Literature DB >> 21700482

Non-cryogenic anatomical imaging in ultra-low field regime: hand MRI demonstration.

I Savukov1, T Karaulanov, A Castro, P Volegov, A Matlashov, A Urbatis, J Gomez, M Espy.   

Abstract

Ultra-low field (ULF) MRI with a pulsed prepolarization is a promising method with potential for applications where conventional high-, mid-, and low-field medical MRI cannot be used due to cost, weight, or other restrictions. Previously, successful ULF demonstrations of anatomical imaging were made using liquid helium-cooled SQUIDs and conducted inside a magnetically shielded room. The Larmor frequency for these demonstrations was ∼3 kHz. In order to make ULF MRI more accessible, portable, and inexpensive, we have recently developed a non-cryogenic system. To eliminate the requirement for a magnetically shielded room and improve the detection sensitivity, we increased the frequency to 83.6 kHz. While the background noise at these frequencies is greatly reduced, this is still within the ULF regime and most of its advantages such as simplicity in magnetic field generation hardware, and less stringent requirements for uniform fields, remaining. In this paper we demonstrate use of this system to image a human hand with up to 1.5mm resolution. The signal-to-noise ratio was sufficient to reveal anatomical features within a scan time of less than 7 min. This prototype can be scaled up for constructing head and full body scanners, and work is in progress toward demonstration of head imaging. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21700482      PMCID: PMC3143263          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2011.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson        ISSN: 1090-7807            Impact factor:   2.229


  25 in total

1.  Uniform magnetic fields and double-wrapped coil systems: improved techniques for the design of bioelectromagnetic experiments.

Authors:  J L Kirschvink
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.010

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging with an optical atomic magnetometer.

Authors:  Shoujun Xu; Valeriy V Yashchuk; Marcus H Donaldson; Simon M Rochester; Dmitry Budker; Alexander Pines
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Zero-field remote detection of NMR with a microfabricated atomic magnetometer.

Authors:  M P Ledbetter; I M Savukov; D Budker; V Shah; S Knappe; J Kitching; D J Michalak; S Xu; A Pines
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  MRI with an atomic magnetometer suitable for practical imaging applications.

Authors:  I M Savukov; V S Zotev; P L Volegov; M A Espy; A N Matlashov; J J Gomez; R H Kraus
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  The magnetic field dependence of proton spin relaxation in tissues.

Authors:  R G Bryant; D A Mendelson; C C Lester
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Comparison of CT, low-field-strength MR imaging, and high-field-strength MR imaging. Work in progress.

Authors:  W W Orrison; G K Stimac; E A Stevens; D L LaMasters; M C Espinosa; L Cobb; F A Mettler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  MR equipment acquisition strategies: low-field or high-field scanners.

Authors:  L Martí-Bonmatí; M Kormano
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Novel approaches to low-cost MRI.

Authors:  A Macovski; S Conolly
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Results of a prospective multicenter study for evaluation of the diagnostic quality of an open whole-body low-field MRI unit. A comparison with high-field MRI measured by the applicable gold standard.

Authors:  T Merl; M Scholz; P Gerhardt; M Langer; J Laubenberger; H D Weiss; H B Gehl; K J Wolf; I Ohnesorge
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.528

10.  Magnetic resonance diagnosis of the anterior labrum and capsule. Effect of field strength on efficacy.

Authors:  K H Allmann; O Walter; J Laubenberger; M Uhl; C H Buitrago-Tellez; N Biebow; M Langer
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.016

View more
  6 in total

1.  Non-cryogenic ultra-low field MRI of wrist-forearm area.

Authors:  I Savukov; T Karaulanov; C J V Wurden; L Schultz
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Design of a mobile, homogeneous, and efficient electromagnet with a large field of view for neonatal low-field MRI.

Authors:  Steffen Lother; Steven J Schiff; Thomas Neuberger; Peter M Jakob; Florian Fidler
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Design of a sustainable prepolarizing magnetic resonance imaging system for infant hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Johnes Obungoloch; Joshua R Harper; Steven Consevage; Igor M Savukov; Thomas Neuberger; Srinivas Tadigadapa; Steven J Schiff
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Low-Cost High-Performance MRI.

Authors:  Mathieu Sarracanie; Cristen D LaPierre; Najat Salameh; David E J Waddington; Thomas Witzel; Matthew S Rosen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Approaches in cooling of resistive coil-based low-field Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) systems for application in low resource settings.

Authors:  Faith Natukunda; Theodora M Twongyirwe; Steven J Schiff; Johnes Obungoloch
Journal:  BMC Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-02-12

6.  Fast Room Temperature Very Low Field-Magnetic Resonance Imaging System Compatible with MagnetoEncephaloGraphy Environment.

Authors:  Angelo Galante; Raffaele Sinibaldi; Allegra Conti; Cinzia De Luca; Nadia Catallo; Piero Sebastiani; Vittorio Pizzella; Gian Luca Romani; Antonello Sotgiu; Stefania Della Penna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.