Literature DB >> 24664516

Development of a phenotypic assay for characterisation of ethanologenic yeast strain sensitivity to inhibitors released from lignocellulosic feedstocks.

D Greetham1, T Wimalasena, D W M Kerruish, S Brindley, R N Ibbett, R L Linforth, G Tucker, T G Phister, K A Smart.   

Abstract

Inhibitors released by the breakdown of plant cell walls prevent efficient conversion of sugar into ethanol. The aim of this study was to develop a fast and reliable inhibitor sensitivity assay for ethanologenic yeast strains. The assay comprised bespoke 96-well plates containing inhibitors in isolation or combination in a format that was compatible with the Phenotypic Microarray Omnilog reader (Biolog, hayward, CA, USA). A redox reporter within the assay permits analysis of inhibitor sensitivity in aerobic and/or anaerobic conditions. Results from the assay were verified using growth on spot plates and tolerance assays in which maintenance of viability was assessed. The assay allows for individual and synergistic effects of inhibitors to be determined. It was observed that the presence of both acetic and formic acid significantly inhibited the yeast strains assessed, although this impact could be partially mitigated by buffering to neutral pH. Scheffersomyces stipitis, Candida spp., and Pichia guilliermondii demonstrated increased sensitivity to short chain weak acids at concentrations typically present in lignocellulosic hydrolysates. S. cerevisiae exhibited robustness to short chain weak acids at these concentrations. However, S. stipitis, Candida spp., and P. guilliermondii displayed increased tolerance to HMF when compared to that observed for S. cerevisiae. The results demonstrate that the phenotypic microarray assay developed in the current study is a valuable tool that can be used to identify yeast strains with desirable resistance to inhibitory compounds found in lignocellulosic hydrolysates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24664516     DOI: 10.1007/s10295-014-1431-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1367-5435            Impact factor:   3.346


  58 in total

1.  Preparation and evaluation of lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysates for growth by ethanologenic yeasts.

Authors:  Ying Zha; Ronald Slomp; Johan van Groenestijn; Peter J Punt
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

2.  Overexpression of the transcription activator Msn2 enhances the fermentation ability of industrial baker's yeast in frozen dough.

Authors:  Yu Sasano; Yutaka Haitani; Keisuke Hashida; Iwao Ohtsu; Jun Shima; Hiroshi Takagi
Journal:  Biosci Biotechnol Biochem       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.043

3.  Effect of alcohol compounds found in hemicellulose hydrolysate on the growth and fermentation of ethanologenic Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J Zaldivar; A Martinez; L O Ingram
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2000-06-05       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Expression of aldehyde dehydrogenase 6 reduces inhibitory effect of furan derivatives on cell growth and ethanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Seong-Eon Park; Hyun Min Koo; Young Kyoung Park; Sung Min Park; Jae Chan Park; Oh-Kyu Lee; Yong-Cheol Park; Jin-Ho Seo
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 5.  Adaptive response and tolerance to weak acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a genome-wide view.

Authors:  Nuno P Mira; Miguel Cacho Teixeira; Isabel Sá-Correia
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2010-10

6.  Application of DNA bar codes for screening of industrially important fungi: the haplotype of Trichoderma harzianum sensu stricto indicates superior chitinase formation.

Authors:  Viviana Nagy; Verena Seidl; George Szakacs; Monika Komoń-Zelazowska; Christian P Kubicek; Irina S Druzhinina
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Global phenotypic characterization of bacteria.

Authors:  Barry R Bochner
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 16.408

8.  Effect of fermentation inhibitors in the presence and absence of activated charcoal on the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Sung-Koo Kim; Don-Hee Park; Se Hee Song; Young-Jung Wee; Gwi-Taek Jeong
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 9.  Simplified techniques for identifying foodborne yeasts.

Authors:  T Deák
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  1993-06-25       Impact factor: 5.277

10.  Identification of candidate genes for yeast engineering to improve bioethanol production in very high gravity and lignocellulosic biomass industrial fermentations.

Authors:  Francisco B Pereira; Pedro Mr Guimarães; Daniel G Gomes; Nuno P Mira; Miguel C Teixeira; Isabel Sá-Correia; Lucília Domingues
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 6.040

View more
  11 in total

1.  Acetylcholine Protects against Candida albicans Infection by Inhibiting Biofilm Formation and Promoting Hemocyte Function in a Galleria mellonella Infection Model.

Authors:  Ranjith Rajendran; Elisa Borghi; Monica Falleni; Federica Perdoni; Delfina Tosi; David F Lappin; Lindsay O'Donnell; Darren Greetham; Gordon Ramage; Christopher Nile
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2015-06-19

2.  Assessing the potential of wild yeasts for bioethanol production.

Authors:  Stefan Ruyters; Vaskar Mukherjee; Kevin J Verstrepen; Johan M Thevelein; Kris A Willems; Bart Lievens
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  Expression of RCK2 MAPKAP (MAPK-activated protein kinase) rescues yeast cells sensitivity to osmotic stress.

Authors:  V Kumar; A J Hart; T T Wimalasena; G A Tucker; D Greetham
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 5.328

4.  Detoxification of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural by the Pleurotus ostreatus lignolytic enzymes aryl alcohol oxidase and dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Daria Feldman; David J Kowbel; N Louise Glass; Oded Yarden; Yitzhak Hadar
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 6.040

5.  Expression of Mitochondrial Cytochrome C Oxidase Chaperone Gene (COX20) Improves Tolerance to Weak Acid and Oxidative Stress during Yeast Fermentation.

Authors:  Vinod Kumar; Andrew J Hart; Ethiraju R Keerthiraju; Paul R Waldron; Gregory A Tucker; Darren Greetham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Selection of yeast strains for bioethanol production from UK seaweeds.

Authors:  Emily T Kostas; Daniel A White; Chenyu Du; David J Cook
Journal:  J Appl Phycol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Global Transcriptomic Analysis of the Response of Corynebacterium glutamicum to Vanillin.

Authors:  Can Chen; Junfeng Pan; Xiaobing Yang; Chenghao Guo; Wei Ding; Meiru Si; Yi Zhang; Xihui Shen; Yao Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Genome-wide search for candidate genes for yeast robustness improvement against formic acid reveals novel susceptibility (Trk1 and positive regulators) and resistance (Haa1-regulon) determinants.

Authors:  Sílvia F Henriques; Nuno P Mira; Isabel Sá-Correia
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.040

9.  Screening of Non- Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains for Tolerance to Formic Acid in Bioethanol Fermentation.

Authors:  Cyprian E Oshoma; Darren Greetham; Edward J Louis; Katherine A Smart; Trevor G Phister; Chris Powell; Chenyu Du
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The establishment of a marine focused biorefinery for bioethanol production using seawater and a novel marine yeast strain.

Authors:  Abdelrahman Saleh Zaky; Darren Greetham; Gregory A Tucker; Chenyu Du
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.