Literature DB >> 21698486

Improvement of robustness and ethanol production of ethanologenic Saccharomyces cerevisiae under co-stress of heat and inhibitors.

Ying Lu1, Yan-Fei Cheng, Xiu-Ping He, Xue-Na Guo, Bo-Run Zhang.   

Abstract

Bioethanol is an attractive alternative to fossil fuels. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the most important ethanol producer. However, yeast cells are challenged by various environmental stresses during the industrial process of ethanol production. The robustness under heat, acetic acid, and furfural stresses was improved for ethanologenic S. cerevisiae in this work using genome shuffling. Recombinant yeast strain R32 could grow at 45°C, and resist 0.55% (v/v) acetic acid and 0.3% (v/v) furfural at 40°C. When ethanol fermentation was conducted at temperatures ranging from 30 to 42°C, recombinant strain R32 always gave high ethanol production. After 42 h of fermentation at 42°C, 187.6 ± 1.4 g/l glucose was utilized by recombinant strain R32 to produce 81.4 ± 2.7 g/l ethanol, which were respectively 3.4 and 4.1 times those of CE25. After 36 h of fermentation at 40°C with 0.5% (v/v) acetic acid, 194.4 ± 1.2 g/l glucose in the medium was utilized by recombinant strain R32 to produce 84.2 ± 4.6 g/l of ethanol. The extent of glucose utilization and ethanol concentration of recombinant strain R32 were 6.3 and 7.9 times those of strain CE25. The ethanol concentration produced by recombinant strain R32 was 8.9 times that of strain CE25 after fermentation for 48 h under 0.2% (v/v) furfural stress at 40°C. The strong physiological robustness and fitness of yeast strain R32 support its potential application for industrial production of bioethanol from renewable resources such as lignocelluloses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21698486     DOI: 10.1007/s10295-011-1001-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1367-5435            Impact factor:   3.346


  25 in total

1.  Genome shuffling leads to rapid phenotypic improvement in bacteria.

Authors:  Ying-Xin Zhang; Kim Perry; Victor A Vinci; Keith Powell; Willem P C Stemmer; Stephen B del Cardayré
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Regulation of thermotolerance by stress-induced transcription factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Noritaka Yamamoto; Yuka Maeda; Aya Ikeda; Hiroshi Sakurai
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2008-03-21

3.  Transport of acetate in mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae defective in monocarboxylate permeases.

Authors:  S Paiva; S Althoff; M Casal; C Leão
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1999-01-15       Impact factor: 2.742

4.  Kinetics and thermodynamics of ethanol production by a thermotolerant mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a microprocessor-controlled bioreactor.

Authors:  M I Rajoka; M Ferhan; A M Khalid
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.858

5.  Optimum conditions for yeast protoplast release and regeneration in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida tropicalis using gut enzymes of the giant African snail Achatina achatina.

Authors:  O U Ezeronye; P O Okerentugba
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.858

6.  Genome-wide analysis reveals new roles for the activation domains of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae heat shock transcription factor (Hsf1) during the transient heat shock response.

Authors:  Dawn L Eastmond; Hillary C M Nelson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Isolation and characterization of acetic acid-tolerant galactose-fermenting strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae from a spent sulfite liquor fermentation plant.

Authors:  T Lindén; J Peetre; B Hahn-Hägerdal
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  The effect of trehalose on the fermentation performance of aged cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Eduardo T V Trevisol; Anita D Panek; Sergio Cantu Mannarino; Elis C A Eleutherio
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Effect of UV radiation on thermotolerance, ethanol tolerance and osmotolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae VS1 and VS3 strains.

Authors:  M Sridhar; N Kiran Sree; L Venkateswar Rao
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.642

10.  Tolerance and adaptation of ethanologenic yeasts to lignocellulosic inhibitory compounds.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Keating; Chris Panganiban; Shawn D Mansfield
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  15 in total

1.  Streptomycin resistance-aided genome shuffling to improve doramectin productivity of Streptomyces avermitilis NEAU1069.

Authors:  Ji Zhang; Xiangjing Wang; Jinna Diao; Hairong He; Yuejing Zhang; Wensheng Xiang
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Inactivation of the transcription factor mig1 (YGL035C) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae improves tolerance towards monocarboxylic weak acids: acetic, formic and levulinic acid.

Authors:  Victor E Balderas-Hernández; Kevin Correia; Radhakrishnan Mahadevan
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  Enhanced succinic acid production by Actinobacillus succinogenes after genome shuffling.

Authors:  Pu Zheng; Kunkun Zhang; Qiang Yan; Yan Xu; Zhihao Sun
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 4.  Stress modulation as a means to improve yeasts for lignocellulose bioconversion.

Authors:  B A Brandt; T Jansen; H Volschenk; J F Görgens; W H Van Zyl; R Den Haan
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  Improving industrial yeast strains: exploiting natural and artificial diversity.

Authors:  Jan Steensels; Tim Snoek; Esther Meersman; Martina Picca Nicolino; Karin Voordeckers; Kevin J Verstrepen
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 16.408

6.  Mating of natural Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for improved glucose fermentation and lignocellulosic inhibitor tolerance.

Authors:  Trudy Jansen; Justin Wallace Hoff; Neil Jolly; Willem Heber van Zyl
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 2.099

7.  Lipidomic profiling of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Zygosaccharomyces bailii reveals critical changes in lipid composition in response to acetic acid stress.

Authors:  Lina Lindberg; Aline Xs Santos; Howard Riezman; Lisbeth Olsson; Maurizio Bettiga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Large-scale robot-assisted genome shuffling yields industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeasts with increased ethanol tolerance.

Authors:  Tim Snoek; Martina Picca Nicolino; Stefanie Van den Bremt; Stijn Mertens; Veerle Saels; Alex Verplaetse; Jan Steensels; Kevin J Verstrepen
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 6.040

9.  Development of a phenotypic assay for characterisation of ethanologenic yeast strain sensitivity to inhibitors released from lignocellulosic feedstocks.

Authors:  D Greetham; T Wimalasena; D W M Kerruish; S Brindley; R N Ibbett; R L Linforth; G Tucker; T G Phister; K A Smart
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.346

10.  Adaptive evolution of an industrial strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for combined tolerance to inhibitors and temperature.

Authors:  Valeria Wallace-Salinas; Marie F Gorwa-Grauslund
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 6.040

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.