Literature DB >> 21698757

How a neutral evolutionary ratchet can build cellular complexity.

Julius Lukeš1, John M Archibald, Patrick J Keeling, W Ford Doolittle, Michael W Gray.   

Abstract

Complex cellular machines and processes are commonly believed to be products of selection, and it is typically understood to be the job of evolutionary biologists to show how selective advantage can account for each step in their origin and subsequent growth in complexity. Here, we describe how complex machines might instead evolve in the absence of positive selection through a process of "presuppression," first termed constructive neutral evolution (CNE) more than a decade ago. If an autonomously functioning cellular component acquires mutations that make it dependent for function on another, pre-existing component or process, and if there are multiple ways in which such dependence may arise, then dependence inevitably will arise and reversal to independence is unlikely. Thus, CNE is a unidirectional evolutionary ratchet leading to complexity, if complexity is equated with the number of components or steps necessary to carry out a cellular process. CNE can explain "functions" that seem to make little sense in terms of cellular economy, like RNA editing or splicing, but it may also contribute to the complexity of machines with clear benefit to the cell, like the ribosome, and to organismal complexity overall. We suggest that CNE-based evolutionary scenarios are in these and other cases less forced than the selectionist or adaptationist narratives that are generally told.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21698757     DOI: 10.1002/iub.489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IUBMB Life        ISSN: 1521-6543            Impact factor:   3.885


  73 in total

1.  An exit cavity was crucial to the polymerase activity of the early ribosome.

Authors:  George E Fox; Quyen Tran; Ada Yonath
Journal:  Astrobiology       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  The evolution of multimeric protein assemblages.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Selective forces for the origin of spliceosomes.

Authors:  Matej Vesteg; Zuzana Sándorová; Juraj Krajčovič
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 4.  The falsifiability of the models for the origin of eukaryotes.

Authors:  Matej Vesteg; Juraj Krajčovič
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.886

5.  The bioenergetic costs of a gene.

Authors:  Michael Lynch; Georgi K Marinov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Evolutionary diversification of the multimeric states of proteins.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  High throughput sequencing revolution reveals conserved fundamentals of U-indel editing.

Authors:  Sara L Zimmer; Rachel M Simpson; Laurie K Read
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 9.957

Review 8.  Gene fragmentation: a key to mitochondrial genome evolution in Euglenozoa?

Authors:  Pavel Flegontov; Michael W Gray; Gertraud Burger; Julius Lukeš
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 3.886

9.  Evolutionary cell biology: two origins, one objective.

Authors:  Michael Lynch; Mark C Field; Holly V Goodson; Harmit S Malik; José B Pereira-Leal; David S Roos; Aaron P Turkewitz; Shelley Sazer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Morphological evolution in therocephalians breaks the hypercarnivore ratchet.

Authors:  Neil Brocklehurst
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.