Literature DB >> 34097119

Stress modulation as a means to improve yeasts for lignocellulose bioconversion.

B A Brandt1, T Jansen1, H Volschenk1, J F Görgens2, W H Van Zyl1, R Den Haan3.   

Abstract

The second-generation (2G) fermentation environment for lignocellulose conversion presents unique challenges to the fermentative organism that do not necessarily exist in other industrial fermentations. While extreme osmotic, heat, and nutrient starvation stresses are observed in sugar- and starch-based fermentation environments, additional pre-treatment-derived inhibitor stress, potentially exacerbated by stresses such as pH and product tolerance, exist in the 2G environment. Furthermore, in a consolidated bioprocessing (CBP) context, the organism is also challenged to secrete enzymes that may themselves lead to unfolded protein response and other stresses. This review will discuss responses of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to 2G-specific stresses and stress modulation strategies that can be followed to improve yeasts for this application. We also explore published -omics data and discuss relevant rational engineering, reverse engineering, and adaptation strategies, with the view of identifying genes or alleles that will make positive contributions to the overall robustness of 2G industrial strains. KEYPOINTS: • Stress tolerance is a key driver to successful application of yeast strains in biorefineries. • A wealth of data regarding stress responses has been gained through omics studies. • Integration of this knowledge could inform engineering of fit for purpose strains.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consolidated bioprocessing; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Second-generation biofuel; Stress modulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34097119     DOI: 10.1007/s00253-021-11383-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   4.813


  119 in total

Review 1.  Molecular mechanisms of the yeast adaptive response and tolerance to stresses encountered during ethanol fermentation.

Authors:  Choowong Auesukaree
Journal:  J Biosci Bioeng       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Evolutionary engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for enhanced tolerance to hydrolysates of lignocellulosic biomass.

Authors:  María P Almario; Luis H Reyes; Katy C Kao
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Relationship between ethanol tolerance, H+ -ATPase activity and the lipid composition of the plasma membrane in different wine yeast strains.

Authors:  F Aguilera; R A Peinado; C Millán; J M Ortega; J C Mauricio
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 5.277

Review 4.  Metabolic effects of furaldehydes and impacts on biotechnological processes.

Authors:  João R M Almeida; Magnus Bertilsson; Marie F Gorwa-Grauslund; Steven Gorsich; Gunnar Lidén
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Furfural induces reactive oxygen species accumulation and cellular damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Sandra A Allen; William Clark; J Michael McCaffery; Zhen Cai; Alison Lanctot; Patricia J Slininger; Z Lewis Liu; Steven W Gorsich
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 6.040

6.  Effects of acetic acid on the kinetics of xylose fermentation by an engineered, xylose-isomerase-based Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain.

Authors:  Eleonora Bellissimi; Johannes P van Dijken; Jack T Pronk; Antonius J A van Maris
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Integrative analyses reveal transcriptome-proteome correlation in biological pathways and secondary metabolism clusters in A. flavus in response to temperature.

Authors:  Youhuang Bai; Sen Wang; Hong Zhong; Qi Yang; Feng Zhang; Zhenhong Zhuang; Jun Yuan; Xinyi Nie; Shihua Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  ALD5, PAD1, ATF1 and ATF2 facilitate the catabolism of coniferyl aldehyde, ferulic acid and p-coumaric acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Peter Temitope Adeboye; Maurizio Bettiga; Lisbeth Olsson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The influence of HMF and furfural on redox-balance and energy-state of xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Magnus Ask; Maurizio Bettiga; Valeria Mapelli; Lisbeth Olsson
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 6.040

10.  The chemical nature of phenolic compounds determines their toxicity and induces distinct physiological responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in lignocellulose hydrolysates.

Authors:  Peter Temitope Adeboye; Maurizio Bettiga; Lisbeth Olsson
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.298

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of the Unfolded Protein Response in Cellobiose Utilization of Recombinant Angel- and W303-1A-Derived Yeast Expressing β-Glucosidase.

Authors:  Shaolan Zou; Yudie Jia; Qing He; Kun Zhang; Rui Ban; Jiefang Hong; Minhua Zhang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-31

Review 2.  Exploring Yeast Diversity to Produce Lipid-Based Biofuels from Agro-Forestry and Industrial Organic Residues.

Authors:  Marta N Mota; Paula Múgica; Isabel Sá-Correia
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.