Literature DB >> 22407435

Selective forces for the origin of spliceosomes.

Matej Vesteg1, Zuzana Sándorová, Juraj Krajčovič.   

Abstract

It has been proposed that eukaryotic spliceosomes evolved from bacterial group II introns via constructive neutral changes. However, a more likely interpretation is that spliceosomes and group II introns share a common undefined RNA ancestor--a proto-spliceosome. Although, the constructive neutral evolution may have probably played some roles in the development of complexity including the evolution of modern spliceosomes, in fact, the origin, losses and the retention of spliceosomes can be explained straight-forwardly mainly by positive and negative selection: (1) proto-spliceosomes evolved in the RNA world as a mechanism to excise functional RNAs from an RNA genome and to join non-coding information (ancestral to exons) possibly designed to be degraded. (2) The complexity of proto-spliceosomes increased with the invention of protein synthesis in the RNP world and they were adopted for (a) the addition of translation signal to RNAs via trans-splicing, and for (b) the exon-shuffling such as to join together exons coding separate protein domains, to translate them as a single unit and thus to facilitate the molecular interaction of protein domains needed to be assembled to functional catalytic complexes. (3) Finally, the spliceosomes were adopted for cis-splicing of (mainly) non-coding information (contemporary introns) to yield translatable mRNAs. (4) Spliceosome-negative organisms (i.e., prokaryotes) have been selected in the DNA-protein world to save a lot of energy. (5) Spliceosome-positive organisms (i.e., eukaryotes) have been selected, because they have been completely spliceosome-dependent.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22407435     DOI: 10.1007/s00239-012-9494-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  49 in total

1.  On the possibility of constructive neutral evolution.

Authors:  A Stoltzfus
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 2.  Translation: in retrospect and prospect.

Authors:  C R Woese
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.942

3.  Comparative genomics of microbial pathogens and symbionts.

Authors:  Siv G E Andersson; Cecilia Alsmark; Björn Canbäck; Wagied Davids; Carolin Frank; Olof Karlberg; Lisa Klasson; Boris Antoine-Legault; Alex Mira; Ivica Tamas
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  In vivo kinetics of mRNA splicing and transport in mammalian cells.

Authors:  A Audibert; D Weil; F Dautry
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Cell biology. Irremediable complexity?

Authors:  Michael W Gray; Julius Lukes; John M Archibald; Patrick J Keeling; W Ford Doolittle
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Compositionally and functionally distinct editosomes in Trypanosoma brucei.

Authors:  Aswini K Panigrahi; Nancy Lewis Ernst; Gonzalo J Domingo; Michele Fleck; Reza Salavati; Kenneth D Stuart
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 4.942

7.  Evidence for multiple independent origins of trans-splicing in Metazoa.

Authors:  Vassilis Douris; Maximilian J Telford; Michalis Averof
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 8.  Gene fragmentation: a key to mitochondrial genome evolution in Euglenozoa?

Authors:  Pavel Flegontov; Michael W Gray; Gertraud Burger; Julius Lukeš
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 3.886

9.  Mutations of the two-nucleotide bulge of D5 of a group II intron block splicing in vitro and in vivo: phenotypes and suppressor mutations.

Authors:  U Schmidt; M Podar; U Stahl; P S Perlman
Journal:  RNA       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.942

10.  Order of intron removal during splicing of endogenous adenine phosphoribosyltransferase and dihydrofolate reductase pre-mRNA.

Authors:  O Kessler; Y Jiang; L A Chasin
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.272

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  On the Possibility of an Early Evolutionary Origin for the Spliced Leader Trans-Splicing.

Authors:  Zuzana Krchňáková; Juraj Krajčovič; Matej Vesteg
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Fixation and accumulation of thermotolerant catalytic competence of a pair of ligase ribozymes through complex formation and cross ligation.

Authors:  Nana Isomoto; Yuri Maeda; Takahiro Tanaka; Hiroyuki Furuta; Yoshiya Ikawa
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  The relative ages of eukaryotes and akaryotes.

Authors:  David Penny; Lesley J Collins; Toni K Daly; Simon J Cox
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Origin of spliceosomal introns and alternative splicing.

Authors:  Manuel Irimia; Scott William Roy
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 10.005

5.  Calpains in cyanobacteria and the origin of calpains.

Authors:  Dominika Vešelényiová; Lenka Hutárová; Alexandra Lukáčová; Mária Schneiderová; Matej Vesteg; Juraj Krajčovič
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 6.  Constructive neutral evolution: exploring evolutionary theory's curious disconnect.

Authors:  Arlin Stoltzfus
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 4.540

7.  Distribution of conventional and nonconventional introns in tubulin (α and β) genes of euglenids.

Authors:  Rafał Milanowski; Anna Karnkowska; Takao Ishikawa; Bozena Zakryś
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 8.  Domestication of self-splicing introns during eukaryogenesis: the rise of the complex spliceosomal machinery.

Authors:  Julian Vosseberg; Berend Snel
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.540

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.