| Literature DB >> 21698208 |
Solomon H Mariam1, Jim Werngren, Joakim Aronsson, Sven Hoffner, Dan I Andersson.
Abstract
For an infecting bacterium the human body provides several potential ecological niches with both internally (e.g. host immunity) and externally (e.g. antibiotic use) imposed growth restrictions that are expected to drive adaptive evolution in the bacterium, including the development of antibiotic resistance. To determine the extent and pattern of heterogeneity generated in a bacterial population during long-term antibiotic treatment, we examined in a monoclonal Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection antibiotic resistant mutants isolated from one patient during a 9-years period. There was a progressive accumulation of resistance mutations in the infecting clone. Furthermore, apparent clonal sweeps as well as co-existence of different resistant mutants were observed during this time, demonstrating that during treatment there is a high degree of dynamics in the bacterial population. These findings have important implications for diagnostics and treatment of drug resistant tuberculosis infections.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21698208 PMCID: PMC3116863 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021147
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Date of isolation and resistance pattern of the different isolates of M. tuberculosis as tested in the BACTEC 460 system and antibiotic resistance mutations identified in isolates obtained from eight different time points.
| IPatient isolate/date isolated(D/M/Y)/isolate No. | Drug/target gene sequenced | |||||||||
| Isoniazid/ | Rifampicin/ | Streptomycin/ | Ethambutol/ | Amikacin/ | ||||||
| S/R | Mutation | S/R | Mutation | S/R | Mutation | S/R | Mutation | S/R | Mutation | |
| 1/2-4-91/S91-222 | R | AGC315ACC | S | wt | S | wt | R | wt | S | wt |
| 2/12-7-91/S91-224 | R | AGC315ACC | R | GAC516GTC | S | wt | R | wt | S | wt |
| 3/11-9-91/S91-263 | R | AGC315ACC | R | GAC516GTC | R | AAG87AGG | R | wt | S | wt |
| 4/13-12-91/S92-001 | R | AGC315ACC | R | GAC516GTC | R | wt | R | wt | S | A513C |
| 5/5-2-92/S92-031 | R | AGC315ACC | R | GAC516GTC | R | AAG87AGG | R | wt | S | wt |
| 6/14-12-92/S93-007 | R | AGC315ACC | R | GAC516GTC | R | AAG42AGG | R | wt | S | wt |
| 7/5-2-93/S93-021 | R | AGC315ACC | R | GAC516GTC | R | wt | R | wt | S | A513C |
| 8/N-3-99/S99-293 | R | AGC315ACC | R | GAC516GTC | R | AAG42AGG | R | wt | R | A1400G |
: S = Susceptible, R = Resistant.
wt = wild-type.
: Streptomycin-resistant isolates with wild-type rpsL were checked for mutation in rrs. The A513C mutation in rrs confers streptomycin resistance whereas the A1400G mutation confers amikacin resistance.
Antibiotic resistance and prescription pattern during 1991–2000.
| Date | Apr91 | May91 | May91 | Jul91 | Jul91 | Aug91 | Nov91 | Dec91 | Dec91 | Apr92 | Oct92 | Oct92 | Aug93 | Oct93 | Nov93 | Oct93 | Nov93 | Dec93 | Mar94 | Mar94 | Jul94 | Jul94 | Sep94 | Sep94 | Oct94 | Nov94 | Feb95 | Mar95 | Jun95 | Sep95 | Dec95 | Dec95 | Apr99 | Apr99 | Jun99 | Jun99 | Jul99 | Sep99 | Sep99 | Jan00 | Jan00 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Azithromycin | R | R | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amikacin | X | X | X | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | |||||||||||||||||||
| Capreomycin | I | S | X | S | X | I | S | S | S | R | X | S | S | S | I | I | I | R | I | S | X | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Ciprofloxacin | X | X | X | R | R | X | R | X | R | S | X | S | X | S | S | S | S | S | S | X | S | S | S | S | S | S | X | S | X | X | X | S | S | S | X | ||||||
| Clarithromycin | R | R | R | R | R | R | X | S | X | R | S | X | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Clofazimin | X | R | X | X | S | S | X | S | X | S | S | S | S | S | X | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | X | X | X | S | X | S | X | ||||||||||||
| Cycloserine | R | R | R | R | S | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ethambutol | S | X | X | R | X | R | R | R | R | I | R | X | I | X | I | S | I | S | S | R | X | R | S | R | R | R | R | X | R | X | X | X | X | R | S | X | |||||
| Ethionamide | X | X | I | S | X | I | X | I | S | I | I | R | X | I | S | R | R | I | R | X | R | X | I | R | |||||||||||||||||
| Isoniazid | X | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | X | R | R | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Levofloxacin | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PABA | R | R | R | R | R | R | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Protionamide | X | S | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pyrazinamide | X | X | X | X | S | S | X | X | X | X | S | S | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rifabutin | X | R | X | I | R | R | I | I | I | I | R | X | R | I | R | R | R | R | X | R | X | R | |||||||||||||||||||
| Rifampicin | X | S | X | X | X | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Streptomycin | S | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Thioacetazone | R | R | R |
An X indicates that the patient was treated with that antibiotic. R, I and S refer to resistant, intermediate and susceptible. The patient was not treated during the period 13 Nov 1996 to 8 Apr 1999.
Heterogeneity in types of streptomycin resistance mutations isolated during treatment.
| Parent isolate | Sub-clones | Gene | ||
|
|
| |||
| Nucleotide A513 | Nucleotide A1400 | |||
| 1 (S 91-222) | 1.1–1.10 | wt | wt | wt |
| 2 (S 91-224) | 2.1–2.10 | wt | wt | wt |
| 3 (S 91-263) | 3.1,3.3–3.7,3.9–3.10 | AAG87→AGG | wt | wt |
| 3 (S 91-263) | 3.2 | wt | A513→C | wt |
| 3 (S 91-263) | 3.8 | AAG42→AGG | wt | wt |
| 4 (S 92-001) | 4.1–4.2,4.4–4.10 | AAG87→AGG | wt | wt |
| 4 (S 92-001) | 4.3 | AAG42→AGG | wt | wt |
| 5 (S 92-031) | 5.1–5.4,5.6,5.8–5.9 | AAG87→AGG | wt | wt |
| 5 (S 92-031) | 5.5 | AAG87→ANG | wt | wt |
| 5 (S 92-031) | 5.7 | ND | wt | wt |
| 5 (S 92-031) | 5.10 | wt | wt | wt |
| 6 (S 93-007) | 6.1–6.10 | AAG42→AGG | wt | wt |
| 7 (S 93-021) | 7.1,7.7 | AAG42→AGG | wt | wt |
| 7 (S 93-021) | 7.2–7.6, 7.8–7.10 | wt | A513→C | wt |
| 8 (S 99-293) | 8.1–8.7,8.9–8.10 | AAG42→AGG | wt | A1400→G |
| 8 (S 99-293) | 8.8 | wt | wt | A1400→G |
Relative fitness expressed as competition indexes (CI) and frequency of different resistant mutants isolated at the different time points.
| Time | (isolate) |
|
|
|
| 1991 | (1, parent) | 1 (0.7, 1.3) | wt | 10/10 |
| 1991 | (3.1) | 0.3 (0.3, 0.3) |
| 9/10 |
| 1991 | (3.2) | <0.01 (<0.01, <0.01) |
| 1/10 |
| 1992 | (4.4) | 0.3 (0.2, 0.4) |
| 10/10 |
| 1992 | (5) | 8 (6, 11) |
| 10/10 |
| 1993 | (6) | 0.3 (0.2, 0.4) |
| 10/10 |
| 1993 | (7.1) | 0.07 (0.04, 0.1) |
| 2/10 |
| 1993 | (7.2) | 1 (1, 1) |
| 8/10 |
| 1999 | (8) | 0.5 (0.3, 0.6) |
| 10/10 |
CIs were determined as described in Materials and Methods.
Numbers are averages based on two independent measurements (shown within parantheses).
Frequency indicates how many of the 10 sub-clones obtained from that particular time point and isolate carried the specified resistance mutation.