Literature DB >> 16470880

Tolerance and adaptation of ethanologenic yeasts to lignocellulosic inhibitory compounds.

Jeffrey D Keating1, Chris Panganiban, Shawn D Mansfield.   

Abstract

Synthetic mixtures of predominant lignocellulosic hexose sugars were supplemented with separate aliquots of three inhibitory compounds (furfural, hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF), and acetic acid) in a series of concentrations and fermented by the spent sulfite liquor (SSL)-adapted yeast strain Tembec T1 and the natural isolate Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae) Y-1528 to compare tolerance and assess fermentative efficacy. The performance of Y-1528 exceeded that of Tembec T1 by a significant margin, with faster hexose sugar consumption, higher ethanol productivity, and in the case of furfural and HMF, faster inhibitor consumption. Nevertheless, furfural had a dose-proportionate effect on sugar consumption rate and ethanol productivity in both strains, but did not substantially affect ethanol yield. HMF had a similar effect on sugar consumption rate and ethanol productivity, and also lowered ethanol yield. Surprisingly, acetic acid had the least impact on sugar consumption rate and ethanol productivity, and stimulated ethanol yield at moderate concentrations. Sequential iterations of softwood (SW) and hardwood (HW) SSL were subsequently inoculated with the two yeast strains in order to compare adaptation to, and performance in lignocellulosic substrates in a cell recycle batch fermentation (CRBF) regime. Both strains were severely affected by the HW SSL, which was attributed to specific syringyl lignin-derived degradation products and synergistic interactions between inhibitors. Though ethanologenic capacity was preserved, a net loss of performance was evident from both strains, indicating the absence of adaptation to the substrates, regardless of the sequence in which the SSL types were employed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16470880     DOI: 10.1002/bit.20838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  33 in total

1.  Repeated cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae SC90 to tolerate inhibitors generated during cassava processing waste hydrolysis for bioethanol production.

Authors:  Pakathamon Palakawong Na Ayutthaya; Theppanya Charoenrat; Warawut Krusong; Soisuda Pornpukdeewattana
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 2.  Engineering for biofuels: exploiting innate microbial capacity or importing biosynthetic potential?

Authors:  Hal Alper; Gregory Stephanopoulos
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Adaptation of the xylose fermenting yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae F12 for improving ethanol production in different fed-batch SSF processes.

Authors:  E Tomás-Pejó; M Ballesteros; J M Oliva; L Olsson
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome shuffling through recursive population mating leads to improved tolerance to spent sulfite liquor.

Authors:  Dominic Pinel; Frédéric D'Aoust; Stephen B del Cardayre; Paramjit K Bajwa; Hung Lee; Vincent J J Martin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Roles of the Yap1 transcription factor and antioxidants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae's tolerance to furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, which function as thiol-reactive electrophiles generating oxidative stress.

Authors:  Daehee Kim; Ji-Sook Hahn
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Novel endophytic yeast Rhodotorula mucilaginosa strain PTD3 II: production of xylitol and ethanol in the presence of inhibitors.

Authors:  Azra Vajzovic; Renata Bura; Kevin Kohlmeier; Sharon L Doty
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.346

7.  Improvement of robustness and ethanol production of ethanologenic Saccharomyces cerevisiae under co-stress of heat and inhibitors.

Authors:  Ying Lu; Yan-Fei Cheng; Xiu-Ping He; Xue-Na Guo; Bo-Run Zhang
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 3.346

8.  Adaptation of Escherichia coli to elevated sodium concentrations increases cation tolerance and enables greater lactic acid production.

Authors:  Xianghao Wu; Ronni Altman; Mark A Eiteman; Elliot Altman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Harnessing genetic diversity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for fermentation of xylose in hydrolysates of alkaline hydrogen peroxide-pretreated biomass.

Authors:  Trey K Sato; Tongjun Liu; Lucas S Parreiras; Daniel L Williams; Dana J Wohlbach; Benjamin D Bice; Irene M Ong; Rebecca J Breuer; Li Qin; Donald Busalacchi; Shweta Deshpande; Chris Daum; Audrey P Gasch; David B Hodge
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 10.  Stress modulation as a means to improve yeasts for lignocellulose bioconversion.

Authors:  B A Brandt; T Jansen; H Volschenk; J F Görgens; W H Van Zyl; R Den Haan
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.