Literature DB >> 22496709

Variations in the quality of care at radical prostatectomy.

Quoc-Dien Trinh, Jesse Sammon, Jay Jhaveri, Maxine Sun, Khurshid R Ghani, Jan Schmitges, Wooju Jeong, James O Peabody, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Mani Menon.   

Abstract

Postoperative morbidity and mortality is low following radical prostatectomy (RP), though not inconsequential. Due to the natural history of the disease process, the implications of treatment on long-term oncologic control and functional outcomes are of increased significance. Structures, processes and outcomes are the three main determinants of quality of RP care and provide the framework for this review. Structures affecting quality of care include hospital and surgeon volume, hospital teaching status and patient insurance type. Process determinants of RP care have been poorly studied, by and large, but there is a developing trend toward the performance of randomized trials to assess the merits of evolving RP techniques. Finally, the direct study of RP outcomes has been particularly controversial and includes the development of quality of life measurement tools, combined outcomes measures, and the use of utilities to measure operative success based on individual patient priority.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hospital volume; prostatectomy; prostatic neoplasms; quality of care; surgeon volume

Year:  2012        PMID: 22496709      PMCID: PMC3317540          DOI: 10.1177/1756287211433187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Adv Urol        ISSN: 1756-2872


  72 in total

1.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Specificity of procedure volume and in-hospital mortality association.

Authors:  Veerajalandhar Allareddy; Veerasathpurush Allareddy; Badrinath R Konety
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Walter Artibani; Andrea Cestari; Antonio Galfano; Markus Graefen; Giorgio Guazzoni; Bertrand Guillonneau; Mani Menon; Francesco Montorsi; Vipul Patel; Jens Rassweiler; Hendrik Van Poppel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-01-25       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival.

Authors:  Daniel A Barocas; Shady Salem; Yakup Kordan; S Duke Herrell; Sam S Chang; Peter E Clark; Rodney Davis; Roxelyn Baumgartner; Sharon Phillips; Michael S Cookson; Joseph A Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  The effect of regionalization on outcome in esophagectomy: a Canadian national study.

Authors:  Christian J Finley; Lindsay Jacks; Shaf Keshavjee; Gail Darling
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Colin B Begg; Elyn R Riedel; Peter B Bach; Michael W Kattan; Deborah Schrag; Joan L Warren; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Trends in regionalization of inpatient care for urological malignancies, 1988 to 2002.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Sanjukta Modak; Badrinath R Konety
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Patient, surgeon, and treatment characteristics associated with homologous blood transfusion requirement during radical retropubic prostatectomy: multivariate nomogram to assist patient counseling.

Authors:  Atreya Dash; Rodney L Dunn; Jennifer Resh; John T Wei; James E Montie; Martin G Sanda
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Preferences of husbands and wives for outcomes of prostate cancer screening and treatment.

Authors:  Robert J Volk; Scott B Cantor; Alvah R Cass; Stephen J Spann; Susan C Weller; Murray D Krahn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Radical retropubic prostatectomy for localized carcinoma of the prostate in a large metropolitan hospital: changing trends over a 10-year period (1984-1994). Dallas Outcomes Research Group for Urological Disorders.

Authors:  S E Litwiller; B Djavan; B V Klopukh; J C Richier; C G Roehrborn
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  2 in total

1.  Influence of the facility caseload on the subsequent survival of men with localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Afsaneh Barzi; Primo N Lara; Denice Tsao-Wei; Dongyun Yang; Inderbir S Gill; Siamak Daneshmand; Eric A Klein; Jacek K Pinski; David F Penson; David I Quinn; Sarmad Sadeghi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Variation in guideline adherence in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma care: impact of patient and hospital characteristics.

Authors:  Jozette J C Stienen; Rosella P M G Hermens; Lianne Wennekes; Saskia A M van de Schans; Richard W M van der Maazen; Helena M Dekker; Janine Liefers; Johan H J M van Krieken; Nicole M A Blijlevens; Petronella B Ottevanger
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 4.430

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.