Literature DB >> 26575626

The bioenergetic costs of a gene.

Michael Lynch1, Georgi K Marinov2.   

Abstract

An enduring mystery of evolutionary genomics concerns the mechanisms responsible for lineage-specific expansions of genome size in eukaryotes, especially in multicellular species. One idea is that all excess DNA is mutationally hazardous, but weakly enough so that genome-size expansion passively emerges in species experiencing relatively low efficiency of selection owing to small effective population sizes. Another idea is that substantial gene additions were impossible without the energetic boost provided by the colonizing mitochondrion in the eukaryotic lineage. Contrary to this latter view, analysis of cellular energetics and genomics data from a wide variety of species indicates that, relative to the lifetime ATP requirements of a cell, the costs of a gene at the DNA, RNA, and protein levels decline with cell volume in both bacteria and eukaryotes. Moreover, these costs are usually sufficiently large to be perceived by natural selection in bacterial populations, but not in eukaryotes experiencing high levels of random genetic drift. Thus, for scaling reasons that are not yet understood, by virtue of their large size alone, eukaryotic cells are subject to a broader set of opportunities for the colonization of novel genes manifesting weakly advantageous or even transiently disadvantageous phenotypic effects. These results indicate that the origin of the mitochondrion was not a prerequisite for genome-size expansion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cellular bioenergetics; evolutionary genomics; gene cost; transcription; translation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26575626      PMCID: PMC4697398          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1514974112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  19 in total

1.  The growth of micro-organisms in relation to their energy supply.

Authors:  T BAUCHOP; S R ELSDEN
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1960-12

2.  The frailty of adaptive hypotheses for the origins of organismal complexity.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  How a neutral evolutionary ratchet can build cellular complexity.

Authors:  Julius Lukeš; John M Archibald; Patrick J Keeling; W Ford Doolittle; Michael W Gray
Journal:  IUBMB Life       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.885

Review 4.  Bacterial nucleoid-associated proteins, nucleoid structure and gene expression.

Authors:  Shane C Dillon; Charles J Dorman
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 60.633

5.  Reductive evolution of proteomes and protein structures.

Authors:  Minglei Wang; Charles G Kurland; Gustavo Caetano-Anollés
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Is junk DNA bunk? A critique of ENCODE.

Authors:  W Ford Doolittle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Energetics of bacterial growth: balance of anabolic and catabolic reactions.

Authors:  J B Russell; G M Cook
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1995-03

8.  Maintenance energy: a general model for energy-limited and energy-sufficient growth.

Authors:  S J Pirt
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1982-12-03       Impact factor: 2.552

9.  Metabolic efficiency and amino acid composition in the proteomes of Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Hiroshi Akashi; Takashi Gojobori
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Body-Mass Scaling of Metabolic Rate: What are the Relative Roles of Cellular versus Systemic Effects?

Authors:  Douglas S Glazier
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2015-03-04
View more
  134 in total

1.  Energetics and population genetics at the root of eukaryotic cellular and genomic complexity.

Authors:  Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mitochondria, complexity, and evolutionary deficit spending.

Authors:  Nick Lane; William F Martin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Reply to Lane and Martin: Mitochondria do not boost the bioenergetic capacity of eukaryotic cells.

Authors:  Michael Lynch; Georgi K Marinov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Heat Oscillations Driven by the Embryonic Cell Cycle Reveal the Energetic Costs of Signaling.

Authors:  Jonathan Rodenfels; Karla M Neugebauer; Jonathon Howard
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 12.270

5.  The distribution of cellular turnover in the human body.

Authors:  Ron Sender; Ron Milo
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  Early photosynthetic eukaryotes inhabited low-salinity habitats.

Authors:  Patricia Sánchez-Baracaldo; John A Raven; Davide Pisani; Andrew H Knoll
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Disentangling the effects of selection and loss bias on gene dynamics.

Authors:  Jaime Iranzo; José A Cuesta; Susanna Manrubia; Mikhail I Katsnelson; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Energetic cost of building a virus.

Authors:  Gita Mahmoudabadi; Ron Milo; Rob Phillips
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Engineered dCas9 with reduced toxicity in bacteria: implications for genetic circuit design.

Authors:  Shuyi Zhang; Christopher A Voigt
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  A cnidarian parasite of salmon (Myxozoa: Henneguya) lacks a mitochondrial genome.

Authors:  Dayana Yahalomi; Stephen D Atkinson; Moran Neuhof; E Sally Chang; Hervé Philippe; Paulyn Cartwright; Jerri L Bartholomew; Dorothée Huchon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.