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Improving outcome for patients with pancreatic cancer through centralization.

Authors:  V E P P Lemmens; K Bosscha; G van der Schelling; S Brenninkmeijer; J W W Coebergh; I H J T de Hingh
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  The National Cancer Data Base Report on poor survival of U.S. gastric carcinoma patients treated with gastrectomy: Fifth Edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging, proximal disease, and the "different disease" hypothesis.

Authors:  S A Hundahl; J L Phillips; H R Menck
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Variations in gastric cancer care: a trend beyond racial disparities.

Authors:  Waddah B Al-Refaie; Greer Gay; Beth A Virnig; Jennifer F Tseng; Andrew Stewart; Selwyn M Vickers; Todd M Tuttle; Barry W Feig
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Trends in the use of evidence-based therapy for resectable gastric cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca A Snyder; David F Penson; Shenghua Ni; Tatsuki Koyama; Nipun B Merchant
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.454

8.  Is gastric cancer different in Korea and the United States? Impact of tumor location on prognosis.

Authors:  Jung Ho Shim; Kyo Young Song; Hae Myung Jeon; Cho Hyun Park; Lindsay M Jacks; Mithat Gonen; Manish A Shah; Murray F Brennan; Daniel G Coit; Vivian E Strong
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Prognostic relevance of demographics and surgical practice for patients with gastric cancer in two centers: in Poland versus Germany.

Authors:  Radoslaw Jaworski; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Arnulf H Holscher; Stefan P Monig; Jaroslaw Skokowski; Jacek Zielinski; Maciej Swierblewski; Andrzej Kopacz; Janusz Jaskiewicz
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-03-26       Impact factor: 7.370

10.  Centralization of esophageal cancer surgery: does it improve clinical outcome?

Authors:  M W J M Wouters; H E Karim-Kos; S le Cessie; B P L Wijnhoven; L P S Stassen; W H Steup; H W Tilanus; R A E M Tollenaar
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  2 in total

1.  Gastrectomy case volume and textbook outcome: an analysis of the Population Registry of Esophageal and Stomach Tumours of Ontario (PRESTO).

Authors:  Jordan Levy; Vaibhav Gupta; Elmira Amirazodi; Catherine Allen-Ayodabo; Naheed Jivraj; Yunni Jeong; Laura E Davis; Alyson L Mahar; Charles De Mestral; Olli Saarela; Natalie Coburn
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Population Registry of Esophageal and Stomach Tumours in Ontario (PRESTO): protocol for a multicentre clinical and pathological database including 25 000 patients.

Authors:  Vaibhav Gupta; Jordan Levy; Catherine Allen-Ayodabo; Elmira Amirazodi; Laura Davis; Qing Li; Alyson Mahar; Natalie G Coburn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.